why that rule for ladies?Originally posted by marcteng:You dun have to renounce, you can still practise abeit as a lay follower.
If you have a family,ie husband and children, it is advisable not to renounce as your obligation is to them in this lifetime.
There are quite a number of lay followers whose knowledge and practise are very good.
For ladies, its only once and if you return to lay life, you cant renounce anymore.
I think the only tradition that does not have nuns is Sri Lanka Theravada, because it sort of died off after the 'nun lineage' is not continued around a thousand years ago, but Sri Lankans are entering nunhood through Mahayana in Sri Lanka. all other Buddhist traditions have monk and nuns.Originally posted by marcteng:if one really wan to renounce. where to go renouncing for nuns?
what abt for guys who wants to renounce as a monk, mahayana and theravada?
i have thought of practising and learning dhamma as a lay follower cos in this world, we 'can fall down' easily and learn. It's much more challenging.Originally posted by marcteng:You dun have to renounce, you can still practise abeit as a lay follower.
If you have a family,ie husband and children, it is advisable not to renounce as your obligation is to them in this lifetime.
There are quite a number of lay followers whose knowledge and practise are very good.
For ladies, its only once and if you return to lay life, you cant renounce anymore.
yes indeed , but do think is there any dependent living on ur morale support ,becos the reason why Buddha set this rule of woman can only renounce once , is due to the importance of woman in a family .and Ancient Indian society potray woman as the weaker in terms of practice ,as they haveOriginally posted by Isis:i have thought of practising and learning dhamma as a lay follower cos in this world, we 'can fall down' easily and learn. It's much more challenging.
but i guess i could be happier to renounce.