Which Mind are you?Can you point to one moment of your Mind that always has been and always will be you? Are you yesterday's Mind? Today's Mind? Tomorrow's Mind?Originally posted by Cenarious:without the mind there would be nothing.
Awareness is not behind the mind. The mystics who describe this thinks that there is an observer(self) watching the mind(thoughts)... This is I AM. I also thought so too in the past... until Thusness probed me to re-investigate the dynamics in deep meditation again.Originally posted by Cenarious:did I say I was a mind? I am the awareness behind the mind.
The reality of the unreal is pure awareness, in reality, there is no such thing as mind. The mind looks real but it is not real. So there is no awareness behind the mind - there is ONLY awareness at the highest level, nothing is seperate from it.Originally posted by neutral_onliner:Which Mind are you?Can you point to one moment of your Mind that always has been and always will be you?[b] Are you yesterday's Mind? Today's Mind? Tomorrow's Mind?[/b][/quote]
Yes, so from this we know that mind is illusory, unreal, and does not exist, or rather - empty of inherent existence.
[quote]Originally posted by Cenarious:
did I say I was a mind? I am the awareness behind the mind.
People tends to treat an ability which very few people are able to do as supernatural power.Originally posted by Cenarious:buddhism sounds boring now. where is my supernatural power
Relax my friend.Originally posted by Cenarious:buddhism sounds boring now. where is my supernatural power
You will be disappointed by the term "supernatural power" in buddhismOriginally posted by Cenarious:buddhism sounds boring now. where is my supernatural power
If you have read about controlling energies in buddhism I guess that fit into your definition of supernatural powerOriginally posted by Cenarious:so buddhism is just one big big round of bush beating to tell you it doesnt matter and just suc.k it up becos u dont exist
NopeOriginally posted by Cenarious:so buddhism is just one big big round of bush beating to tell you it doesnt matter and just suc.k it up becos u dont exist
no self study what, we're all a bunch of soulless things walking around so it wont matter if i killed a bunch of babiesOriginally posted by neutral_onliner:Nope
When you study Buddhism, you are studying yourself, the nature of your own mind. Instead of focusing on some supreme being, Buddhism focuses on more practical matters, such as how to lead your life, how to integrate your mind and how to keep your everyday mind peaceful and healthy. In other words, Buddhism always emphasizes experiential knowledge-wisdom rather than some dogmatic view.
It not no self but non-selfOriginally posted by Cenarious:no self study what, we're all a bunch of soulless things walking around so it wont matter if i killed a bunch of babies
man i would have gone to taoism if i wanted to be this extreme
excusesOriginally posted by neutral_onliner:It not no self but non-self
relax my frend the concept of non self ...i noe is not easily to understand but by understanding this reality will enable us to slowly progress in our path and the see things as they really are.Originally posted by Cenarious:excuses
ya im waitingOriginally posted by neutral_onliner:relax my frend the concept of non self ...i noe is not easily to understand but by understanding this reality will enable us to slowly progress in our path and the see things as they really are.
since we r here i try to help u to understand the very basic part ok ?![]()
It inherently existentOriginally posted by Cenarious:ya im waiting
All actions sourced from one's thought, which is rooted in our mind. We think, we thought, we perceived, our emotions, is all controled by this place in our skull. Without it, we will be a walking zombies. With it, we could move towards anywhere between the plane of good and evil.Originally posted by Cenarious:no self study what, we're all a bunch of soulless things walking around so it wont matter if i killed a bunch of babies
man i would have gone to taoism if i wanted to be this extreme
And honestly supernatural powers sound quite boring to me, I dont know whats the hype about it. Supernatural powers can only be developed through meditative practises, and according to Buddha it is quite a waste of effort to try to develope them on purpose. It should be a byproduct of Precepts, Samadhi and Wisdom cultivation.Originally posted by Cenarious:buddhism sounds boring now. where is my supernatural power
That is not what non-volition/non-action or Wu Wei in Taoism means. In fact non-volition in Taoism is quite similar to Buddhism, where there is action but no doer, which means spontaneity. Spontaneous action, Wei Wu Wei, is liberating. It is true that one who can completely master non-volition (i.e an Arhant) no longer creates karma but that does not mean he will be wreakless in actions. But it does not mean one can escape cause and effect.Originally posted by Cenarious:no self study what, we're all a bunch of soulless things walking around so it wont matter if i killed a bunch of babies
man i would have gone to taoism if i wanted to be this extreme
-------After the assembly had departed, Master Pai Chang noticed an old man who stayed behind. The master asked who he was. “Not a human being sir, but the spirit of a wild fox. I used to be the head monk here. One day I was asked, “Does one who practices still become involved in karma?” I replied, “No, he is free of karma.” For this answer, I earned the karma of being reborn with the spirit of a wild fox for 500 years and have not been able to shake it. Please liberate me by enlightening me on this matter.”
