It is often I read about scandal news of religious leaders succumb to sexual temptation and unable to abstain from sexual misconduct. If a highly religious leader cannot resist sexual temptation, how about common people like us? Is this the most difficult precept to undertake?
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/12/world/asia/zen-buddhists-roiled-by-accusations-against-teacher.html?_r=0
Since arriving in Los Angeles from Japan in 1962, the Buddhist teacher Joshu Sasaki, who is 105 years old, has taught thousands of Americans at his two Zen centers in the area and one in New Mexico. He has influenced thousands more enlightenment seekers through a chain of some 30 affiliated Zen centers from the Puget Sound to Princeton to Berlin. And he is known as a Buddhist teacher of Leonard Cohen, the poet and songwriter.
Mr. Sasaki has also, according to an investigation by an independent council of Buddhist leaders, released in January, groped and sexually harassed female students for decades, taking advantage of their loyalty to a famously charismatic roshi, or master.
The allegations against Mr. Sasaki have upset and obsessed Zen Buddhists across the country, who are part of a close-knit world in which many participants seem to know, or at least know of, the principal teachers.
Mr. Sasaki did not respond to requests for interviews made through Paul Karsten, a member of the board of Rinzai-ji, his main center in Los Angeles. Mr. Karsten said that Mr. Sasaki’s senior priests are conducting their own inquiry. And he cautioned that the independent council took the accounts it heard from dozens of students at face value and did not investigate any “for veracity.”
Because Mr. Sasaki has founded or sponsored so many Zen centers, and because he has the prestige of having trained in Japan, the charges that he behaved unethically — and that his supporters looked the other way — have implications for an entire way of life.
Such charges have become more frequent in Zen Buddhism. Several other teachers have been accused of misconduct recently, notably Eido Shimano, who in 2010 was asked to resign from the Zen Studies Society in Manhattan over allegations that he had sex with students. Critics and victims have pointed to a Zen culture of secrecy, patriarchy and sexism, and to the quasi-religious worship of the Zen master, who can easily abuse his status.
Disaffected students wrote letters to the board of one of Mr. Sasaki’s Zen centers as early as 1991. Yet it was only last November, when Eshu Martin, a Zen priest who studied under Mr. Sasaki from 1997 to 2008, posted a letter to SweepingZen.com, a popular Web site, that the wider Zen world noticed.
Mr. Martin, now a Zen abbot in Victoria, British Columbia, accused Mr. Sasaki of a “career of misconduct,” from “frequent and repeated non-consensual groping of female students” to “sexually coercive after-hours ‘tea’ meetings, to affairs,” as well as interfering in his students’ marriages. Soon thereafter, the independent “witnessing council” of noted Zen teachers began interviewing 25 current or former students of Mr. Sasaki.
Some former students are now speaking out, including seven interviewed for this article, and their stories provide insight into the culture of Rinzai-ji and the other places where Mr. Sasaki taught. Women say they were encouraged to believe that being touched by Mr. Sasaki was part of their Zen training.
The Zen group, or sangha, can become one’s close family, and that aspect of Zen may account for why women and men have been reluctant to speak out for so long.
Many women whom Mr. Sasaki touched were resident monks at his centers. One woman who confronted Mr. Sasaki in the 1980s found herself an outcast afterward. The woman, who asked that her name not be used to protect her privacy, said that afterward “hardly anyone in the sangha, whom I had grown up with for 20 years, would have anything to do with us.”
In the council’s report on Jan. 11, the three members wrote of “Sasaki asking women to show him their breasts, as part of ‘answering’ a koan” — a Zen riddle — “or to demonstrate ‘non-attachment.’ ”
When the report was posted to SweepingZen, Mr. Sasaki’s senior priests wrote in a post that their group “has struggled with our teacher Joshu Sasaki Roshi’s sexual misconduct for a significant portion of his career in the United States” — their first such admission.
