the Act Pro Buay Pro list
-
so? that post doesnt show anything abt their lack of knowledgeOriginally posted by Suicine:Please re-read my fifth post on this thread.
all i see is just you flaming his personality and behaviour, and in no way have you shown in that post that qualify as a credible explaination that they are fooling people
sheesh -
You didnt even try once, so why even talk about hounding?Originally posted by Suicine:I can't possibly be hounding after every one of his posts. After realising that he is one who likes to talk nonsense, we should wisen up and stop listening to him.
Like i said, if you see something wrong, why didnt you point out immediately instead of just sititng here and labelling people? -
let's face it, bohiruci's mind is too weak to be taken seriously. Like the time he said "wads NUSBS?" but later changed it to "what u say NUSBS for". This tells us something.Originally posted by laurence82:so? that post doesnt show anything abt their lack of knowledge
all i see is just you flaming his personality and behaviour, and in no way have you shown in that post that qualify as a credible explaination that they are fooling people
sheesh
Perhaps I should change my first post a bit. -
There, I changed it to "noobs acting pro". happy now? in fields other than buddhism, "being knowledgeable" is often used interchangeably with "being pro".
-
this, by the way, is of you doing exactly what you said he doOriginally posted by Suicine:let's face it, bohiruci's mind is too weak to be taken seriously. Like the time he said "wads NUSBS?" but later changed it to "what u say NUSBS for". This tells us something.
Perhaps I should change my first post a bit.
doing something wrong or something nasty and fudging around -
You are being picky here. Why should I try? I am not his nanny. And why am I replying to you? You're such a nitpicking nuisance. I don't have to reply to you.Originally posted by laurence82:You didnt even try once, so why even talk about hounding?
Like i said, if you see something wrong, why didnt you point out immediately instead of just sititng here and labelling people? -
You still dont get itOriginally posted by Suicine:There, I changed it to "noobs acting pro". happy now? in fields other than buddhism, "being knowledgeable" is often used interchangeably with "being pro".
Stop continuing making mistakes and shifting around trying to fool the readers
-
What is "fudging"?Originally posted by laurence82:this, by the way, is of you doing exactly what you said he do
doing something wrong or something nasty and fudging around -
Unless you provide the proof that I demand just like how I provided yours, please stop talking in my topic.Originally posted by laurence82:You still dont get it
Stop continuing making mistakes and shifting around trying to fool the readers -
Because you cant prove exactly why and how they are wrong in the posts and topics they posted inOriginally posted by Suicine:You are being picky here. Why should I try? I am not his nanny. And why am I replying to you? You're such a nitpicking nuisance. I don't have to reply to you.
And when confronted, pointed me to a post which merely stated why you cant stand their behaviour.
Why? Cant face the heat and turn around and call me nitpicking nuisance?
-
Looks like you are lost. Look at my 10th post. Do you not see my reasons given to you for shade343? And in that post you were talking about "trying to stalk every one of shade's posts and correct them". I do not assume myself to have such capability. Wise people see patterns and learn from them.Originally posted by laurence82:Because you cant prove exactly why and how they are wrong in the posts and topics they posted in
And when confronted, pointed me to a post which merely stated why you cant stand their behaviour.
Why? Cant face the heat and turn around and call me nitpicking nuisance? -
Yes, already in my 9th post i explained in detail how you shift around, when confronted with questions on how they are wrong, you pointed me to a post which merely shows how you flaming them by calling them hypocrites and low EQ and stuffOriginally posted by Suicine:Unless you provide the proof that I demand just like how I provided yours, please stop talking in my topic.
You are the one who started this thread. Have the guts to prove what you want to say rather than turning around to demand the same for people who ask you questions you couldnt anser.
This is a clever trick, but it doesnt work on me. -
Sheesh, is this an explaination of how unknowledgeable they are?Originally posted by Suicine:like the time he was whining how AEN missed his date with him. he even used all sorts of degradory terms for 15 yr olds. as if he is very matured. he even had to complain to me on msn that he is doing work fit for an ITE grad rather than the DIPLOMA holder that he is. wad a petty guy. still on irc wanna talk about what "selflessness" and on forums talk about all these things. not hypocrite call what?
