What's wrong with this pic?
-
Oh, so you weren't answering my question? OK. But in order for me to prove to you that you were indeed trolling, I first need your understanding in your own posts. I need to know if you were prejudiced when you saidOriginally posted by laurence82:Nope
There is no agreement there is prejudice. Therefore the rest of the statements are moot.
Try again. By the way, labelling again...take up one quote and say they are prejudiced, now its agreement to prejudice. How low can you sink?
"Despite several explainations, someone insist on continuing his old way
Sigh"
So do you agree or not agree that you were prejudiced? -
WtfOriginally posted by Cenarious:Oh, so you weren't answering my question? OK. But in order for me to prove to you that you were indeed trolling, I first need your understanding in your own posts. I need to know if you were prejudiced when you said
"Despite several explainations, someone insist on continuing his old way
Sigh"
So do you agree or not agree that you were prejudiced?
u asked this for second time today, i told you go dig the post
i even gave u clue about AEN and my posted links and stuff
Are you drunk??????????? -
Seriously, is there nuthing to dig?
In conclusion, you cant prove, even worse, u digging up questions in which the answers had been posted..and you have to do this exercise twice!!!! -
The one about him previously making another thread? I don't know if he was trolling in that thread, so if you could, please link me to that thread so I can see it.Originally posted by laurence82:Wtf
u asked this for second time today, i told you go dig the post
i even gave u clue about AEN and my posted links and stuff
Are you drunk???????????
But then again, let's say if he WAS indeed trolling in that old thread, would you be considered prejudiced when you were saying this?
"Despite several explainations, someone insist on continuing his old way
Sigh" -
The thread has been posted, again go digOriginally posted by Cenarious:The one about him previously making another thread? I don't know if he was trolling in that thread, so if you could, please link me to that thread so I can see it.
But then again, let's say if he WAS indeed trolling in that old thread, would you be considered prejudiced when you were saying this?
"Despite several explainations, someone insist on continuing his old way
Sigh"
And you will find that the old thread AEN also wanted to post to show, i beat him to it...you will see. if you really dig, coz its easy to see
As for the second question, you have posted this for the third time now...which answers are very well provided....stop playing -
Oh, so it was that thread. We shall not dwell into the old thread now because we have another issue to talk about.Originally posted by laurence82:The thread has been posted, again go dig
And you will find that the old thread AEN also wanted to post to show, i beat him to it...you will see. if you really dig, coz its easy to see
As for the second question, you have posted this for the third time now...which answers are very well provided....stop playing
As for the 2nd question, let's say that he WAS indeed trolling in the old topic. Since you say that answers are very well-provided, I take it to mean that you were indeed showing prejudice, because you think that he was indeed trolling in the old topic.
Now I ask you: Does prejudice help in helping NT2 understand more about the religion? -
You cant prove prejudice, so the rest of the statements are moot. In fact, how can answers are well provided = prejudiced? In fact, you can read my mind, since you said 'you think'???Originally posted by Cenarious:Oh, so it was that thread. We shall not dwell into the old thread now because we have another issue to talk about.
As for the 2nd question, let's say that he WAS indeed trolling in the old topic. Since you say that answers are very well-provided, I take it to mean that you were indeed showing prejudice, because you think that he was indeed trolling in the old topic.
Now I ask you: Does prejudice help in helping NT2 understand more about the religion?
Strangely, this issue been dug up for second time.
I hate to keep bean counters here
-
Because from what I see, you haven't told me if you were being prejudiced or not, but instead you show me an old thread. That can only mean you think he was trolling in the old thread (or else you think he was being stupid by asking questions about buddhism?) You refused to give me a direct answer, so I can only guess.Originally posted by laurence82:You cant prove prejudice, so the rest of the statements are moot. In fact, how can answers are well provided = prejudiced? In fact, you can read my mind, since you said 'you think'???
Strangely, this issue been dug up for second time.
I hate to keep bean counters here
So do you consider yourself prejudiced? -
Again, there were three factors, those were the clues. You choose to harp only on old thread.Originally posted by Cenarious:Because from what I see, you haven't told me if you were being prejudiced or not, but instead you show me an old thread. That can only mean you think he was trolling in the old thread (or else you think he was being stupid by asking questions about buddhism?) You refused to give me a direct answer, so I can only guess.
So do you consider yourself prejudiced?
These were answers. So when an answer is not clear, you make assumptions. In fact, the answer is damn clear. So, in conclusion, you made assumptions and called me troll, prejudiced and a private organ. Therefore, by this name calling alone without objective discussion, i still reserve the right to call you troll.
