Club 30's "Kill The Boredom Demon" Jive Pad, 53rd Edition
-
both fridays are freeOriginally posted by Ferret:k k
this friday or next fri free mahz ?
I wanna go tung lok. need to round up a few ppl.
-wields an imaginary lasso-
-
What did I miss?
-
Sure it is up to them to think what they like.Originally posted by hisoka:oh well have fun with him. i'm thinking your attitude with him and the baiting might be offensive to some to.
So be it. They have every right to, like the right I have to think that he is a self-righteous prick with a 'holier than thou' attitude.
Plus, I don't go around goading him on
I just presented facts to him and he does most of the work himself after that -
we were just making fun of your good friend bokaOriginally posted by Keii:What did I miss? -
food.Originally posted by Keii:What did I miss?
this fri or next fri. free mahz. -
did u noe he think the role of a wife is to manufacture baby?! and tat he wanna a young fertile gal to recreate his excellent genes....Originally posted by av98m:I think badzmaro is also a borderline fruitcake 
-
you are the one complicating things with variance and what not, not meOriginally posted by elindra:Yes you are complicating things
And going by your defination, anyone without hubris are those people who have no self-confidence or esteem and are basically wasting away.
i won't know about the wasting away. and i'm saying they can be regarded as such. not that they are. because hubris is a term thats relative and subjective. -
what the.............Originally posted by tare:did u noe he think the role of a wife is to manufacture baby?! and tat he wanna a young fertile gal to recreate his excellent genes.... 
-
By having relative and subjective you already added a variance to itOriginally posted by hisoka:you are the one complicating things with variance and what not, not me
i won't know about the wasting away. and i'm saying they can be regarded as such. not that they are. because hubris is a term thats relative and subjective.
And you made it complicated by having a zero defect to it saying that even with a hint of pride, one is committing hubris -
you could think what you like too. i guess.Originally posted by elindra:Sure it is up to them to think what they like.
So be it. They have every right to, like the right I have to think that he is a self-righteous prick with a 'holier than thou' attitude.
Plus, I don't go around goading him on
I just presented facts to him and he does most of the work himself after that
but i would say hes a worthy target. but i'm too lazy to do it mayself -
i would take what he says with some salt. i don't think hes being serious 3/4 of the time.Originally posted by tare:did u noe he think the role of a wife is to manufacture baby?! and tat he wanna a young fertile gal to recreate his excellent genes.... -
nope ralative and subjective does not add a variance to it. by subscribing to it you are adding complications.Originally posted by elindra:By having relative and subjective you already added a variance to it
And you made it complicated by having a zero defect to it saying that even with a hint of pride, one is committing hubris
what so complicated about that? it was always in the definitions. just whether you want to take it as such. -
He is serious 4/4 of the time and gets incredibly upset if you say otherwiseOriginally posted by hisoka:i would take what he says with some salt. i don't think hes being serious 3/4 of the time. -
i agree..Originally posted by hisoka:i would take what he says with some salt. i don't think hes being serious 3/4 of the time.
i don't think he was being serious..
just kidding.. -
badmaro? is it? didn't realise. i would have thought not. oh well, does the rest think so too?Originally posted by elindra:He is serious 4/4 of the time and gets incredibly upset if you say otherwise -
Yes it does because it becomes a measurementOriginally posted by hisoka:nope ralative and subjective does not add a variance to it. by subscribing to it you are adding complications.
what so complicated about that? it was always in the definitions. just whether you want to take it as such.
What is your tolorance level before pride becomes hubris.
By saying that because you don't know what is the tolorance lvl, there comes in the variance if you wanna put numbers to it. And you are going by the zero tolorance coz anything above your imaginery point, it becomes hubris to you.
And it is not taking it as such or not but you are effectively lumping 2 different things together and calling it one.
If there is no difference, there wouldn't be different words to describe them in the first place. -
Looks like I missed out alot.
And that dimwit boka's not my good friend.
-
Can't seem to sleep.
I'm tired, but I'm also a feeling a bit too jumpy right now.
I think I'll just have an early dinner and then get started on my notes.
-
Talking about my fav toy boka laOriginally posted by hisoka:badmaro? is it? didn't realise. i would have thought not. oh well, does the rest think so too? -
nope, he's just kidding.Originally posted by hisoka:badmaro? is it? didn't realise. i would have thought not. oh well, does the rest think so too?
anyway he said those stuff abt "superior genes" only to annoy me -
My boss emailed me. and I unthinkingly replied "Ok. Noted" >.<"!
too much sgf -
if you are saying a measurement always begets a variance. which is true to some extent i guess. then the variance exists in the beginning anyway, the existent of hubris indicates a measurement. and i don't see you bringing it up earlier.Originally posted by elindra:Yes it does because it becomes a measurement
What is your tolorance level before pride becomes hubris.
By saying that because you don't know what is the tolorance lvl, there comes in the variance if you wanna put numbers to it. And you are going by the zero tolorance coz anything above your imaginery point, it becomes hubris to you.
And it is not taking it as such or not but you are effectively lumping 2 different things together and calling it one.
If there is no difference, there wouldn't be different words to describe them in the first place.
you could bring in a tolerance levels if you want. but thats only if you can quantify it. otherwise talking about a tolerance level is just a waste of time. again i say i am doing no measurement in the engineering or statistical sense of the word. If you really wanted to talk about tolerance levels then i guess you need to bring it in with any statement about somethign you make; and thats pretty unwieldy and normally not done. complications? -
we talking about maro then you suddenly quote me and talk about boka without putting in name..................Originally posted by elindra:Talking about my fav toy boka la -
Originally posted by Ferret:My boss emailed me. and I unthinkingly replied "Ok. Noted" >.<"!
too much sgf -
die lah.Originally posted by av98m:
must surf other webbies riaos