Your first post says they are pro acting noobsOriginally posted by Suicine:Look, there are 2 separate people here. SEPARATE. bohiruci and shade. One is ignorant and the other is low EQ (and evidently IQ). Do not mix them up. Both can be classified as "noobs acting pros" though.
Rephrase this.Originally posted by laurence82:So, acting pro doesnt equate to them not knowledgeable but acting like one?
Again ,seriously, who are you wanting to fool here?Seriously, stop that.
noobs acting pros. not pros acting noobs.Originally posted by laurence82:Your first post says they are pro acting noobs
Then you start to call them seperately as ignorant or low EQ
WHich merely back up what i said all along
You are saying they lack of knowledge, and on top of that, back up my previous posts you are flaming on their personality and behaviour.
You know? Your own behaviour is pretty disgusting too.
You are a noob acting pro by not being able to point out exactly what wrongful posts they made. I mean, certainly it takes some people of 'some knowledge' to be able to point out others wrong, either that, he is fooling ard.
Stop what? Pointing out that you are trying to fool everyone?Originally posted by Suicine:Seriously, stop that.
inOriginally posted by Suicine:Don't bother with bohiruci, he's an idiot.
Dont try to befuddle people hereOriginally posted by Suicine:noobs acting pros. not pros acting noobs.
As I have said for the multitude times, pro is not knowledge and knowledge is not pro.
Blame yourself for not being able to READ MY POINTS
Uniquely you. Just as what you have shown labelling people as having low EQ or ignorant, you cant face the heat, turn tail and run off while calling people rockheads.Originally posted by Suicine:Sorry but I do not waste my brain power talking to rockheads. Good day.
Let's take an Arhat. Does an Arhat need to know all the sect rules and practises in order to become an Arhat? No he doesn't. The Arhat is the pro, and the scholar is the knowledgeable.Originally posted by laurence82:Dont try to befuddle people here
Being a pro or professional in something means having the expertise or knowledge in that field, so acting pro means acting as if they have knowledge or expertise in something. If you are saying they are acting pro, by implication you mean they actually do not possess that knowledge.
Its YOU who dont even reading your own script for comprehension.
Your stupidity shown here is amazing.
Again, who are you trying to fool?Originally posted by Suicine:Let's take an Arhat. Does an Arhat need to know all the sect rules and practises in order to become an Arhat? No he doesn't. The Arhat is the pro, and the scholar is the knowledgeable.
Yes, cannot meh?Originally posted by laurence82:Didnt you just said you wont waste your brain power on rockheads?
Arent you eating your words now?
Look at the acrobat. Does it take the master acrobat to point out that this acrobat has FALLEN DOWN THE GODDAMN SWING??Originally posted by laurence82:Again, who are you trying to fool?
Since you said they are acting pro, that means you must be pro or you have the knowledge some to have the qualification to point out why they are wrong or lacking in some areas.
Otherwise, you are just like them right? One big liar.
I could never do it as convincingly as AEN and others can. Why should I poke my nose into something and mess things up?Originally posted by laurence82:Again, have the gumptions to post one liner crap but dont even bother to explain why, then gave excuses he couldnt be bothered to stalk people.
If you cant do it, just say so. I think most are pretty forgiving here.
Unlike some, I prefer quality over quantity in my posts. Simplicity is best if it achieves its aims.Originally posted by laurence82:Again, have the gumptions to post one liner crap but dont even bother to explain why, then gave excuses he couldnt be bothered to stalk people.
If you cant do it, just say so. I think most are pretty forgiving here.
Nice try with an analogy, but i had this thing with analogies, your analogy must be accurate and damning, or else it just a tool to fool everyone.Originally posted by Suicine:Look at the acrobat. Does it take the master acrobat to point out that this acrobat has FALLEN DOWN THE GODDAMN SWING??
Then what make you qualified to label others as acting pro?Originally posted by Suicine:but anyway, it doesn't matter how knowledgeable I am or pro. This is because I seldom answer people's questions on buddhism.
I have made my points clearly here. If you cant see, too bad.Originally posted by Suicine:You keep saying that I post one liner crap. What about yours? All I see are ideas that ignore what I replied you. Not to mention the golden line "Again, who are you trying to fool here?"
Do you agree with the idea of "guilty until proven innocent"?
The law of gravity pointing to here, is AEN and host of mods' posts. They always back up their statements with evidence. When the 2 parties do not match, we know clearly who is the correct one.Originally posted by laurence82:Nice try with an analogy, but i had this thing with analogies, your analogy must be accurate and damning, or else it just a tool to fool everyone.
The average joe know the acrobat has fallen off, and this whole thing got nothing to do with acrobatic skills. The average joe, like every other average joe, clearly knows the law of gravity.
This is where people use analogies to fool everyone. IF you are talking about laws of gravity alone, pulling in a character of a master acrobat is just to fool everyone to think how easy it is to look at an issue.
If you are talking about acrobatic skills, then the issue is entirely different. Its about how an average joe know some bit about a complex skill.
Clearly, if everyone know bohiruci and shady been writing nonsense and such, they would have pointed out so. If they didnt, have the guts to point out why exactly and challenge them, instead of posting one liners and give excuses you dont stalk posts.
You spoke too fast, noob.Originally posted by Suicine:Stumped, my young padawan?