The Limitation of science in dealing with Reality
As Beings, the conventional mind only sees interpretations of Reality.
Why is this so? This is because, firstly Sensory data are interpretations(manifested form) of reality. Why are they interpretations and are not the direct experiencing of it (Reality)? To illustrate this point...lets consider the perception of 2 person: a color-blind person and one with normal vision. The color-blind person may sees images differently from one who is not. So... who is seeing the truth?...none. Both are seeing interpretations(manifested form) of the Truth. Likewise animals may see and sense things differently from humans.
Sensory datas that are being percieved are in turn cognated by the conventional mind. Again, the conventional mind sees interpretations collected by sensory perception. From the sensory datas, the conventional mind conceive the informations into things, environments and people... A simplified example is that by differentiating the changes in colours on the vision sight, the conventional mind cognate edges... with the edges connected... the enclosed area become percieved as objects, things, entities...
The conventional mind can only theorizes from its interpretations. Science is based on the theory and concepts derived from the conventional mind.
Science is just that... conceptual framework for understanding the dynamics of Reality... But it can only theorizes using concepts.
To truly experience Reality...one must go beyond thinking (which is theorising) about Reality. We must experience it directly.
PS: From the way that I have written... some people might have the misconceptions that the Source(Reality) is separated from us. This is clearly not so. It is the conventional discriminating mind that think in terms of separation and duality. However, the conventional discriminating mind itself is not an entity, but is just the dualistic function of cognition.
Oh... You found it.Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:I should start a thread on the limitation of Buddhism dealing with reality....![]()
Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:sure, that would be interesting.
I should start a thread on the limitation of Buddhism dealing with reality....[/b]
I only found a piece of unintelligent posting.Originally posted by longchen:Oh... You found it.
This article was written especially for you...
Hope that you can read it SLOWLY and CLEARLY.
As far as i see it there is nothing wrong with his posting. So if you think otherwise you need to explain why.Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:I only found a piece of unintelligent posting.
He purposes that reality exceeds our sensory albilities.... What happens when reality equals our sensory albilities?Originally posted by An Eternal Now:As far as i see it there is nothing wrong with his posting. So if you think otherwise you need to explain why.
The sensorial experience is the manifested aspects of Reality. However, our cognitive conventional mind very seldom get to experience them in the raw state. That is... the conventional mind seldom gets to experience them as 'it is'. Experiencing them as 'they really are' is very different from expereincing them thru the distortions of the conventional mind.Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:He purposes that reality exceeds our sensory albilities.... What happens when reality equals our sensory albilities?
Then you need to understand what is buddhism first.Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:I should start a thread on the limitation of Buddhism dealing with reality....![]()
I think your mind is distorted... For most purposes, your normal sensory perception is adequate.Originally posted by longchen:The sensorial experience is the manifested aspects of Reality. However, our cognitive conventional mind very seldom get to experience them in the raw state. That is... the conventional mind seldom gets to experience them as 'it is'. Experiencing them as 'they really are' is very different from expereincing them thru the distortions of the conventional mind.
After the last quote from longchen, I don't think I want to know unless I wish to have a lenghty stay in IMH.Originally posted by justdoit77:Then you need to understand what is buddhism first.
I understand your pain...Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:After the last quote from longchen, I don't think I want to know unless I wish to have a lenghty stay in IMH.
His last quote is a bit chim, if you can't digest it, you can always start from the basic buddhism teaching.Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:After the last quote from longchen, I don't think I want to know unless I wish to have a lenghty stay in IMH.
The best way to understand the strengths of a philosophy is to attempt to refute it!Originally posted by justdoit77:His last quote is a bit chim, if you can't digest it, you can always start from the basic buddhism teaching.
Things like keeping precepts, do good and avoid evils are rather simple to understand.
I will look forward to see your thread on "limitation of buddhism in dealing with reality or XYZ"
Any form of dharma debate is always welcome, just like what happened in tibet buddhism monastries.
As I said:" What makes you think you are not experiencing them as they really are?"Originally posted by longchen:The sensorial experience is the manifested aspects of Reality. However, our cognitive conventional mind very seldom get to experience them in the raw state. That is... the conventional mind seldom gets to experience them as 'it is'. Experiencing them as 'they really are' is very different from expereincing them thru the distortions of the conventional mind.