Eh I think you type wrongly...Originally posted by bohiruci:After reading the story of Nan Huai Chin
I have no doubts to that Nan Huai Chin is not a realised practitioner
wow, this is such a truthful display of the mutli-disciplinary gurus we get nowadays, while we're at it, why not add a dash of Jina and another dose of Falun and dont forget a sprinkle of SaBaBa.Originally posted by bohiruci:After reading the story of Nan Huai Chin
I have no doubts to that Nan Huai Chin is not a realised practitioner
because He was recognised by the Gangkar Rinpoche of the Karma Kagyu Order
Gangkar Rinpoche was an Reincarnated Lineage Which was Personal Tutor to
Manchu Emperor and Blend Chinese Mahayana and Esoteric Kagyu School of China
So I can say His teachings is okie ,just that he often likes to make reference to taoist idea of "qi gong " and yin yang ,which is becos his audience usually
of taoist and confucianist scholar![]()
exactly my pointOriginally posted by An Eternal Now:Bohiruci typed wrongly, what he meant was he has no doubt he IS a realised practitioner...