The master said, “Go ahead and ask me the same question.” So the fox asked, “Does one who practices still become involved in karma?” Pai Chang replied, “He is not blind to cause and effect.”
The fox was greatly awakened and prostrated before the Master saying, “Thank you. Your answer has liberated me from the fox’s body. I live in a hollow on the mountain and would ask you to grant me the usual rites for a dead monk.” The next day, Pai Chang climbed the mountain behind his monastery, and in a small grotto, he discovered a dead fox for whom the usual ceremony for a dead monk was held.
-loosely rendered from The Transmission of the Lamp, this story is also found in other Ch'an collections. Shiloh-x[/quote]
-----
From: View & ConductOriginally posted by An Eternal Now:-------
http://www.jenchen.org.sg/vol8no3c.htm
'All phenomena arise by the aggregation of causes and conditions; all phenomena cease by the dispersion of causes and conditions.' How do we apply this Law of Causality?
Using the family to illustrate the Law of Causality, a family is established as a result of the aggregation of causes and conditions. Since the family has already been brought about by these various causes and conditions, we should therefore live peacefully and joyfully as a family. Fulfilling this positive causality for the family will leave us with no regrets in the future.
We shouldn't reckon presume that 'all forms are empty' (Buddhist philosophy that all things and phenomena are empty because they don't have an independent nature of their own.); you are 'empty', I am also 'empty' and we are all 'empty', and so we don't care about anything. This is wrong. Since all things result from aggregations of causes and conditions we must make good use of these causes and conditions.
As another example, it is only because I am here to give a Dharma talk that this bouquet of flowers has been prepared. Therefore, we should place these flowers nicely on the table so that people can appreciate them. If while we are admiring the flowers, a person comes by and declares, "Sigh, all phenomena arising from causes and conditions are empty. What use is there in having such a beautiful bouquet of flowers?" He then removes it and throws it away. This person may not be of sound mind, because by now you know about the Law of Causality, and you say that the flowers are empty. But, you are still physically here. You, as a 'person' have not emptied away! So how could you say that the flowers are empty? Therefore, you should diligently learn and practise what the Buddha taught, and cultivate. First of all empty the sentient being (i.e. the arising and ceasing of thoughts and feelings) within you, and then you will not find that things in the world are contradictory.
So from this, we see how that which is seemingly contradictory in the world, stems from failure to properly grasp the principles. Because when the principles have not been correctly understood, there cannot be coherence in their application to matters of the world. This leads to lack of roundedness and harmony in the way we deal with things.
[quote]Originally posted by longchen:Do not lose the view of the Dharmakaya while in action... or we will not be liberated.
While in the Dharmakaya viewpoint, do not lose conduct(discriminative right action) or we will accumulate karma.
Originally posted by _wanderer_:Basically I think the View refers to the Ultimate View (some call it View of Emptiness, some call it Primordial Wisdom, others call it something else...). I think Padmasambhava is reminding us not to get lost in conduct, thinking that there is "something truly virtuous" to adopt and "something truly nonvirtuous" to abandon in our conduct/actions. This means, while we are adopting virtues and abandoning nonvirtuous we should bear the View of Emptiness in mind, that NO truly existing person is performing any truly existing action towards any truly existing party.
However, having embraced this View of Emptiness, as what Longchen said, we should not think that we don't need to care about performing virtuous or nonvirtuous actions, because for us the unenlightened beings, we're still bound by karma. So though aware of the "lack of an inherent truly existing nature" of virtues and nonvirtues, we should still try to adopt virtuous behaviour and abandon nonvirtuous behaviour.
Thanks for all the sharing Longchen, Sinwei and Eternal Now. I found it kinda surprising and very interesting that diff pple have diff interpretations. I believe such sharings can help all of us sharpen our understanding of the Dharma and motivate one another to apply and actualize them.![]()
i can already control my mind and thoughts.Originally posted by path_seeker:All actions sourced from one's thought, which is rooted in our mind. We think, we thought, we perceived, our emotions, is all controled by this place in our skull. Without it, we will be a walking zombies. With it, we could move towards anywhere between the plane of good and evil.
Everytime we do something, our mind form impressions, and that impression could lead us to our next action, maybe an argument with the person infront of you, or a hug with the person sitting next to you.
Taming the mind is like restraining an wild horse. You can supress this thought and another arises. We are so used to not letting our brain rest, when u really want to go into a thoughtless stage, your head just couldn't get use to it.
Understanding your mind doesn't make you soulless, but rather, makes you mindful of what you are, and where you are.![]()
The ability to control thoughts is very limited especially for non-meditators. For example sometimes a song gets caught in your head, can you control it and stop it from arising again? It can even be quite frustrating. But on a higher level of practise, effort is not needed to 'control thoughts'.Originally posted by Cenarious:i can already control my mind and thoughts.