a) Truth hurts, strange, since when you do care for people feelings?I don't care for people's feelings so you are going to follow me?
b) You have not typed, how to ignore. Merely labelling them is not good enough, You have to have good reason.Since you are blind:
c) See? By admitting you are calling me names, you have adequately provide evidence that you resorting to name calling. This is..trolling, coz there is no objective discussion.Ok, I'm calling you names. That is because you are ignoring (dunno whether you are c0ck eye or what) whatever I have typed for you. There is nothing else I can do other than to call you names.
d) Seriously. If a thief is called a thief, you must provide evidence, ie, a video of him stealing, or logic, ie, if a thing is in the room, and if this chap is the only one in the room, for sure he is the thief.okok, now just look at (b).
Good idea.Originally posted by laurence82:Go and sleep!
Totally irrelevant, because someone who isn't buddhist isn't gonna automatically know which one is right and which is wrong, and they certainly won't memorize your religion. Posting negative comments like the bolded line isn't gonna make people very happy, especially people who are sincerely expecting answers.
Despite several explainations, someone insist on continuing his old way
Sigh
[/quote]
First sign of showing prejudice. This is prejudice because you say that he was a liar, cunning, bad person in the past. But now he was asking a valid question. Aren't you looking at the past and putting a comment on him based on the past and not the present?in the same light, i guess Christians worship money, since they pay pastors a king's ransom?Trolling, although I understand where you're coming from. Being a jerk or trolling means annoying people. Your analogy may be right I know, but it's still trolling.
Laughing
[quote]Similarly, like AEN said for the nth time, such are not Buddhist practicesI question the point of this topic..
he is in polyOriginally posted by laurence82:Finals in end december? Is that a local school?![]()
Not wrong. He did post even the same title, AEN was everywhere explaining, even in the topic he posted a Guan Yin picture. Which part of the post say he was a cunning liar? He is, but not within this post of mine. Extra judicial comments..tsk tsk...Originally posted by Cenarious:kk, i'll break this down for you.
Totally irrelevant, because someone who isn't buddhist isn't gonna automatically know which one is right and which is wrong, and they certainly won't memorize your religion. Posting negative comments like the bolded line isn't gonna make people very happy, especially people who are sincerely expecting answers.
Alright now, if you are going to say I still have no proof you're gonna have to explain a bit, using my replies in this post.
Originally posted by laurence82:My last words are
i am being misquoted and mislabelled without being proven
If i am not being apologised to, i will hold the right to call someone a troll
wherever he is.![]()
u are labelled the troll's friendOriginally posted by An Eternal Now:![]()
Which is exactly describing yourself, by going all over the forums
What is the point of practising a faith, when you have lies, deceit, cunning in your heart?
I am sure religions are not like that. I harbour no hope you will ever change your old ways
I am not subtle, so, I will say it as it is.
Maybe because you are losing your own faith perhaps thats why you are considering Buddhism?
Good for you
Wink
He wasn't pushy, not in a literary sense. I am not so much referring to any of his individual posts. However, the subtle nuances with which he phrases his 'questions' and the nature of the posts he has previsouly made and started, lead me to question whether he is asking his 'questions' in good faith. His later posts subsequently validated my suspicions about his intentions.Originally posted by An Eternal Now:Actually if he is stating his own view it is ok (his reply about Jesus and Christianity is in reply to lau and me, so he is not being pushy). He has not yet started flaming in this topic so I think we should give him some slack.
If you have seen my questions to AEN long long ago on IRC when i was new to buddhism you won't have thought so.Originally posted by Beyond Religion:However, the subtle nuances with which he phrases his 'questions' and the nature of the posts he has previsouly made and started, lead me to question whether he is asking his 'questions' in good faith.
