A Buddhist is someone who follows the teachings of the Buddha - someone who embraces the four noble truths, attempts to live according to the precepts and most likely practices meditation and/or acts of devotion.Originally posted by casino_king:That is just your opinion. They told me themselves that they are Buddhists. There is also a thread to tell Buddhists to celebrate Kuam Im birthday tommorrow in this forum.
Although we may not agree with certain religious points of view they hold, if they are sincere in their efforts to serve humanity and uplift it, we must respect them for it. There are noble people in every religion. The Buddha did not advise his disciples to go and convert people who would otherwise go to hell. Rather he advised them to show the world what is right and what is wrong and to be good and to do good, to encourage men to come and see for themselves the truth that he taught.Originally posted by casino_king:You are just stating the obvious. That nobody is forcing me. This is a forum, we are having a discussion. If you are not interested to have a discussion, then why are you in a forum?
The thread is very clear, what happens to people who does not belive in Buddhism? To answer that question, we have to look at Buddhism in detail and define exactly what Buddhism is all about. What Buddhism hopes to achieve and what Buddhists claim.
You are not helping because you do not provide any useful information to extend the discussion.
so many pple trying to enlighten casinoOriginally posted by marcteng:I would suggest you go compare and understand all the major religions in this world and keep an open mind.
Almighty or Omniscience/Omnipotent God concept are not new.
Before the advent of Christianity and Islam, there were many religions in India that centred on an almighty god being or many gods, that he is the one who created the cosmos, world and living beings.
Thats why some people are disillusioned with god concept teachings as it does not fully explain about the world they live in, or the explanations are not convincing.
There is no baptised in buddhism.To be a buddhist,we seek refuge in the Three Jewels(triple gem)Originally posted by casino_king:You are confusing me. Yesterday somebody, I wont say who, asked me if 2 packets of Thai biscuits are the same.
I said yes. She said that she will bring the smaller packet instead of the bigger one to pray to somebody who has died a couple of years ago.
The person who died was "baptised" into Buddhism and had a Priest who was her teacher. This priest had already passed away and was the abbot of the temple in Geylang 19 or 21 or 23... I don't know if the persom going to offer the prayers and food for the dead person was "baptised."
I said: "What does it matter which one you bring since? Since you are bringing it back to eat." Immediately I regretted it because it could be rude. I mean, here I might be very rude but in real life I try to respect people's beliefs.
So what you just wrote is totally weird..
Originally posted by neutral_onliner:Well, all I can say is his ignorances abt Buddhism and I have to ask his motivations as to what his intentions are. Is he here to ask a question, to learn abt Buddhism and its practises, or here to engage in idle chat, or criticise or just to have a bone to pick.
so many pple trying to enlighten [b]casino[/b]
Originally posted by marcteng:Well, all I can say is his ignorances abt Buddhism and I have to ask his motivations as to what his intentions are. Is he here to ask a question, to learn abt Buddhism and its practises, or here to engage in idle chat, or criticise or just to have a bone to pick.
If he is here to have a bone to pick, just ignore his post. We should learn from the Buddha, when facing a false accusations, remain silent and not to react with anger or indignation. Falsehood cannot stand up to Truth eventually.
Chinese idiom, Bu Kong Zhi Puo, meaning no need to attack, they will dissipate by self.
Similarly, just ignore and learn from the Buddha. Silence is golden when provoked. Empty vessels makes the most noise. Those who have little learning, speaks loud, those with great learning, speaks little.
Actually all his doubts could be easliy cleared. All he need to do is just go to any library in sg and do some reading on buddhism.So many resources on buddhism in the libraries nowsaday.He could oso attend some talk in the buddhist fellowship or some other dharma centers.So that at least he could post some indept questions for our disscussion.Originally posted by marcteng:Well, all I can say is his ignorances abt Buddhism and I have to ask his motivations as to what his intentions are. Is he here to ask a question, to learn abt Buddhism and its practises, or here to engage in idle chat, or criticise or just to have a bone to pick.
Agreed.Originally posted by neutral_onliner:Actually all his doubts could be easliy cleared. All he need to do is just go to any library in sg and do some reading on buddhism.So many resources on buddhism in the libraries nowsaday.He could oso attend some talk in the buddhist fellowship or some other dharma centers.So that at least he could post some indept questions for our disscussion.![]()
Yes, he can do so, but I doubt it.Originally posted by neutral_onliner:Actually all his doubts could be easliy cleared. All he need to do is just go to any library in sg and do some reading on buddhism.So many resources on buddhism in the libraries nowsaday.He could oso attend some talk in the buddhist fellowship or some other dharma centers.So that at least he could post some indept questions for our disscussion.![]()
Any religions using if you dun believe, you will go to hell is a fear or scare tactics.Originally posted by askxyz:What will happen to people who don't believe in Buddhism? Will they go to hell? If not, what will happen to these people?
Ask him what is his intention first, whether to learn about Buddhism, or just want to criticise?Originally posted by Thusness:Hi Casino_King,
It is inadequate to use rational thought to understand spiritual matters. Logic is only that branch of philosophy that deals with reasoning. It does not deal with all types of thinking such as remembering (Recalling past life included), dreaming (Dream Yoga), day dreaming, neurosis, learning..etc. These other types of thinking are the job of psychology and parapsychology.
Although evidence is needed to serve as a base for inductive and deductive reasoning, full proof evidence to arrive at a certain conclusion is not necessary in logical analysis. In daily life, not all reasoning attempts to provide conclusive evidence for the truth of a given conclusion and more often than not, conclusive evidence cannot be produced. For pragmatic ground, we merely want the evidence we arrived at be 'well founded'.
