Originally posted by Isis:Insights help tremendously but we can start by practising
Eh what u meant isn't easy for a deluded sentient being like me ha ha.
I think... one has to realise non-self, impermance and emptiness in order to reach there kind of mental/emotional natural state.
Though there are different stages of realisation on there matter.... which i think another highly-cultivated forumer has said.Anatta, Impermanence are all related to Emptiness as well. Because of the nature of anatta and impermanence, all things are without inherent existence. If we cling to notions of 'self' and 'permanence', then we will grasp on the 5 skhandas and the world as having inherent existence, so we can't see its emptiness. The other aspect of Emptiness is about Dependent Origination, Conditioned Arising.. which can be considered even deeper realisations.
BTW may i know if u know what is the connection between emptiness and non-self? When one realises emptiness, will one see non-self? When one realise non-self, will one realise emptiness? okay, just asking.. though i think it is abit too chim...
Well said.. I agreeOriginally posted by AndrewPKYap:I don't think I can agree with that...
If you see two people behaving the same way over and over again, one of them *can be having a habit* and the other not!
"habit" means you do it *without thought* and you are *compelled*
To be *empty* is to be free. You might see a free person behaving (or doing) some things repeatedly in a certain way but that *can be* *is not* considered to be *out of habit* because he is free to do it any other way.
If he is doing it in an *unmindful* *unaware* manner *out of habit* that is not wise.
===============
lol... I always thought I cant really stand studying for too long... but during O level period, I can mug whole day whole night for about 2 months.. no TV, no computer, no anything (but got music la)Originally posted by Isis:ehh i think i mia from here till exam...
im most active during exam period.. i realised -_-
no wonder don't do so well lah
Originally posted by Isis:It depends on what you meant by “fighting sleepiness”, if genuine conditions for sleep arise, you should sleep. However if you are referring “sleepiness” as a result of unstable and distracted mind then it is one of the five hindrance (sensual desire, ill-will, sloth and torpor, restlessness and worry, doubt.) that should be overcome with right effort of meditation. These hindrances denied us from experiencing the joy of raptures and tranquility.
What if u need to hold on such as " to fight sleeplyness".. it couldn't be bad?
This is a very difficult question although it may sound simple. At the face value, attachment is an emotional cling to an object. It is the cause of repeated miseries and in Buddhism it is what that turns the wheel of rebirth. We are attached because of ignorance. We may take ignorance as the inability to see thing as it is, that is, we fail to ‘see’ deep enough the 3 universal characteristics of phenomenal existence.
Where does attachment arises? It is from ignorance -> where the notion of this "self" arises?
Hmm let me paste a part from 'Mastering the Core Teachings of the Buddha' (http://www.interactivebuddha.com/mctb.html)...Originally posted by Thusness:As a matter of fact, training ourselves to be ‘bare’ in attention in insight meditation is to understand the essence of the seals and our pristine nature. We may wonder why must we be ‘bare’ in attention? Why must one go beyond symbols and why did Padmasambhava teach Self Liberation through ‘seeing’ with 'naked' awareness?
...How do I know that solely content-based practice won’t produce insight? Because there are only Three Doors to ultimate reality, that’s why, and they are utterly unrelated to content, though they can be found in all content if the content aspect is ignored. (Actually, there is sort of a fourth door that is accessible to very realized beings, see the Appendix.) “Only Three Doors? But there are thousands of practices, many traditions! How can you say there are only Three Doors?”
There are only Three Doors, thatÂ’s how. I donÂ’t care what tradition you subscribe to, what practice you do, or who you are, there are only three basic ways to enter into the attainment of ultimate reality, emptiness, Nirvana, or whatever you want to call it. These doors relate directly to profound and direct understandings of the Three Characteristics of impermanence, suffering and no-self, and you have to understand the heck out of these to enter into the ranks of the Noble Ones.
“But there are many valid traditions that do not talk about the Three Characteristics!” It may appear so, but if the tradition is a valid tradition you will find these teachings in there somehow, in some other language or formulation, as these are the only way. You will find them in the works of Rumi, Kabir and Krishnamurti. You will find them in the Bible and Koran. You will find them in the writings of St. John of the Cross and many other Christian mystics. You will find them in all of the branches of Buddhism. You will find them in the Upanishads. You will find them in the writings of Carlos Castaneda. You will find them wherever you find a true spiritual path, and that is just all there is to it. It can help to consider that to completely understand compassion is to understand suffering and vice versa, as these are really two sides of the same coin. Also, to understand True Self practices is the same as understanding no-self practices, as these are also two sides of the same coin.
