If you put Form is emptiness and emptiness is form together with "The Middle Way" what do you get?Originally posted by sinweiy:even what we think is 'real' if prime to the max, become delusion also. it's natural law of polarity. ie bad if prime to the max become good. good if prime to the max become bad. Buddha was enlightened because of the Middle Way.
realism and delusion are one, ie all in the mind.
beauty/delusion/realism lies in the eyes/mind of the beholder.
Buddha realised that there are 9 consciousness all together. 1-6 is the six senses we know. the 6th is the logical/anlysis mind. the 7th is sub-consciousness of attachment/ego.
8th is a store house of thoughts and memories. the 9th is the non-dual cosmic pure true mind. so 6th consciousness is not always all correct, as/if it's polluted/mixed with 1-5 or the 7th, it's also deluded.
/\
My understanding may not be correct.Originally posted by casino_king:Do you think that there is a very fine line between depending on "intuition" and fantasy/delusion? How do you tell the difference?
I think that intuition is coming to a conclusion without having worked out why you come to the conclusion.Originally posted by surfer188:My understanding may not be correct.
Intuition - Answer/feelings not come from thinking/wanting base.
Fantasy/delusion - Answer/feelings comes from thinking/wanting base.
How to know the difference between Intuition & Fantasy. Always check back if the answer or feelings come from self & not be lead by it. Maybe this clears out some points.
Originally posted by neutral_onliner:This is the dhamma on emptiness by the great maha bodhisattva Guan Shi Yin Pusa to the venerable Sariputta, chief disciple of the Buddha Gotama.
[b]form is emptiness; emptiness is form.form is non other than emptiness as emptiness is non other than form.
what is emptiness ?
what is form ?
Is an empty cup throughly empty?
If so how could it be empty if it full of emptiness?
a cup can only be fully emptied when it emptyed of it own emptiness[/b]
you are not me, how do you know that I would not possibly understand the abstract teachings of this great sutra on emptiness?Originally posted by marcteng:This is the dhamma on emptiness by the great maha bodhisattva Guan Shi Yin Pusa to the venerable Sariputta, chief disciple of the Buddha Gotama.
You and I would not possibly understand the abstract teachings of this great sutra on emptiness.
You might think you know what emptiness is, but I think not.
we only come to know by studying, but doesnt know what that means and its application.
When something is "rich" or "profound" it means that the thing is multi dimensional and has vast and totally different applications.Originally posted by marcteng:This is the dhamma on emptiness by the great maha bodhisattva Guan Shi Yin Pusa to the venerable Sariputta, chief disciple of the Buddha Gotama.
You and I would not possibly understand the abstract teachings of this great sutra on emptiness.
You might think you know what emptiness is, but I think not.
we only come to know by studying, but doesnt know what that means and its application.
reason is simple. you are not 1/10 at the level of wisdom of an arahant, much less a maha pusa.Originally posted by Cenarious:you are not me, how do you know that I would not possibly understand the abstract teachings of this great sutra on emptiness?
How is it much more than that and more?Originally posted by marcteng:reason is simple. you are not 1/10 at the level of wisdom of an arahant, much less a maha pusa.
it took countless how many eons for Guan Shi Yin Pusa to practise perfections to understand what emptiness is.
I listened to a monk lecture, those sutras were expounded by Buddha and Pusa's cos they have attained supreme enlightenment.
Do you think you have reach that stage yet? I think no pal, no offence.
we just merely study what emptiness is, but do not understand what it is.
studying and realisation are 2 different matters.
you study u gain knowledge, but realisation is not gain by merely studying.
It is much more than that and more.
