This is the reason why you have to wait for 10 pages. You deliberately evade all questions in an attempt to get me sick of this, and then you rightfully claim the right to call me a troll. You survive by chaos and evasion.Originally posted by laurence82:Start doesnt mean first. It means over a range of post, although i vividly rem you started with the 192nd post. Should be thereabout.
And this post above..? Means what? Does it look like three clues? And how its linked to subtlety???
NopeOriginally posted by Cenarious:This is the reason why you have to wait for 10 pages. You deliberately evade all questions in an attempt to get me sick of this, and then you rightfully claim the right to call me a troll. You survive by chaos and evasion.
So if you don't want to wait anymore, kindly tell me what I want to know, so that I can prove my point to you, since we seem to have very different paradigms.
Alright, since you dont have enough reasons for "having the right to call me a troll", I shall show paste the link of this topic to every thread that you call me a troll in and let them see how you evade stuff, yet insist that you are right. Good day.Originally posted by laurence82:i dont have time. 11pm will be my cut off time.
If you cant prove by this time, i will keep my right.
No time wasting prolly five six pages, and you cant even dig a post to support your claims.
I reserve the right to keep the timing
Not just because you called me a troll, but because you are also recalcitrant.
But there is no evidence to show that there is a 3rd one! I can also say that there are 5 reasons in this thread that prove my point in calling you a troll.Originally posted by laurence82:i havent evaded. I refuse to repeat my answers so that you can play with me.
You know what? You are shameless. You have conveniently ignored everything, called me a troll for insufficient reason and dare to do this?Originally posted by Cenarious:Alright, since you dont have enough reasons for "having the right to call me a troll", I shall show paste the link of this topic to every thread that you call me a troll in and let them see how you evade stuff, yet insist that you are right. Good day.
There isOriginally posted by Cenarious:But there is no evidence to show that there is a 3rd one! I can also say that there are 5 reasons in this thread that prove my point in calling you a troll.
You deliberately retard the progress of this conversation just so that you can run away claiming to be sick and all. I do not give in to an attitude of this kind.
oh wrong.. 258 now.Originally posted by An Eternal Now:Hi all.. how are you.. im back..
Wow here's another record breaking thing... 11 pages of postings.. 254 replies so far... within less than 2 days in BWB. Super.
Is this sarcasm? I hope notOriginally posted by An Eternal Now:Hi all.. how are you.. im back..
Wow here's another record breaking thing... 11 pages of postings.. 254 replies so far... within less than 2 days in BWB. Super.
yeapOriginally posted by DriftingGuy:I read till page 2 then got lost liao![]()
Read the posting between me and NT2 can liao.. the rest are arguing about whether NT2 is flamingOriginally posted by DriftingGuy:I read till page 2 then got lost liao![]()
Then you owe a treatOriginally posted by An Eternal Now:Hehe nope it's a good thing... now maybe the forum ratings can beat EH.. hmm.. maybe not so soon yet..![]()
Oh? Tell me what I have ignored. You wanted proof, I posted the fine points of my proof but you didn't understand them. I elaborated them further and you still didn't understand them. Now I am giving in to you - that is to go right down to the very bottom of every assumption each of us seem to be making in order to have a fruitful discussion, because you seem to have a totally different set of paradigm from me. Yet you claim to be sick.Originally posted by laurence82:You know what? You are shameless. You have conveniently ignored everything, called me a troll for insufficient reason and dare to do this?
Go ahead, I want people to laugh at you. You fear me calling you troll thats why you want to threaten this right?
Go ahead.
WrongOriginally posted by Cenarious:Oh? Tell me what I have ignored. You wanted proof, I posted the fine points of my proof but you didn't understand them. I elaborated them further and you still didn't understand them. Now I am giving in to you - that is to go right down to the very bottom of every assumption each of us seem to be making in order to have a fruitful discussion, because you seem to have a totally different set of paradigm from me. Yet you claim to be sick.
This thing about claiming what "right" to call me a troll is bullshi.t. You are pushing your troll status onto me. When given evidence you ignore them. When asked for evidence you give me none. Black and white all you say one.
i was abt to say so. frankly i do not know wat r the remaining pages of.Originally posted by An Eternal Now:Read the posting between me and NT2 can liao.. the rest are arguing about whether NT2 is flaming![]()
close it will be easier mah. hahaOriginally posted by An Eternal Now:Ok arh I am not going to close this topic.
From now on anything not related to the topic of "What's wrong with this pic?" will be removed by me or post in somewhere else. Thanks.
Oh ok lor.. closed then.Originally posted by NT2:close it will be easier mah. haha