Now I feel like an idiot for even engaging this argument with you last night. It is so obvious that you were being subtle in riling people up. Anyone with a half brain can see that. Denying proofs by saying nonsense and yet demanding for more proofs just makes you look unreasonable and pathetic. Is your intention to help NT2 understand more about buddhism? Are you being helpful or more of a hindrance here? Are you even a buddhist in the first place? In fact even AEN didn't know what those monks were doing at that place.Originally posted by laurence82:Not wrong. He did post even the same title, AEN was everywhere explaining, even in the topic he posted a Guan Yin picture. Which part of the post say he was a cunning liar? He is, but not within this post of mine. Extra judicial comments..tsk tsk...
Again, you are doing the same thing, I asked for possibly the third time. How would providing an analogy be trolling? You said it is, so it is? So pray, do tell where i coming from? Say! How is providing an analogy be trolling? Why you are making guesses about where i am coming from without proving it?
Still no proof, dont xia shou wei qiang bu saying i would say there is no proof, because your 'proof' doesnt exist...so how to ignore..
You conveniently ignore my post, whereby a) a Christian would think Buddhism is wrong anyway, so it doesnt matter...b) you even admitted to the point its bo liao, its within the last page, yet now you are going one circle by saying this part?
"Totally irrelevant, because someone who isn't buddhist isn't gonna automatically know which one is right and which is wrong, and they certainly won't memorize your religion. Posting negative comments like the bolded line isn't gonna make people very happy, especially people who are sincerely expecting answers. "
Phrasing of answers doesnt matter. Truth is truth. It hurts. to some maybe. Again, no proof this is a trolling statement.
Strange. You know subtlety or not? I think you are just being selective. In any case, if you feel this argument is dumb, why are you continuing even now? You cant prove, and in this case, bring out the quotes and explain how they are troll, yet you talk about me being subtle and all that? Tsk...you are losing touch. You are putting these labels, because you want it to be, not because you have good reasons to do so.Originally posted by Cenarious:Now I feel like an idiot for even engaging this argument with you last night. It is so obvious that you were being subtle in riling people up. Anyone with a half brain can see that. Denying proofs by saying nonsense and yet demanding for more proofs just makes you look unreasonable and pathetic. Is your intention to help NT2 understand more about buddhism? Are you being helpful or more of a hindrance here? Are you even a buddhist in the first place? In fact even AEN didn't know what those monks were doing at that place.
If you are a buddhist, start learning to live in the present.
If you are not, why are you here speculating about other people's agenda when you don't even know your stuff?
And one more thing... "i understand where you are coming from" means I understand what you mean. Please read more serious discussions on other websites' forums instead of posting more crap on sgforums and turning other people's threads into crapboxes before making a fool of yourself again.
Ok, now we have a change of discussion style. Post one question at a time and I will elaborate on it. We will not move to another question of yours until you are convinced.Originally posted by laurence82:Strange. You know subtlety or not? I think you are just being selective. In any case, if you feel this argument is dumb, why are you continuing even now? You cant prove, and in this case, bring out the quotes and explain how they are troll, yet you talk about me being subtle and all that? Tsk...you are losing touch. You are putting these labels, because you want it to be, not because you have good reasons to do so.
Again, are all these what you said relevant? Why does it matter if i know Buddhism or not? This is personal assasination, pls stick to the issue at hand.
Lastly, you understand what i mean? Seems like the whole time you are just putting labels, take up one sentence, call them trolling, take up another, said they are prejudiced without explaining why.
Again, for all these, i will reserve the right to call you troll, for you made these baseless allegations without proper proof.![]()
EasyOriginally posted by Cenarious:Ok, now we have a change of discussion style. Post one question at a time and I will elaborate on it. We will not move to another question of yours until you are convinced.
No, because you are thriving in chaos. Any attempt to answer your questions you cover over with chaos and nonsense. Now we will look at each question in detail. Go on, post one that is sensible.Originally posted by laurence82:Easy
Go back to all my questions from whatever page you flamed me and answer them
You think I am so stupid to dig up what you ignore/unable to prove for many pages?![]()
Pls prove which attempt to answer my question will result in chaos and nonsenseOriginally posted by Cenarious:No, because you are thriving in chaos. Any attempt to answer your questions you cover over with chaos and nonsense. Now we will look at each question in detail. Go on, post one that is sensible.