well 022615 using words MUST NOT is not very suitable in buddhism.Originally posted by 022615:There was a previous topic "Is yanking accepted?"
According to my view, a monk or a bikkhu must definitely be abstained from lust, this is absolute, a monk, since one is purely a disciple of the Dharma, must totally extinguish lust, and any form of thoughts of comfort in entertaining females is absolutely prohibited, more so to talk about behaviour (flirting). This is said for true monks.
How about a layperson? My stand is: he is allowed to have minimal lust, his level of lust must be lower than ordinary human, which is to say he can copulate to procreate. What about lusty stimulation (masturbating) then?
By right a buddhist must give it up, if not, I won't say he's wrong either. Here are some guidelines about stimulation, what are the other area he must observe strictly:
1.MUST NOT flirt with opposite gender
2.MUST NOT engage in adultery
3.MUST NOT engage in permarital copultion
4.MUST NOT be addicted to stimulation
5.any upper part of the body MUST NOT touch the lower organ in contact
6.if a layperson is lusty, he MUST try to behave as morally upright as possible, and as mature, in public
thnks 4 sharing... this kind of discussion is veri positive as we r all on the path of learningOriginally posted by An Eternal Now:022615: I must say, yours are good and wise guidelines, but as neutral onliner said, it is not necessary to say 'MUST NOT'.
If one truly cultivates his mind, then when defilements find no grounding on, naturally he will not be affected by these.
Therefore cultivating the mind is important, constantly watch the arising and ceasing of the thoughts.
Buddha gave hundreds of precepts to Bhikkhus, but if he can grasp the essence of dharma, all precepts will naturally not be broken, and he is abiding by the precepts in the highest stage.
Hiding your face behind a maskOriginally posted by 022615:There was a previous topic "Is yanking accepted?"
According to my view, a monk or a bikkhu must definitely be abstained from lust, this is absolute, a monk, since one is purely a disciple of the Dharma, must totally extinguish lust, and any form of thoughts of comfort in entertaining females is absolutely prohibited, more so to talk about behaviour (flirting). This is said for true monks.
How about a layperson? My stand is: he is allowed to have minimal lust, his level of lust must be lower than ordinary human, which is to say he can copulate to procreate. What about lusty stimulation (masturbating) then?
By right a buddhist must give it up, if not, I won't say he's wrong either. Here are some guidelines about stimulation, what are the other area he must observe strictly:
1.MUST NOT flirt with opposite gender
2.MUST NOT engage in adultery
3.MUST NOT engage in permarital copultion
4.MUST NOT be addicted to stimulation
5.any upper part of the body MUST NOT touch the lower organ in contact
6.if a layperson is lusty, he MUST try to behave as morally upright as possible, and as mature, in public
From the mundane viewpoint yes.Originally posted by paperflower:Ikkyu's poem sounds more like a cheeky poem than an enlightened one. don't find any impressiveness or wisdom in it except for his witty sense of describing lust and making love in a mundane way.
to add on, it sounds more porno than being enlightened.Originally posted by paperflower:Ikkyu's poem sounds more like a cheeky poem than an enlightened one. don't find any impressiveness or wisdom in it except for his witty sense of describing lust and making love in a mundane way.
Enlightened men are no longer bound by any conditioned rule/principle/method. Many people do not understand this point. That's why many crazy masters who are highly enlightened get mistaken.Originally posted by paperflower:to add on, it sounds more porno than being enlightened.
think this should be put under the "category 3" section that falls for dirty jokes and poems. surely not for proper buddhist teachings.
Originally posted by An Eternal Now:Enlightened men are no longer bound by any conditioned rule/principle/method. Many people do not understand this point. That's why many crazy masters who are highly enlightened get mistaken.
Not to mention, there are seemingly "crazy" masters in modern times. Ever heard of Chogyam Trungpa? He is really enlightened too.
Of cos not la...Originally posted by paperflower:is it really uh?
think i also can come up with one crazy poem. not that i'm implying i am wise or enlightened which i am not, think when you put your heart and mind into a topic deeply, anyone also can come up with one original poem thats speaks the mind the heart and the things around.
hahaaa
All enlightened masters get mistaken by unenlightened people.Originally posted by An Eternal Now:Enlightened men are no longer bound by any conditioned rule/principle/method. Many people do not understand this point. That's why many crazy masters who are highly enlightened get mistaken.
Not to mention, there are seemingly "crazy" masters in modern times. Ever heard of Chogyam Trungpa? He is really enlightened too.
On the other hand there are also great masters who are highly and sometimes rigidly disciplined, and they can even appear to reprimand each other.
What is a poem to you?Originally posted by paperflower:is it really uh?
think i also can come up with one crazy poem. not that i'm implying i am wise or enlightened which i am not, think when you put your heart and mind into a topic deeply, anyone also can come up with one original poem thats speaks the mind the heart and the things around.
hahaaa
oh really? i learn something new today.Originally posted by talk_cock:What is a poem to you?
A poem is not a sutra --- it is in fact an antithesis of a sutra.
To speak the heart and the mind, how many people can do that?
please do enlighten me some day.Originally posted by talk_cock:All enlightened masters get mistaken by unenlightened people.
The problem is not with the masters but the mindset of the people.
Mind likes to sleep, and rules help to make sleeping easier.
A poem is a free flow of expression, the author captures his own expression.Originally posted by paperflower:oh really? i learn something new today.
ooops sorry for my unenlightened mind.
of cos i do know whats a poem and a sutra.
to speak the heart and mind, indeed not many can do that. like wise not less can do that too.![]()
i humbly accept your guidance, thank you.Originally posted by talk_cock:A poem is a free flow of expression, the author captures his own expression.
A sutra is a set of teaching for others to follow, the author has to think of those who read it.
If you read the 1st verse of the the Tao De Jing or the Heart Sutra, the author begins with a disclaimer. After the disclaimer, the set of instructions can be taught.
That is true.Originally posted by talk_cock:All enlightened masters get mistaken by unenlightened people.
The problem is not with the masters but the mindset of the people.
Mind likes to sleep, and rules help to make sleeping easier.
i can also firmly point out to you that the problem does lie on the masters as well.Originally posted by talk_cock:All enlightened masters get mistaken by unenlightened people.
The problem is not with the masters but the mindset of the people.
Mind likes to sleep, and rules help to make sleeping easier.