Among those who spoke to the council and for this article was Nikki Stubbs, who now lives in Vancouver, and who studied and worked at Mount Baldy, Mr. Sasaki’s Zen center 50 miles east of Los Angeles, from 2003 to 2006. During that time, she said, Mr. Sasaki would fondle her breasts during sanzen, or private meeting; he also asked her to massage his penis. She would wonder, she said, “Was this teaching?”
One monk, whom Ms. Stubbs said she told about the touching, was unsympathetic. “He believed in Roshi’s style, that sexualizing was teaching for particular women,” Ms. Stubbs said. The monk’s theory, common in Mr. Sasaki’s circle, was that such physicality could check a woman’s overly strong ego.
A former student of Mr. Sasaki’s now living in the San Francisco area, who asked that her name be withheld to protect her privacy, said that at Mount Baldy in the late 1990s, “the monks confronted Roshi and said, ‘This behavior is unacceptable and has to stop.’ ” However, she said, “nothing changed.” After a time, Mr. Sasaki used Zen teaching to justify touching her, too.
“He would say something like, ‘True love is giving yourself to everything,’ ” she explained. At Mount Baldy, the isolation could hamper one’s judgment. “It can sound trite, but you’re in this extreme state of consciousness,” she said — living at a monastery in the mountains, sitting in silence for many hours a day — “where boundaries fall away.”
Joe Marinello is a Zen teacher in Seattle who served on the board of the Zen Studies Society in New York. He has been openly critical of Mr. Shimano, the former abbot who was asked to resign from the society. Asked about teachers who say that sexual touch is an appropriate teaching technique, he was dismissive.
“In my opinion,” Mr. Marinello said in an e-mail, “it’s just their cultural and personal distortion to justify their predations.”
But in Zen Buddhism, students often overlook their teachers’ failings, participants say. Some Buddhists define their philosophy in contrast to Western religion: Buddhism, they believe, does not have Christian-style preoccupations about things like sex. And Zen exalts the relationship between a student and a teacher, who can come to seem irreplaceable.
“Outside the sexual things that happened,” the woman now in San Francisco said, “my relationship with him was one of the most important I have had with anyone.”
Several women said that Zen can foster an atmosphere of overt sexism. Jessica Kramer, a doula in Los Angeles, was Mr. Sasaki’s personal attendant in 2002. She said that he would reach into her robe and that she always resisted his advances. Surrounded almost entirely by men, she said she got very little sympathy. “I’d talk about it with people who’d say, ‘Why not just let him touch your breasts if he wants to touch your breasts?’ ”
Susanna Stewart began studying with Mr. Sasaki about 40 years ago. Within six months, she said, Mr. Sasaki began to touch her during sanzen. This sexualizing of their relationship “led to years of confusion and pain,” Ms. Stewart said, “eventually resulting in my becoming unable to practice Zen.” And when she married one of his priests, Mr. Sasaki tried to break them up, she said, even encouraging her husband to have an affair.
In 1992, Ms. Stewart’s husband disaffiliated himself and his North Carolina Zen Center from Mr. Sasaki. Years later, his wife said, he received hate mail from members of his old Zen group.
The witnessing council, which wrote the report, has no official authority. Its members belong to the American Zen Teachers Association but collected stories on their own initiative, although with a statement of support from 45 other teachers and priests. One of its authors, Grace Schireson, said that Zen Buddhists in the United States have misinterpreted a Japanese philosophy.
“Because of their long history with Zen practice, people in Japan have some skepticism about priests,” Ms. Schireson said. But in the United States many proponents have a “devotion to the guru or the teacher in a way that could repress our common sense and emotional intelligence.”
Last Thursday morning, at Rinzai-ji on Cimarron Street in Los Angeles, Bob Mammoser, a resident monk, said that Mr. Sasaki’s “health is quite frail” and that he has “basically withdrawn from any active teaching.” Mr. Mammoser said there is talk of a meeting at the center to discuss what, if any, action to take.
