Does the Buddha forsee the split?
-
Does the Buddha forsaw the split into Theravada and Mahayana and then later Vajirayana and many other Buddhist traditions? But first, did he predict the split into Theravada and Mahayana tradition first? For me I have this principle. As long as it is uttered by the Buddha, I follow, no differentiation for me between theravada and mahayana. If you want to attain salvation and liberate yourself, there is no fault in it. If you want to be a buddha and save all beings, I respect and admire you for your aspiration.
-
Mara king said to Buddha When you passed away, I and my followers will join your monkhood We will write our own sutras, we will replace you --------------------------------------------------------- You all judge for yourself How many really recognise only the buddha? Instead a lot of funny things pop up right? A lot of other weird stuff right? A lot of wrong dharma passed down right? Rituals that don't work at all right? Prayers that don't work at all right?
-
But Buddha did foresee the ending of the dharma.
-
Dharma can end? What has no beginning has NO END -------------------------------- Side track a bit... It's amazing to watch a relic give birth to another relic from nothing :D
-
Originally posted by maggot:
Dharma can end?
What has no beginning has NO END
Side track a bit…
It’s amazing to watch a relic give birth to another relic from nothing
Tell me when there are no humans to transmit the dharma, can it end? -
No humans? How can that be possible in the first place?
-
Originally posted by maggot:
No humans? How can that be possible in the first place?
just a question that came to mind, where were humans before the dinosaurs? -
Originally posted by maggot:
No humans? How can that be possible in the first place?
Why not? Dinosaurs came before humans. -
Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:
Tell me when there are no humans to transmit the dharma, can it end?If you're talking about dharma as the truth of phenomena then this truth never passes.
If you're talking about dharma as in the teachings and dissemination of that teachings, that will end.
-
Originally posted by An Eternal Now:
If you're talking about dharma as the truth of phenomena then this truth never passes.
If you're talking about dharma as in the teachings and dissemination of that teachings, that will end.
Who said the truth of phenomena never passes? If there is no one else concious of it, then it would pass. -
Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:
Who said the truth of phenomena never passes? If there is no one else concious of it, then it would pass.The truth is always there, just not noticed or realised.
-
Originally posted by An Eternal Now:
The truth is always there, just not noticed or realised.
Can a rock experience truth of phenomena? -
Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:
Can a rock experience truth of phenomena?Rock is not conscious.
-
Hmmm, so can that be explained into an anology , even though humans no longer exists, living things continue to live and die, and that is the truth? And by the way who is this Herzog Zwei? He seems to have some hostile agenda against buddhism?
-
Originally posted by *=Optimus=*:
Hmmm, so can that be explained into an anology , even though humans no longer exists, living things continue to live and die, and that is the truth? And by the way who is this Herzog Zwei? He seems to have some hostile agenda against buddhism?
Yes, the truth of impermanence, suffering, no-self, applies whether or not we notice or realise it. It is known as the 'dharma seal' or the 'seal of all phenomenon'. The truth of Emptiness, likewise.
Herzog Zwei is anti-religion.
-
Anti-religion? Buddhism is buddha's teachings not religion...
-
Buddhism is a teaching!