NargarjunaÂ’s Sixty Verses of Arguments (spinoff)
-
So you are saying that Buddhism only says this universe is not real (inherently empty) but does not say what is real?Originally posted by sinweiy:(indeed)...i'am, you are, they are too ..etcs.
/\ -
Originally posted by casino_king:
actually i was trying to say my range of answer is too wide to fix. while u play reduction (wu wei) so as to pin point an answer, i play expansion (you wei) so as to infinitum the answer.
So you are saying that Buddhism only says this universe is not real (inherently empty) but does not say what is real?
in the Mind-Only School (Yogacara), there are 94 you wei(have origination and destruction) and 6 wu wei (no origination or destruction). not sure the exact translation for the 6 wu wei though.
real or not, eventually it is upto mind only,( hence i, you , them.)
http://www.bfnn.org/bookgb/books3/2092.htm
1 person argue, it is the flag that move, another person argue it's the wind that make it move. wat late Master Hui Neng say?
/\ -
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by casino_king:
Can anybody be carefree if he does not know reality?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Originally posted by sinweiy:
a folly who do not know, cannot, but the wise can.
i can say yes, with a set of reasoning;
and i can say no, with another set of reasoning.
can u?
as to the wise, to know reality is Not to know reality.
so is the anybody a folly or a wise?
/\ -
-
....