Ok... I've finished scanning through his work and checked every single sentence he wrote with Google Advanced Search. Very tiring and painstaking work.
At least 10% of the sentences he wrote have either been plagiarised wholesale or modified only slightly. I can accept that perhaps some of them were pure coincidences.
But then again, sentences supposedly written by him like this one have appeared in online research articles word-for-word:
'
Nuclear power generation is an internationally controversial issue but most experts and the public in China believe that nuclear power is safe and clean, so the Chinese government will continue to actively develop nuclear energy. '
I refuse to believe that the
exact same sentence can coincidentally be thought up by two different people a few thousand kilometers apart. The article in question was written in the University of Alberta... that's in Canada.
Bugger it. He's dead meat.

He's totally ruined my night.... I'm going jogging to cool off.
