Originally posted by Parka:If a team is real good, it will not be pulled down even if the referee is incompetent.
Van Diver pleaded not guilty? but all the evidence is against him. how to refute them?Originally posted by the Bear:besides, the horse just pleaded "not guilty" to the stomp on cole... when he's guilty as sin... what kind of mentality is this?
as i said.. the penalty is the turn key and arsenal went all out to fight back... if no penalty given, arsenal defenders would have stay behind and watched him..Originally posted by 101wish:aiya, for any match ,referee is the 1st one to be blamed...anyway, if there's no penalty kick, rooney oso scored a goal..
Papers: Man U boss pelted with foodSource: The Star Online, 27/10/04 (courtesy of IK)
BY CHOI TUCK WO
Newspaper in Briain are agog with stories of the Man Utd manager being pelted with food while Wenger lets rip after Man Utd won the historic showdown on Sunday.
LONDON: So, was it pizza, sandwich, French onion soup or even a piece of flying beef?
The hunt is on for the mystery Old Trafford chucker even as an extensive cover-up by Arsenal and Manchester United is underway to avoid a full-scale probe by the police and the Football Association (FA).
According to The Times, the controversy took another twist when the post-match rumpus that saw Sir Alex Ferguson pelted with soup and pizza by an Arsenal player took place in full view of Greater Manchester Police officers.
The paper quoted sources as confirming that police stationed inside the tunnel to guard against a flare-up witnessed the attack on the United manager, which came seconds after he was involved in a slanging match with his Arsenal counterpart, Arsene Wenger.
Ferguson was asked whether he intended to press charges but declined, said the paper.
The FA, according to the paper, had announced that it was “looking into reports of an alleged incident in the tunnel after the match.
“But with no camera footage available and no individual from either club willing to go on record about what happened, it has no hard evidence on which to base its investigation.
“The FA would be prepared to listen to evidence from independent witnesses, such as the police, but no such evidence had been offered or sought,” it added.
The paper said the post-match episode marked a nadir in the hostile relations between United and Arsenal in recent seasons.
But the clubs do at least appear to have agreed upon a pact of silence about what took place.
UnitedÂ’s players, it added, were sworn to secrecy, although Old Trafford officials were angered by a couple of minor leaks from the Highbury end.
According to The Sun, Ferguson was pelted with pizza, soup and sandwiches while Gunners boss Wenger yelled abuse at Fergie, branded United striker Ruud van Nistelrooy a cheat and ripped into Wayne Rooney.
In its front-page headline, “War and Pizza”, the paper reported that all hell broke loose as tempers exploded in the tunnel after the match.
“Van Nistelrooy, who scored a disputed penalty, lit the fuse by tapping Wenger on the arm and making a comment.
“Wenger then turned on Fergie and started screaming and finger-prodding him,” a United insider told the paper.
“He also gave Rooney a character assassination, yelling all the time. Fergie looked shocked as no one had ever seen Wenger lose it like this.
“That’s when food was hurled from the Arsenal dressing room. Fergie’s shirt and blazer were covered in soup and pizza – and all the time Wenger was still ranting at him,” it said.
Eventually, the United security staff bundled off the Arsenal group while the United players waited in their dressing room until their rivals had left.
In its special report, the Evening Standard launched a hunt for the mystery chucker although initial reports indicated it was not soup but a sandwich thrown by accident.
The paper provided five suspects:
·SOL CAMPBELL – suspicion immediately falls on him because he shares a surname with the soup manufacturer. And his blood would have been brought to a boil following the penalty awarded for his mistimed tackle on Rooney.
·JENS LEHMANN – He might have mistaken Fergie for Oliver Kahn, his sworn enemy and rival for the national goalkeeper’s jersey. Would have been antagonised by the penalty awarded to Rooney – which van Nistelrooy slotted effortlessly past him.
·THIERRY HENRY – Frustrated by a rare lacklustre performance and whispers that he fails to rise on big occasions. But Henry is the king of cool and lobbing pea (or tomato) soup at Fergie is not his style. Would obviously have preferred French onion.
·PATRICK VIEIRA – Sizzling with indignation following the end of his club’s unbeaten run, the French midfielder might have felt it necessary to let Fergie and United know what type of reception to expect when they come to London in February.
·GABRIEL HEINZE – With a surname like that, he cannot be ignored. As a newcomer to Old Trafford, the Argentine might have thought it was traditional to mark a famous victory by anointing his manager.
macam watching me on soccer field?Originally posted by BeNo:1. Tackles from G. Neville toward Reyes.. man, Nevilla should be awarded more than 1 yellow cards for his tackles.. plus other players' tackles.. i almost thght I watching WWW on soccer field..
I was looking at the statistics for the match and realised that the shots on goals were almost similar. Apparently, Arsenal failed to convert those chances.Originally posted by the Bear:you will be surprised...
a good team will get mired in bad refereeing decisions...
granted, both sides were pretty terrible that night, the ref made the difference...
besides, the horse just pleaded "not guilty" to the stomp on cole... when he's guilty as sin... what kind of mentality is this?
i figure, if the players cheat, the ref can only do so much even when he's not biased (more than i can say for riley)
oh.. btw, this bit escaped everyone.. riley actually celebrated with the MUFC players a couple of seasons ago after a win
after THAT, can we actually say he's not biased towards MUFC?