Simple and sweet
-
Alright, take it that I am incapable of recognizing the other 2 factors. Would you mind showing me the other 2 factors again? I looked through the whole thread and I couldn't find them.Originally posted by laurence82:Again, there were three factors, those were the clues. You choose to harp only on old thread.
These were answers. So when an answer is not clear, you make assumptions. In fact, the answer is damn clear. So, in conclusion, you made assumptions and called me troll, prejudiced and a private organ. Therefore, by this name calling alone without objective discussion, i still reserve the right to call you troll.
Simple and sweet -
It was even brought up today, and i said these were cluesOriginally posted by Cenarious:Alright, take it that I am incapable of recognizing the other 2 factors. Would you mind showing me the other 2 factors again? I looked through the whole thread and I couldn't find them.
Gosh is this 3rd or 4th time?
It was even mentioned at the beginning of today' session.
-
I am really incapable of finding them even in today's posts. Please post them here bare and simple, so that I won't miss them this time.Originally posted by laurence82:It was even brought up today, and i said these were clues
Gosh is this 3rd or 4th time?
It was even mentioned at the beginning of today' session. -
If you dont know the answers, simply, you have no right to guess. Guessing can go anywhere, even for you as an excuse to call me a troll. Having to guess is not a good reason. Period.Originally posted by Cenarious:Because from what I see, you haven't told me if you were being prejudiced or not, but instead you show me an old thread. That can only mean you think he was trolling in the old thread (or else you think he was being stupid by asking questions about buddhism?) You refused to give me a direct answer, so I can only guess.
So do you consider yourself prejudiced?
I showed you an old thread only? i mentioned AEN and the Guan Yin thread for 3rd or 4th time for fun?? And its not just yesterday but today. Sheesh
You got nuthing to dig, or you too lazy to dig, or you simply pursuing a personal rather than an objective agenda against me? Choose one of these three then. -
NopeOriginally posted by Cenarious:I am really incapable of finding them even in today's posts. Please post them here bare and simple, so that I won't miss them this time.
I said it outright.
You labelled me troll, its your responsibilities to find. After so many pages, why only now you admit you cant find?
Worse, you added to the heap today by saying i am creating chaos, and yada yada
You wont get away with it.
-
Alright so there is also a guanyin thread so that makes it 2 factors. Where is the 3rd one?Originally posted by laurence82:If you dont know the answers, simply, you have no right to guess. Guessing can go anywhere, even for you as an excuse to call me a troll. Having to guess is not a good reason. Period.
I showed you an old thread only? i mentioned AEN and the Guan Yin thread for 3rd or 4th time for fun?? And its not just yesterday but today. Sheesh
You got nuthing to dig, or you too lazy to dig, or you simply pursuing a personal rather than an objective agenda against me? Choose one of these three then. -
Originally posted by Cenarious:Alright so there is also a guanyin thread so that makes it 2 factors. Where is the 3rd one?
-
Because if I knew your reasons were sufficient, then I wouldn't have called you a troll. Or maybe I saw them but didn't consider them as valid. People have different paradigms you know? What might seem valid to you may not be valid to me.Originally posted by laurence82:Nope
I said it outright.
You labelled me troll, its your responsibilities to find. After so many pages, why only now you admit you cant find?
So now if you won't tell me outright here what the 3rd factor is, I'm gonna have to ask the rest of the website to pick it out for me. If no one picks it out after a certain amount of time, we're gonna have to settle with just those 2 factors.
Is that alright for you? -
This is nonsense. You said you were guessing. You do not know whether or not there is sufficient reasons or not. Therefore the reason for calling me a troll is inadequate.Originally posted by Cenarious:Because if I knew your reasons were sufficient, then I wouldn't have called you a troll. Or maybe I saw them but didn't consider them as valid. People have different paradigms you know? What might seem valid to you may not be valid to me.
So now if you won't tell me outright here what the 3rd factor is, I'm gonna have to ask the rest of the website to pick it out for me. If no one picks it out after a certain amount of time, we're gonna have to settle with just those 2 factors.
Is that alright for you?
The rest of website? Its between me and you. They didnt call me troll. You did. If you cant see, whereforth you have the sufficient reasons to call me troll? You dont see that its what you think what you have seen and your conclusion that appears after it.