Somebody think the forumers are three years old kids.
You are merely flaming them based on their personality and behaviour, not on how they lack knowledge in Buddhism.
You kept insisting they are acting pro and such, but up to the bloody second page of this topic, you have never shown how.
Work harder to fool us. -
Look at the topic. Then look at the first post in the topic. It clearly says "Act pro buay pro". What do you have to complain about that?Originally posted by laurence82:Yes, already in my 9th post i explained in detail how you shift around, when confronted with questions on how they are wrong, you pointed me to a post which merely shows how you flaming them by calling them hypocrites and low EQ and stuff
You are the one who started this thread. Have the guts to prove what you want to say rather than turning around to demand the same for people who ask you questions you couldnt anser.
This is a clever trick, but it doesnt work on me. -
What stalking them?Originally posted by Suicine:Looks like you are lost. Look at my 10th post. Do you not see my reasons given to you for shade343? And in that post you were talking about "trying to stalk every one of shade's posts and correct them". I do not assume myself to have such capability. Wise people see patterns and learn from them.
Dont give excuses and all that stalking sh|t.
You DID NOT even post once to challenge them.
Sheesh
Maybe because you dont even know what is wrong, you just want to flame them thats all. -
Look at my thread. There is no sign of "knowledgeable or not" here.Originally posted by laurence82:Sheesh, is this an explaination of how unknowledgeable they are?
Somebody think the forumers are three years old kids.
You are merely flaming them based on their personality and behaviour, not on how they lack knowledge in Buddhism.
You kept insisting they are acting pro and such, but up to the bloody second page of this topic, you have never shown how.
Work harder to fool us. -
Originally posted by Suicine:Look at my thread. There is no sign of "knowledgeable or not" here.
Read your first post. Who you trying to fool here?Originally posted by Suicine:People spotted to be noobs acting pro:
shade343
bohiruci -
Looks like either you have comprehensions problems, or you are trying to be picky.Originally posted by laurence82:What stalking them?
Dont give excuses and all that stalking sh|t.
You DID NOT even post once to challenge them.
Sheesh
Maybe because you dont even know what is wrong, you just want to flame them thats all.
*sighs*
ok, you were telling me to post in his threads themselves to correct his wrong knowledge right? -
Again, for someone short term memory and visual handicap, who is trying to call people ignoramus and later deny it.Originally posted by Suicine:shade spouts total nonsense. it doesn't take a buddhist master to realise that what he says isn't buddhism. he is just here to tell us what he fantasizes. bohiruci on the other hand, though I dont remember him being wrong but his EQ damn low and yet still act like a big master. what a hypocrite. plus he talks like an idiot. learn from this kind of people sure become idiot.
-
"Pro" does not equate to being knowledgeable.Originally posted by laurence82:Read your first post. Who you trying to fool here? -
You have the brain of a slow tortoise.Originally posted by Suicine:Looks like either you have comprehensions problems, or you are trying to be picky.
*sighs*
ok, you were telling me to post in his threads themselves to correct his wrong knowledge right?
You are the one having problems comprehending your own posts. -
again, who you trying to fool here?Originally posted by Suicine:"Pro" does not equate to being knowledgeable. -
Look, there are 2 separate people here. SEPARATE. bohiruci and shade. One is ignorant and the other is low EQ (and evidently IQ). Do not mix them up. Both can be classified as "noobs acting pros" though.Originally posted by laurence82:Again, for someone short term memory and visual handicap, who is trying to call people ignoramus and later deny it. -
Look at my previous post. It is the same concept as "a dog is an animal but an animal may not be a dog".Originally posted by laurence82:again, who you trying to fool here? -
So, acting pro doesnt equate to them not knowledgeable but acting like one?Originally posted by Suicine:Look at my thread. There is no sign of "knowledgeable or not" here.
Again ,seriously, who are you wanting to fool here?