Oct 31, 2007
Exorcism case: Trial adjourned as Mdm Valli weeps uncontrollably on stand
By Jermyn Chow
THE woman suing the Redemptorist Order of Novena Church and its priests and choir members - 51-year-old Madam Amutha Valli - immediately buried her face in her hands and wept uncontrollably, even before she could finish taking the oath in court on Wednesday afternoon.
It was her first appearance in the Supreme Court since the trial began a week ago - but it only lasted for less than an hour.
As her lawyer, Mr R.J Bajwa read out her 13-page affidavit to her, she took great difficulty to reply between her sobbing, wiping her tears with her handkerchief.
In between tears, Madam Valli said: 'Don't touch me...don't touch me', before requesting to take her medication.
Her daughter, 22-year-old Subashini Jeyabal, was seen in court shaking her head as her mother broke down.
Her inability to compose herself on the stand finally led Justice Lee to adjourn the trial to Thursday.
Dressed in a blue wind breaker and using a walking stick, the former national walker, who arrived accompanied by her maid, looked much heavier than in the pictures published in papers over the last week.
Madam Valli is suing for what she alleges was a botched exorcism that left her with post-traumatic stress disorder, seeking compensation from the Redemptorist Order that runs the Church, two priests, and six church-goers involved in the ritual.
Earlier in the morning, the courtroom was already packed with many curious members of the public hoping to catch a glimpse of Madam Valli.
With the seats in the public gallery all snapped up, court officials were even seen turning people away and advising them to try their luck again after lunch.
Daughter grilled during cross-examination
Earlier, Madam Valli's 22-year-old daughter, Ms Subashini Jeyabal, was grilled on the stand during her testimony.
During her cross-examination, Mr Denis Tan, lawyer for one of the defendants, quizzed her on the exact locations of a statue where she claimed her mother was praying before she fainted, and the room where the supposed exorcism took place.
Doubts were also raised when Mr Tan said: 'It takes a very strong and violent person to make such loud clanging sounds', referring to Ms Jeyabal's claim that her mother 'rattled' the church gates as she fainted on the night of August 10, 2004.
She was then taken to a room where she was forcefully confined and subjected to exorcism rites by two priests, Father Simon Tan and Father Jacob Ong.
Mr Tan's line of questioning had suggested that Ms Jeyabal was not telling the truth, and had raised fierce objections from Madam Valli's lawyer, Mr RJ Bajwa.
To this, Mr Tan said:' I am just testing her credibility.'
Mr Bajwa said Mr Tan was 'badgering the witness', but Justice Lee Seiu Kin maintained that he would allow the 'rigorous cross-examination' by both counsel as 'this trial is about finding the truth'.
The afternoon session continued with Mr Tan continuing his attack on Ms Jeyabal's s credibility, as he introduced a host of evidence ranging from floor plans and videos to photos that contradicted her claims.
But when Mr Tan explained that the position of the statue she had earlier pointed out was wrong, she argued that 'it was a scam on their (the priests) part' to make her out as a liar.
Courtroom commotion
Mr Bajwa also took issue with the public gallery, where there was plenty of laughter and noise coming from those present. Mr Bajwa said they were 'heckling the witness'.
This was taken very seriously by Justice Lee, who then warned members of the public not to make any noise, as this would intimidate the witness.
He added: 'If necessary, I will clear the gallery.'
The trial resumes on Thursday morning.
http://www.straitstimes.com/