As human, sleeping and dreaming took up pretty much percentage of our life. We are not just a rational being, to understand human, we have to deal with all these matters with spiritual issues included.
in Buddhism there are NO Buddhist gods or god. you have to remember this make this very clear into your head. Buddhist do not worship even to the Buddha or Bodhisattvas, they pay RESPECT by bowing down to the them teachers. (in school before and after class, we bow and greet our teachers out of respect, isn't that logical? is that worshipping praying to our teachers in school?)Originally posted by casino_king:Do you pray to Buddhist Gods, live your life like it will affect how you will be reborn - karma - and believe that if you meditate hard enough you will levitate?
When you encounter life's problems, do you refer to 2549 year old teachings or do you use common sense based on your education?
Do you expect people to pray to you and offer food regularly after you die?
Definition of Karma/\
Karma is intentional action, that is, a deed done deliberately through body, speech or mind. Karma means good and bad volition (kusala Akusala Centana). Every volitional action (except that of a Buddha or of an Arahant) is called Karma. The Buddha's and Arahants do not accumulate fresh Karma as they have destroy all their passions.
In other words, Karma is the law of moral causation. It is action and reaction in the ethical realm. It is natural law that every action produces a certain effect.
...
Karma is a law itself. But it does not follow that there should be a law-giver. The law of Karma, too, demands no law giver. It operates in its own field without the intervention of an external, independent agency.
http://www.lioncity.net/buddhism/index.php?showtopic=27134
Karma, rebirth, no soul or soulessness, Nirvana, impermanency, Four Noble Truths and the Noble Eightfold path, Dependent Origination are central to Buddhist teachings.Originally posted by sinweiy:i think we can use some modern terms to explain Buddhism to modern people. didn't Buddha do this when He tried to lead people to dharma. say if one is a child, He would use child language and if adult, He would use adult language per se.
Nirvana is the total severing of greed, hatred and folly.
http://web.singnet.com.sg/~alankhoo/Precepts.htm
how abt volition for karma ?
Chinese term for karma was also changed to ye1 li4.
/\
Most religions that centred on a god and its teachings, are abt heaven and hell, purgatory, satan or the devil, the power of god and its creation.Originally posted by marcteng:Karma, rebirth, no soul or soulessness, Nirvana, impermanency, Four Noble Truths and the Noble Eightfold path, Dependent Origination are central to Buddhist teachings.
Originally posted by neutral_onliner:Coz he has merits to get to know buddhism, and many people as his guidance
so many pple trying to enlighten [b]casino[/b]
Maybe he has heeded our advice to read more, find out more.Originally posted by justdoit77:Coz he has merits to get to know buddhism, and many people as his guidance
but yet he couldn't accept it. haiz...mo4 fa3 shi2 dai4
Acutally not easy... such people have practised and learnt under previous Buddhas.Originally posted by Isis:Maybe it's ur karma to be a non-buddhist in the present lifetime and maybe you will be a buddhist in another lifetime... when you have the affinity with buddhism...
There are people also known as pacceka-buddha whom do not come into contact with dhamma but still able to gain enlightened through their own self-cultivation and self-realisation.
Hi,Originally posted by Thusness:Hi Casino_King,
It is inadequate to use rational thought to understand spiritual matters. Logic is only that branch of philosophy that deals with reasoning. It does not deal with all types of thinking such as remembering (Recalling past life included), dreaming (Dream Yoga), day dreaming, neurosis, learning..etc. These other types of thinking are the job of psychology and parapsychology.
Although evidence is needed to serve as a base for inductive and deductive reasoning, full proof evidence to arrive at a certain conclusion is not necessary in logical analysis. In daily life, not all reasoning attempts to provide conclusive evidence for the truth of a given conclusion and more often than not, conclusive evidence cannot be produced. For pragmatic ground, we merely want the evidence we arrived at be 'well founded'.
As human, sleeping and dreaming took up pretty much percentage of our life. We are not just a rational being, to understand human, we have to deal with all these matters with spiritual issues included.
excerpt from http://buddhism.sgforums.com/?action=thread_display&thread_id=179467
Science and Buddhism
When a Buddhist looks through a telescope, they are not scared by what they might find. They are not scared of science. Science is an essential part of Buddhism. If science can disprove rebirth, then Buddhists should give up the idea of rebirth. If science disproves non-self, and shows there is a self, then all Buddhists should abandon non-self. If science proves there is no such thing as kamma, but instead there is a big God up in the sky, then all Buddhists should believe in God. That is, if it's provable science. Buddhism has no sacred cows. However, I encourage you to do those experiments for yourselves. I'll bet you will find out that there is no one 'in there'. You will find out about kamma. You will find out you've been here before, that this is not your first life. If you don't behave yourselves in this life, you'll have another life to come yet. Do you think you are finished with nappies, with school? Do you really want to go through all that again? If not be careful.
So, here is my thinking about science and Buddhism. I think that Buddhism is pure science, a science that doesn't stop 'out there', but also investigates the mind, the 'being', the 'ghost in the machine'. And it doesn't disregard any anomalies. Buddhism takes everything as its data, especially experience, and looks at it scientifically. It is incredibly successful.
One of the reasons why people celebrate science is because of all of its achievements in technology. One of the reasons why Buddhism is growing these days is because of all of its achievements in the 'technology of the mind'. It solves problems. It explains mental difficulties. Buddhism succeeds in solving those inner problems because it has all these strategies, these ancient 'gizmos', which actually work. If you try some of these Buddhist gizmos, you will find out for yourself that they produce the goods, they solve your inner suffering and pain. That is why Buddhism is growing. I think that Buddhism will supplant science!
Thank you very much.