Originally posted by mahawarrior:Hi, generally, any form of sexual activities outside your faithful partner is sexual misconduct. This includes casual sex, prositution, adultery, extra marital affairs and things like that. And yes of course that applies in modern society.
I think the other four of the Five Precept are relatively straight-forward.
But how did the [b]Buddha (not you) define 'sexual misconduct' exactly? And did his defination, which may have been applicable for the situation/society of that time (i.e. more conservative, different sets of socially accepted morals, etc), applicable in modern society?[/b]
Marriage is a social thing. Strictly speaking its not related to Buddhism. If you and her is faithful partner then its ok, as there are some people who decided to stay as faithful partners and did not get married.Originally posted by Hello Kitty:pardon me but i guess... he wans to knw abt pre-marital...?
my natural instinct pretty accurate de. either dat or one other ting. u ask him in priv loh.Originally posted by gigabyte14:dun tink so HK
i tink he's referring to all kinds
Originally posted by An Eternal Now:Hi, generally, any form of sexual activities outside your faithful partner is sexual misconduct. This includes casual sex, prositution, adultery, extra marital affairs and things like that. And yes of course that applies in modern society.
As I don't have much knowledge, I'm not sure if the Buddha mentioned pornography.Originally posted by choco B:What about viewing pornography while in an exclusive relationship?
Yes, this is sexual misconduct; regardless one is in an exclusive relationship or not. Strictly speaking, I remember reading Master Chi Zhou's ( forgot where's that book, will check it out) article that any craving for sexual gratifications is sexual misconduct. Even for married couples, if they make love in inappropriate places eg. kitchen, living room,garden, bathroom etc. instead of in the privacy of their bedroom, it is also sexual misconduct ( becos they are craving sexual excitment or gratifications).Originally posted by choco B:What about viewing pornography while in an exclusive relationship?
Thunder storm?? Got such thing meh? What is the name of the book and what temple you visited?Originally posted by 798:believe it or not, i once practise in temple at KL, i read this book, it stated dat,
having sex during thunder storm is consider as sexual misconduct too.
others including:
yeah. it listed 10 things which defined sexual misconduct. it also listed what is the correct ways to conduct sex.Originally posted by An Eternal Now:Thunder storm?? Got such thing meh? What is the name of the book and what temple you visited?
Strange.. never heard that.Originally posted by 798:yeah. it listed 10 things which defined sexual misconduct. it also listed what is the correct ways to conduct sex.
think the book is 'Refrain from Sexual Misconduct'. i'm not sure wat is the temple name since i went there in 1992.
but it can be closed ...Originally posted by Hello Kitty:the pandora's box has been opened...
Masturbation itself does not constitute a sexual misconduct for a lay person, though masturbation in the monastic order is not allowed and constitutes and offense which requires the monk to confess to the sangha (monastic community). But anyway the difference is because monks are supposed to uphold celibacy -- that means avoiding ALL sexual activities. For lay persons we do not need to uphold celibacy, but we have to follow the third precept of 'no sexual misconduct'.Originally posted by Scania N113CRB luver:Erm ... Is masturbation a sin ?
Originally posted by mahawarrior:So anyway, I just answered your question more detailed-ly in the post just above this.
I think the other four of the Five Precept are relatively straight-forward.
But how did the [b]Buddha (not you) define 'sexual misconduct' exactly? And did his defination, which may have been applicable for the situation/society of that time (i.e. more conservative, different sets of socially accepted morals, etc), applicable in modern society?[/b]
hey scania ,masturbation isnt a healthy stuffOriginally posted by Scania N113CRB luver:Erm ... Is masturbation a sin ?
Wrong partner -- I can understandOriginally posted by An Eternal Now:Masturbation itself does not constitute a sexual misconduct for a lay person, though masturbation in the monastic order is not allowed and constitutes and offense which requires the monk to confess to the sangha (monastic community). But anyway the difference is because monks are supposed to uphold celibacy -- that means avoiding ALL sexual activities. For lay persons we do not need to uphold celibacy, but we have to follow the third precept of 'no sexual misconduct'.
Which are,
Wrong partner-- a married person, a minor, someone in a relationship, an incompetent.
Wrong time -- day time
Wrong place -- in public, in shrine, etc.
Wrong orifice -- oral, anal.
Gender is not specified. These above can be found in the Abhidharmakosha. I do not think masturbation is mentioned.
But we must take note that it depends on your mind state. Masturbation is not only a physical act, it depends on your mental state as well, as it usually involves strong craving and sometimes lustful thoughts of sexual misconduct. This is creating a form of mental karma. Do know that karma has three forms: Mind karma, Speech karma, and Action karma. All these are volitional action (karma) and will have its karmic consequences in the future.
Negative unwholesome seeds and habit energy are planted into our 8th consciousness and may become a habit and might eventually become a monster in future or even future lifetimes as well.
An explanation of Loppon Namdrol in E-Sangha (http://www.lioncity.net/buddhism/index.php?showtopic=5439&hl=) states:Originally posted by mahawarrior:Wrong partner -- I can understand
Wrong time -- Why? What's wrong with having sex in day time as long as it's done in private and between consenting adults (the usual) ?
Wrong place -- I think I can understand.
Wrong orifice -- Same thing...why is this wrong? It doesn't seem to hurt anyone/anything to me.