“But we are tantric practitioners, and the Three Characteristics are merely a low-brow Hinayana teaching.” Tantra primarily cultivates the emptiness door, that of no-self, which is one of the Three Characteristics. It can also be useful for transmuting energy into more skillful forms, a bit of which will be discussed later. However, those who consider themselves to be mahayanists or vajrayanaists should read the fine print. You will find that all Three Characteristics are there, and in fact that you are highly encouraged to master the “Hinayana” practices before moving on to the Mahayana or Vajrayana practices anyway. I strongly suggest checking out Lama Yeshe’s Introduction to Tantra. Further, the Hinayana is often confused with the Theravada, and while there are similarities, the Theravada is much more extensive than the Tibetan division of the Hinayana and contains extensive teachings on compassion and emptiness as well as helping others, but this is a topic for another time.
In short, should you enter ultimate reality or emptiness, it will be through one of the Three Doors. This is just the way it is. It is not negotiable. The nature of the mind and reality are just the nature of the mind and reality. You cannot change this, but you can understand it.
“But we are Zen students. We realize Buddha Nature! We don’t need the Three Characteristics, as we sit zazen!” Read any good book on Zen, such as those by Dogen, Chi-nul, or the excellent Zen Mind, Beginner’s Mind, by Shunryu Suzuki. The Three Characteristics are in there in abundance, and those who think they can enter ultimate reality in some other way are fooling themselves. Paying direct attention to bare reality with clarity and precision will result in directly observing the Three Characteristics regardless of whether or not you wish to call them that, as they are absolutely the truth of all conditioned things in all times and in all beings.
Thus, the practice, tradition, and all of that, i.e. content, are irrelevant in the end. However, you need them right up until the last moment, so donÂ’t think that I am advocating not following a tradition. I am just advocating actually following the tradition correctly and thus clearly penetrating into the nature of your actual experience just as it is. Nothing helps in the end but understanding the fundamental nature of reality, i.e. the Three Characteristics....
~ Dharma Dan
Originally posted by An Eternal Now:
Regarding mental suffering caused by 'myself'... At first hand it seems like its the OTHER party that is causing MY mental suffering... but when we look deeper we realise that this is due to our fundamental dualistic assumption, that there is a self and other... and the self gets hurt by the other. This dualistic, egoic assumption is what we call our basic ignorance...[/quote]
Cycle just quoted this in the Daily Buddhist Verses thread:
[quote]Originally posted by cycle:The fundamental delusion of humanity is to suppose that I am here and you are out there.
~Yasutani Roshi
Of course all of us have attachments... but nevertheless we should learn how to let go of our attachment.. as well as to cultivate a non-attached mind.Originally posted by justdoit77:hi isis
Having attachment is not necessary bad things, its all depends on whether the attachment lead you upward or downward.
Like when you are climbing up a ladder, when you are at the level of being stingy, someone tell you to do donations will give you good merits, so you let go of this level of stingy and move up to the next higher level of conditional giving.
At our level is impossible to have no attachment, most important thing is how to use an attachment to eliminate another attachment.
Heard of this chinese saying "Cure illness with poison"? IMO, there is no permanent poison or antidote, use it correctly to the right person and other right mixture of conditions it will become antidote, else it will become poison.
just wonder is there different state of heightened awareness or just pure awareness?Originally posted by Isis:Regarding Andrewyap post on habits.
im mindful that i should not be here posting but im still feel compelled to after reading his posting
then what it is ??
if habit is easy to break.............................................
Originally posted by Isis:You can call it heightened awareness because you become more aware when you're mindful, but it's more like 'relaxed awareness'... because your mind and 'sense of self' can rest without giving rise to incessant, unnecessary thoughts while reflecting everything that is arising in consciousness clearly in a detached manner. If you know you're attached but continue to be attached that isn't true mindfulness.
just wonder is there different state of heightened awareness or just pure awareness?
May i know why im so blur sometime and not fully-awared of everythings around me and yet can be fully-awared of the things that i'm concentrating on ?
Btw being mindful isn't enough to break the habits. You need concentration/discipline to break it. i think.........[/b]Concentration is important as well.. & my teacher taught there are several stages of 'ding4' that practitioners shld progressively attain. However concentration is a different thing as I mentioned earlier... it is about one-pointedness of the mind but may not come with mindfulness/awareness. Mindfulness reflects things as they are without reacting/attaching to things. However there needs to be a balance. Please read this chapter from 'Mindfulness in Plain English'.. btw the author Ven. Henepola Gunaratana is also a v accomplished practitioner (an anagami/arhat)... and the bk is a gd guide esp for beginners on meditation. The book: http://www.budsas.org/ebud/mfneng/mind0.htm
Originally posted by Isis:I see
mmmm i think i'm able to concentrate very well ( shut off distraction easily)
if i must definitely work on mindfulness... always shut myself in lecture
thx for the article..
u r like a buddhist google tool bar![]()
Originally posted by Isis:You have the habit of shutting off in sch and study? Means you are dwelling on other thoughts, or are you thoughtless but 'shut off'?