Mr. Mammoser said he first became aware of allegations against Mr. Sasaki in the 1980s. “There have been efforts in the past to address this with him,” Mr. Mammoser said. “Basically, they haven’t been able to go anywhere.”
He added: “What’s important and is overlooked is that, besides this aspect, Roshi was a commanding and inspiring figure using Buddhist practice to help thousands find more peace, clarity and happiness in their own lives. It seems to be the kind of thing that, you get the person as a whole, good and bad, just like you marry somebody and you get their strengths and wonderful qualities as well as their weaknesses.”
Sex literally keeps the world going after all. I remember reading from somewhere this practioner/monk advising against taking celibacy vows unless you're absolutely sure you're able to control and reduce your urges. Especially for positions of power and the whole "your teacher is always right" environment like what we have here, it's just a recipe for disaster.
It is quite natural to label the precepts in its order of difficulties based on how each of us would perceive the degree of difficulties of purifying each of these virtues.
The path of purification of these virtues simultaneously in conjunction with the purification of the mind through concentration and the perfection of wisdom are intricately linked to each other in a continuous cycle. The process of letting go of our ‘desires’ and ‘wants’ would diminish progressively as we continue with our cultivation towards the perfection of these paths. The practices and the application of these precepts in our daily lives would naturally become ‘purer’ as we progresses until one has perfected one's Wisdom which would also mean sila have being perfected.
Maybe all these highly regarded and intelligent religious leaders who succumb to all these temptations may still have some way to go in their Buddhists cultivation and practices.
Hello happy new year...!
A bit confused which you are trying to say: the difficulty of observing precepts or the sexual misconduct of buddhist teachers?
There are too many instances of misbehaviours to list down. What i think we should rely on buddhadharma but not the teachers.
As for precepts, i strongly encourage you to accept and observe. Everytime when u are about to do something wrong, the precepts will pop into your mind and remind u.
Well, happy new year,
According the Buddha, we live in the desire realm and hence, such occurance is not unusual. It is just amazing that he has managed to maintain his libido at his age! He's very attached and doesn't seem to have internalized the Zen teachings. However, for such an exteemed member to the Zen community, it must be disheartening to many and it can lead many to lose faith in the teachings. When such an esteemed member commit sexual misconduct, it leads to many people losing faith in the Dharma. Anyway, why look at one master who feel from grace when there are so many other great masters and practitioners that are exemplary in this practice and conduct?
Why look at the black sheeps? There are so many monks and lay Buddhists who can observe the precepts, why look at those few who can't? The fact that there are so many monks and lay Buddhists who can observe the precepts just got to show that it is not difficult to observe.
Guanyin Pusa's sutra states that anyone with high sexual desire, should recite her name. One of my friend told me that it is very effective.
If a highly religious leader cannot resist sexual temptation, how about common people like us? Is this the most difficult precept to undertake?
I can understand somewhat your reasoning behind the questions. I would sometimes ask myself questions like these when I hear or read about reports of misconduct by religious leaders.
However, the most important issue is to remind oneself, what are the original core values of that particular religion that the leader is practising? The fact is, humans are not infallible, even for those who we perceive as highly religious.
Comparison is not necessarily bad, unless your mindset is mainly to give yourself an excuse not to do your best in restraining from doing what you clearly know to be wrong.
The question should not be whether any particular precept is the most difficult to undertake. We should ask ourselves to consider first, whether one already has the right understanding about the kind of undesirable outcomes that would come true for us if we are not putting in the right effort to observe any precept.
Assuming you get the answer that refraining from sexual misconduct is the most difficult precept to undertake, would choosing not to undertake the precept make you any better in resisting sexual temptation now and in the future? Or would you rather tell yourself, even if every religious leader I know fails in observing any precept perfectly at any point in time, I would still continue to make whatever effort I can to undertake that precept because I understand what would happen if I choose not to.