The married clergy is common in some of the lineage holder of tibetan BuddhismOriginally posted by laoda99:so the Sakya Trizin who is a married Clergy as said by bohirici is a monk or not?
Orh...Originally posted by bohiruci:-deleted-
the following url are not recognised by the Buddhist Forum of Compassion Affinity and Buddha_Mandala_Blessings
they contained too many half-truths and distortion to the faith
Moderator ,please have that url removed and added into list of banned articles ..![]()
![]()
Originally posted by neutral_onliner:Agreed. Situations had change in the recent years. many Tibetan traditions are starting to take up vegetarian diet following china, as now vegetarian food can be obtain much easier than before due to modernization. And also due to modernization, more animal are being killed for food. so we Buddhist should become vegetarian now to reduce the common karma of the world.
In Tibet, there is an additional factor to consider: due to the high altitude and harsh climate, there is little to eat besides ground barley, dairy products and meat. To stay alive, the people have to eat meat. [b]His Holiness the Dalai Lama has encouraged those Tibetans in exile, who now live in countries where vegetables and fruits are more plentiful, to refrain from eating meat whenever possible. Also, if a practitioner has severe problems with his/her health due to not eating meat, then the master may give permission to take it. Thus, each person must check his/her own level of practice and bodily requirements and eat accordingly.
The fact that there is such variety within the Buddhist doctrine attests to the BuddhaÂ’s skill in being able to guide people according to their dispositions and needs. It is extremely important not to be partial and sectarian, but to have respect for all the traditions and their practitioners.
[/b]

even Da da vinci code is for christians to read and understand. EH there got mention some churches encourage their members to watch the movie and understand what is right or wrong through their faith.Originally posted by MobyDog:Sad that that you deleted that link, where there were many references to consider, when I was somewhat challenged by the very poster requesting it.
It's a interpretation of Old Tibetian History contrary to yours... white washing it with reason such as "not recognised by the Buddhist Forum of Compassion Affinity and Buddha_Mandala_Blessings'... is indeed a cheap shot.. and does not reflect history at all. While you yourself went ahead and criticise other points/regime. Instead of countering the so-called half truth and distortion of faith.. what's your proof.. you choose censoring... I even took heart not to quote anything from the Chinese website.. as you said are bias. Those reference were made by western travellers who were there in those Era.
Are you advocating that this Web Forum should be a self-importance politically correct outlet... that others are not truthful.... I'm a free thinker, but have some buddhist education in school... Face up to the fact that even if you consider something as half-truth, may still be some truth... meditation do not help delibrate ignorance, and choosing a close mindset defy the purpose of meditation of emptinese to find the truth. (a bit rusty, but somewhat there)
BTW, the C!A part was confessed by the former C!A operative himself in his bio/book... and it is well documented.
In fact , the article is about history and demography... unlike the Da Vinci Code that challenge the religious believe .... placing it upon buddhist forums as authority is indeed irrelevant.
so It is best you posted outside the Wisdom Bliss forumOriginally posted by MobyDog:Sad that that you deleted that link, where there were many references to consider, when I was somewhat challenged by the very poster requesting it.
It's a interpretation of Old Tibetian History contrary to yours... white washing it with reason such as "not recognised by the Buddhist Forum of Compassion Affinity and Buddha_Mandala_Blessings'... is indeed a cheap shot.. and does not reflect history at all. While you yourself went ahead and criticise other points/regime. Instead of countering the so-called half truth and distortion of faith.. what's your proof.. you choose censoring... I even took heart not to quote anything from the Chinese website.. as you said are bias. Those reference were made by western travellers who were there in those Era.
Are you advocating that this Web Forum should be a self-importance politically correct outlet... that others are not truthful.... I'm a free thinker, but have some buddhist education in school... Face up to the fact that even if you consider something as half-truth, may still be some truth... meditation do not help delibrate ignorance, and choosing a close mindset defy the purpose of meditation of emptinese to find the truth. (a bit rusty, but somewhat there)
BTW, the C!A part was confessed by the former C!A operative himself in his bio/book... and it is well documented.
In fact , the article is about history and demography... unlike the Da Vinci Code that challenge the religious believe .... placing it upon buddhist forums as authority is indeed irrelevant.
Originally posted by bohiruciTalking about truth, the article was not about any attacked on buddhism. Never have I said as such.. you did.
I dun believe this got to do with practice in Buddhism ,and that author attacked buddhism ,but give chance to Roman Catholicism for their Inquisition
So does it mean bias ? your sense ? or their sense ...and you... I sensed deep hatre for the Chinese.. where's your benevolence ? so you decided based on your senses.... which sense the sixth ?
sound plausible at time when I read that Michael articlesI have pointed out that you should explore his references, apart from his writings. since you requested that the article be removed ... others can't participate and decide.
the rest , you decide .
Seriously , if you are so insistent on your views , why not go to India to rebuke Dalai Lama ,you will see the foolish actions of yourselfIt is in my view that one must face up to facts... not censorship.
This is Wisdom Bliss ,not Wisdom Blame ... mind youYou seemed to be the one indulged in blame... and do not entertain views which are counter to yours... and wish to live a life of ignorance.![]()
hahahaahaOriginally posted by MobyDog:You seemed to be the one indulged in blame... and do not entertain views which are counter to yours... and wish to live a life of ignorance.
We are not censoring , we are to protect the Pure mind of the Interested Buddhist by all this seemingly truth but yet half-truth.I am disputing the old Tibet's history ... not against Buddhism. You confused by your above statement.....
How well you know about Buddhism ?As of your good self.
If you read Buddhism ,you should know the consequence(karma) of wrong view and what will resulted ..needless for me to say
Again you have denied the fact many tibetan was innocently killed ,which I said it is just an excuse for the Commies to attack TibetI have not denied killing occurred.. please read carefully.
Ask you a question ,if you are feeling itchy with your left hand ,which whole of your left hand is bleeding with the sores open from scratching , would you chop off your hand just to stop the pain ,as you have to travel a long distance to town to see the doctor ?You must really free yourself before giving any statement..... seriously. You need more guidance.
the same itchy hand apply to the annexation of China by Tibet
correction , not bowl but plateOriginally posted by Ito_^:lamas can oso cut people heads off with flying bowls.![]()
well ,Originally posted by MobyDog:You must really free yourself before giving any statement..... seriously. You need more guidance.
you check your history books. get your facts right 1st before telling someone off. understand?Originally posted by bohiruci:I would like to know who said Tibet have slavery and torture slaves ??
there is no prove
However , the cultural revolution leave 300,000 people dead
mostly are monk .
How come mostly monk died ?
can that someone please use a brain to think before writing
It hurts the family of those who died sadly
so you are here to rebuke me ?Originally posted by killstyle:you check your history books. get your facts right 1st before telling someone off. understand?
Originally posted by paperflower:
what matters most is TODAY, NOW.....
that matters......
past is past..... forgive but don't forget cos we must remember the lessons and try not to repeat mistakes again. then again, trying is not enough, we ought not to repeat the mistakes again.
forget is also not bringing them along with us but we are also always aware of the consequences that happened to those who suffered. thats when the apportunities for the heart and mind to practice benevolence and compassion comes in..... cultivation is the steps.... mastery is the ultimate.
we are not dead. we are still alive.[/b]