BTW i think my friend knows i live my life quite unmindfully. She adi told me to practise mindful living. I think my habit of shutting my mental mode in sch and study isn't good... in blur state of what i'm doing. : (
May i ask... if "self/ego" has been a strong imprint in one's mind due to previous pastlife karma. It will affected the practise of being mindfulness?It won't affect but for anyone it will take time to cultivate. It's not something that comes in weeks.
My dharma teacher told me in my past life my practise has deviated, more towards attaining an oblivious state of absorption (kong1 ding4). However such absorption does not come with clarity/awareness. As such I may sometimes 'space out'. Then my mom ask in that case am I often without thoughts? She said no... thoughts may have already creeped in unknowingly (its true). It might be possible that in your past life certain habits continued into the present life.Originally posted by Isis:Ehhh thoughtless [space out ? ] and sometime dwelling onto some distant feelings..
When people talk to me, the mind just stay there.. thoughtless.. that y sometime, i very slow in reacting towards conversation! erm...Originally posted by An Eternal Now:My dharma teacher told me in my past life my practise has deviated, more towards attaining an oblivious state of absorption (kong1 ding4). However such absorption does not come with clarity/awareness. As such I may sometimes 'space out'. Then my mom ask in that case am I often without thoughts? She said no... thoughts may have already creeped in unknowingly (its true). It might be possible that in your past life certain habits continued into the present life.
You mentioned you have attention deficit disorder. My school teacher last time did recommend me to visit some psychiatrist b4 in regards to this. I didn't visit lah.. bcos it wasn't that serious.. I think dharma practise can help. My dharma teacher told me I should cultivate mindful awareness everywhere incl. in school, attending lessons, etc.
As the article above said:Originally posted by Isis:When people talk to me, the mind just stay there.. thoughtless.. that y sometime, i very slow in reacting towards conversation! erm...
hw do u practise mindful awareness?
Most of our behaviour are on-auto-pilot. If i deliberately trying being mindful.. it is not easy.. sometime don't feel natural.
There is nothing inherently wrong with thoughtlessness... in fact in Buddhist meditation we free our minds from incessant thoughts however mindfulness is still there, not a form of absorption or spacing out. Most of the time when we think we are thoughtless actually there are still thoughts going on but we may not be exactly aware. Whether you are spacing out or distracted, the thing is you have lost your mindfulness and clarity... as such you become 'blur' and dunno what is happening.Originally posted by Isis:okie.. suddenly things seems clearer than before...
i will definitely read the article when im free.
i think i can try to apply on my mugging now.. c how it works.
Btw the thoughtless state of mind creates mental confusion for me sometime as in the way i deal with external and internalise processing of info.Do u experience that too ? Perhaps i need to see a doc abt it
Thx u for the link again.
May all be well and happy.
/\
First, we have to understand what is attachment.Originally posted by An Eternal Now:Of course all of us have attachments... but nevertheless we should learn how to let go of our attachment.. as well as to cultivate a non-attached mind.
I think there is no such thing as 'good attachment'... attachment is not a matter of good and bad... and like the sutras and hui neng said.. 'shan er jie fan nao', good and bad both results in sufferings. It means whether your attachment is attached to good, or attached to bad, they are still suffering. Anyway a Buddhist shld avoid doing good deeds for the merits... otherwise there will be no merits (like wat bodhidharma told the emperor), only 'you lou fu', or 'leaking blessings'.. these are not merits, which arises from the dharmakaya, from liberation.
In Buddhism we have to eventually relinquish all these attachments... in order to awaken to our true nature.
There are methods to use poison to cure illness... but eventually even poison, and everything, also is relinquished.
Originally posted by justdoit77:Desire to watch movie, eat meat, become rich and reborn in heaven are all attachments that must be relinquished slowly... and they all causes sufferings. Desire for enlightenment is the last desire and of course will eventually go, too, when we reach enlightenment... like a raft that is discarded when one reaches the shore. Even so a practitioner must be careful to make sure his practise is not a completely goal-oriented practise, but insight into his true nature must be developed moment to moment, or Now to Now.
[b]
First, we have to understand what is attachment.
Desire to watch movie, eat meat, become rich, reborn in heaven and even desire to become enlightened are all considered attachment.
While we cannot expect everyone to give up all these attachment all of a sudden, but we can do it gradually.
In the example given, if one is stingy and never have the intention to donate to the needy, then the concept of "donate and you will get good karma" will make him to progress although this thought is still an attachment.In a way this works, but I disagree that the intention of doing charity or virtuous deeds should be motivated by desires for personal benefit, which only results in 'leaking blessings'... but of course every Buddhist should eventually come to know about this. So although precepts clearly state the bad consequences of committing bad karma, or the 10 virtuous deeds and other wholesome karma are known to result in blessings, one must also practise not being attached to notions of self, receiver of karma, or attachment to personal benefits and so on...
But for one who is no longer stingy, the concept of "donate and you will get good karma" will be a poison to him, it will bring him downward.