All these levels refer to only 1 sequence... NOWOriginally posted by la lapine blanche:I am not quite sure if I have understood this right but it seems to me that these are the various levels you can "attain" through the practice of Buddhism (I know attain is not quite the right word) ...
Enlightenment - the ultimate attainment where you have deep insight into interconnectedness, etc.
Higher rebirth - where you do quite well at accumulating positive karma but don't quite attain enlightenment - so you might go to the god realm for example.
Human rebirth - where you get another go at a human life which is quite good.
Animal rebirth - not good because you can't practise spiritually.
Lower realms - not good.
I need to know that if I try to follow Buddhism but I never attain enlightenment will my practise have counted for something and will it increase my chances in the next life at least? Also is it better to be reborn as a human than a god because humans are in best position to achieve enlightenment?
Hope this makes sense - thanks
Originally posted by la lapine blanche:Amituofo!
I need to know that if I try to follow Buddhism but I never attain enlightenment will my practise have counted for something and will it increase my chances in the next life at least? Also is it better to be reborn as a human than a god because humans are in best position to achieve enlightenment?
Hope this makes sense - thanks
To attain rebirth in higher realms and to avoid lower realms, basically we have to do two things: to avoid breaking the 5 precepts, and to perform the 10 Virtuous Deeds.Originally posted by la lapine blanche:I am not quite sure if I have understood this right but it seems to me that these are the various levels you can "attain" through the practice of Buddhism (I know attain is not quite the right word) ...
Enlightenment - the ultimate attainment where you have deep insight into interconnectedness, etc.
Higher rebirth - where you do quite well at accumulating positive karma but don't quite attain enlightenment - so you might go to the god realm for example.
Human rebirth - where you get another go at a human life which is quite good.
Animal rebirth - not good because you can't practise spiritually.
Lower realms - not good.
I need to know that if I try to follow Buddhism but I never attain enlightenment will my practise have counted for something and will it increase my chances in the next life at least? Also is it better to be reborn as a human than a god because humans are in best position to achieve enlightenment?
Hope this makes sense - thanks
dear la lapine , your practice will be "stored" and waiting for the opportunities to arise
I need to know that if I try to follow Buddhism but I never attain enlightenment will my practise have counted for something and will it increase my chances in the next life at least? Also is it better to be reborn as a human than a god because humans are in best position to achieve enlightenment?
Hope this makes sense - thanks[/b]
Heh why do u think "attain" is not the right word?Originally posted by la lapine blanche:I am not quite sure if I have understood this right but it seems to me that these are the various levels you can "attain" through the practice of Buddhism (I know attain is not quite the right word) ...
Enlightenment - the ultimate attainment where you have deep insight into interconnectedness, etc.
Higher rebirth - where you do quite well at accumulating positive karma but don't quite attain enlightenment - so you might go to the god realm for example.
Human rebirth - where you get another go at a human life which is quite good.
Animal rebirth - not good because you can't practise spiritually.
Lower realms - not good.
I need to know that if I try to follow Buddhism but I never attain enlightenment will my practise have counted for something and will it increase my chances in the next life at least? Also is it better to be reborn as a human than a god because humans are in best position to achieve enlightenment?
Hope this makes sense - thanks
Yes thats right... no attainment, no attainer, the stages are described as skillful means to lead sentient beings to Buddhahood.Originally posted by la lapine blanche:I think "attain" is not quite right because my understanding is that it is wrong to think of enlightenment as something you achieve, like a medal or a certificate. It is more discovering something inside you that was always there to begin with?
Actually I do feel otherwise. Attain could still be right cause one meaning is to arrive. There are many stages to go through before one can finally self realise. So it's like a landmark, a target for sentient beings to benchmark. Anyway, these are just language descriptions, which could never describe the actual process leading to it.Originally posted by An Eternal Now:Yes thats right... no attainment, no attainer, the stages are described as skillful means to lead sentient beings to Buddhahood.
From our sentient being's understanding/relative level of understanding, there are many levels.Originally posted by coolbluewater:Actually I do feel otherwise. Attain could still be right cause one meaning is to arrive. There are many stages to go through before one can finally self realise. So it's like a landmark, a target for sentient beings to benchmark. Anyway, these are just language descriptions, which could never describe the actual process leading to it.
I personally thought the stages are difficult to conceptualise. It all depends on self cultivational experience. My understanding is that there's no specific description of these stages, it's like once you are there, either you know it or you don't. If in doubt, can approach someone whom you know have that knowledge/wisdom, so that you know you are still on the correct path. Books provides a guideline, and examples, and will help if you can grasp the idea behind it.Originally posted by la lapine blanche:Is it the case that people at early stages need concepts/signposts but eventually you go beyond this ...
I feel confused about this because I am reading buddhist books, trying to understand concepts written by Buddhists, whilst also reading that concepts are meaningless anyway.
Am I right in saying that the concepts are just "skillful means" for beginners like me, of value on one level?
They should be applied and practised in our everyday living...Originally posted by la lapine blanche:Is it the case that people at early stages need concepts/signposts but eventually you go beyond this ...
I feel confused about this because I am reading buddhist books, trying to understand concepts written by Buddhists, whilst also reading that concepts are meaningless anyway.
Am I right in saying that the concepts are just "skillful means" for beginners like me, of value on one level?
GreatOriginally posted by la lapine blanche:I am reading everything I can by Thich Nhat Hanh at the moment. I tried to read "Zen Keys" but to be honest I am struggling to understand it ... "The Miracle of Mindfulness" is more on my level, it's about how to be mindful/aware in your everyday life.
Yes, mindfulness should be practised 24/7... it is much an essential thing in Buddhism. It's ok if there are certain things you do not understand, I myself do not understand many things, but when we "attain" enlightenment, the entire Tripitaka will be understood by us.Originally posted by la lapine blanche:I am reading everything I can by Thich Nhat Hanh at the moment. I tried to read "Zen Keys" but to be honest I am struggling to understand it ... "The Miracle of Mindfulness" is more on my level, it's about how to be mindful/aware in your everyday life.
Zen Buddhism is based on Mahayana. Both Mahayana and Theravada uses the Tripitaka (3 baskets), the major difference being that Mahayana has some additional Mahayana sutras, for example, Heart Sutra, Diamond Sutra, Lankavatara Sutra, Lotus Sutra, Shurangama Sutra, etc etc.Originally posted by la lapine blanche:That makes sense. I am content to practise mindfulness for now because I feel that the difficult things will make sense later.
One thing I am confused about though - and it sounds very basic - is Zen based on Mahayana, Theravada or both? Is it ony Theravada that uses the Tripitaka?
Thanks. This forum is great, I'm going to recommend it to my Sangha.
Cool.. glad you've found a Thich Nhat Hanh SanghaOriginally posted by la lapine blanche:I have joined a Sangha called the Blue Lotus Sangha which is part of the Community of Interbeing (Thich Nhat Hanh). I am hoping to receive the Five Mindfulness Trainings some time this year.
Hi pal how's the weather in Ireland nowOriginally posted by la lapine blanche:Thanks. It's a really helpful Sangha. I'm learning a lot from this forum too, though - it's like my e-Sangha! Lots of v knowledgeable people. Thanks to all moderators who take the time to run it.