Again, yi ren zuo shi yi ren dang. I dont know man, your reasoning goes awry -
Yes, because all I had was the thread "what is wrong with this pic" episode 1. I thought it was all that you had. So now in order to progress in this discussion I need to know the other 2. Now I know about the guanyin thread, so now I only need the 3rd one.Originally posted by laurence82:This is nonsense. You said you were guessing. You do not know whether or not there is sufficient reasons or not. Therefore the reason for calling me a troll is inadequate.The rest of website? Its between me and you. They didnt call me troll. You did. If you cant see, whereforth you have the sufficient reasons to call me troll? You dont see that its what you think what you have seen and your conclusion that appears after it.
Yes, they didn't call you a troll. This is only between me and you.
However, I can't find the 3rd factor and you won't tell me. So if there is no evidence of a 3rd factor, shouldn't we just discard it? -
Simply lazyOriginally posted by Cenarious:Yes, they didn't call you a troll. This is only between me and you.
However, I can't find the 3rd factor and you won't tell me. So if there is no evidence of a 3rd factor, shouldn't we just discard it?
I said there were three clues, which i gave today, right from the start of today's session.
And no, i wont go with just two simply because two, while not wrong, would lack strength.
These three clues, in fact, were posted in one post, same as yesterday. They were repeated. If you see only the post with the old link, means you have looked wrong. -
Alright, the start of today's session, so I would take it to mean this post:Originally posted by laurence82:Simply lazy
I said there were three clues, which i gave today, right from the start of today's session.
And no, i wont go with just two simply because two, while not wrong, would lack strength.
These three clues, in fact, were posted in one post, same as yesterday. They were repeated. If you see only the post with the old link, means you have looked wrong.
Strange. You know subtlety or not? I think you are just being selective. In any case, if you feel this argument is dumb, why are you continuing even now? You cant prove, and in this case, bring out the quotes and explain how they are troll, yet you talk about me being subtle and all that? Tsk...you are losing touch. You are putting these labels, because you want it to be, not because you have good reasons to do so.
Again, are all these what you said relevant? Why does it matter if i know Buddhism or not? This is personal assasination, pls stick to the issue at hand.
Lastly, you understand what i mean? Seems like the whole time you are just putting labels, take up one sentence, call them trolling, take up another, said they are prejudiced without explaining why.
Again, for all these, i will reserve the right to call you troll, for you made these baseless allegations without proper proof.
Cool
Is the 3rd one about subtlety? -
You know something? I am quite perplexed. Without sufficient reasons, and cant even spot a post for how many pages liao, how do you even arrive at the word 'trolling' seriously?
I dont know, this is a more like a personal agenda.
I am tired of wating for, what now nearly ten pages? SHeesh...
Seriously, and this is sincerely from me, stop wasting your time and go study for your exams.
Since its not an easy task for you to get into poly, bloody cherish your exams and your grades. They matter more to you than coming up with something here. -
Answer my questions, or else you forfeit and admit that you are a troll.Originally posted by laurence82:You know something? I am quite perplexed. Without sufficient reasons, and cant even spot a post for how many pages liao, how do you even arrive at the word 'trolling' seriously?
I dont know, this is a more like a personal agenda.
I am tired of wating for, what now nearly ten pages? SHeesh...
Seriously, and this is sincerely from me, stop wasting your time and go study for your exams.
Since its not an easy task for you to get into poly, bloody cherish your exams and your grades. They matter more to you than coming up with something here. -
Start doesnt mean first. It means over a range of post, although i vividly rem you started with the 192nd post. Should be thereabout.Originally posted by Cenarious:Alright, the start of today's session, so I would take it to mean this post:
Strange. You know subtlety or not? I think you are just being selective. In any case, if you feel this argument is dumb, why are you continuing even now? You cant prove, and in this case, bring out the quotes and explain how they are troll, yet you talk about me being subtle and all that? Tsk...you are losing touch. You are putting these labels, because you want it to be, not because you have good reasons to do so.
Again, are all these what you said relevant? Why does it matter if i know Buddhism or not? This is personal assasination, pls stick to the issue at hand.
Lastly, you understand what i mean? Seems like the whole time you are just putting labels, take up one sentence, call them trolling, take up another, said they are prejudiced without explaining why.
Again, for all these, i will reserve the right to call you troll, for you made these baseless allegations without proper proof.
Cool
Is the 3rd one about subtlety?
And this post above..? Means what? Does it look like three clues? And how its linked to subtlety??? -
Sheesh, you cant even prove, i have reserved that right, and up till now you cant prove!Originally posted by Cenarious:Answer my questions, or else you forfeit and admit that you are a troll.
So this whole thing is about making me go with you in a merry go round right?
Sheesh
Troll!