Club 30's "Kill The Boredom Demon" Jive Pad, 62nd Edition
-
you mean the sweet smell? well it certainly smelt the same as the weed smoke.Originally posted by Fatum:they actually stinks of burning papaya leaves or rope .... I know, cos a bunch of my friends were just smoking them outside my place ....
I condescended with a tobacco cigarette instead .... never touched weed in my life ...
and the hoonie is a diff smell. very pungent. -
i was reading the courts journals for i think year 2001 (dont ask why i was reading it), and at that time Chee Soon Juan was sued by Holy Goh and Lau Lee for defamation..againOriginally posted by fudgester:If it's written under duress, then I should think that it's considered unlawful.
and CSJ was saying he signed those documents of confession under duress...and the judge was like saying that it is not illegal or is he under duress..coz Goh and Lee have the legal rights to do so....legal rights in the sense they can sue him if he did not, and its not duress coz they never threatened to harm him bodily or anything -
This can afford a few more posts in here
-
WTF......Originally posted by laurence82:and CSJ was saying he signed those documents of confession under duress...and the judge was like saying that it is not illegal or is he under duress..coz Goh and Lee have the legal rights to do so....legal rights in the sense they can sue him if he did not, and its not duress coz they never threatened to harm him bodily or anything
So theoretically, as long as I don't threaten to bash some fella up, I can coerce him to sign a confession that he did something wrong when he actually didn't?!?! -
verbal agreements is hard to prove... it's kinda like ur words against mine...Originally posted by hisoka:i meant i thought verbal agreements are binding. dunno i remember i read it somewhere de. maybe not singapore also possible
tat's why there must always be witnesses and black&white... -
For issues with girls, normally is the guy at the losing end
What's with CSJ now? -
Yeah verbal agreements are hard to prove
You need black and white
Though there are cases where a set of events can prove that the verbal agreement was said but then again it depends on the lawyer to argue -
i didn't say "yes"
-
duress ? .... last I checked, defamation suits are civil, not criminal ... so did he mean that the matah took him to a lock up, tied a phone book against his chest and whacked him ? ....Originally posted by laurence82:i was reading the courts journals for i think year 2001 (dont ask why i was reading it), and at that time Chee Soon Juan was sued by Holy Goh and Lau Lee for defamation..again
and CSJ was saying he signed those documents of confession under duress...and the judge was like saying that it is not illegal or is he under duress..coz Goh and Lee have the legal rights to do so....legal rights in the sense they can sue him if he did not, and its not duress coz they never threatened to harm him bodily or anything -
err, the pt is not whether he did or notOriginally posted by fudgester:WTF......
So theoretically, as long as I don't threaten to bash some fella up, I can coerce him to sign a confession that he did something wrong when he actually didn't?!?!
but rather, threatening to sue someone is not classified under 'duress' -
just wonderingOriginally posted by kopiosatu:i didn't say "yes"
what if one day she said she really doesn't need the commitment
and perfectly happy with a no strings attached relationship
would completely accept any consequences -
u heng har!!!!!!Originally posted by kopiosatu:i didn't say "yes" -
huh?Originally posted by Fatum:duress ? .... last I checked, defamation suits are civil, not criminal ... so did he mean that the matah took him to a lock up, tied a phone book against his chest and whacked him ? .... -
u watched too much HK dramas!Originally posted by Fatum:duress ? .... last I checked, defamation suits are civil, not criminal ... so did he mean that the matah took him to a lock up, tied a phone book against his chest and whacked him ? .... -
rubbish ... I think all women are biologically wired to want commitments ....Originally posted by ShrodingersCat:just wondering
what if one day she said she really doesn't need the commitment
and perfectly happy with a no strings attached relationship
would completely accept any consequences
it dates back from the days when the Mr neanderthal would bonk and run ... leaving Miss neanderthal with BB ....
I'd be very suspicious of women who doesn't want commitments .... I always ran away from ONS who wanted to do it again sometime ..... -
Oh ok.... paiseh....Originally posted by laurence82:err, the pt is not whether he did or not
but rather, threatening to sue someone is not classified under 'duress'
'Bloody hell.... sign this confession letter or I'll sue the pants off you!!!!'
I sure would be under duress if I was in such a position. -
then kopi would have achieved every guy's dream.Originally posted by ShrodingersCat:just wondering
what if one day she said she really doesn't need the commitment
and perfectly happy with a no strings attached relationship
would completely accept any consequences
which is having a hot f uck buddy with no strings attached
sort of, you know, friends with special privileges -
I do meet into cases where the girls can threaten guys for unreasonable reasons
-
when i was reading that stuff, at the back of my head....i was thinking...did the judge make such ruling because of who the plaintiff are...?Originally posted by fudgester:Oh ok.... paiseh....
'Bloody hell.... sign this confession letter or I'll sue the pants off you!!!!'
I sure would be under duress if I was in such a position.
-
eh...more like you only wanted to fuck every woman once right?Originally posted by Fatum:I'd be very suspicious of women who doesn't want commitments .... I always ran away from ONS who wanted to do it again sometime ..... -
but some women may think that trading in commitments to gain a temporary relationship could be an investment for a longer lasting one.Originally posted by Fatum:rubbish ... I think all women are biologically wired to want commitments ....
it dates back from the days when the Mr neanderthal would bonk and run ... leaving Miss neanderthal with BB ....
I'd be very suspicious of women who doesn't want commitments .... I always ran away from ONS who wanted to do it again sometime .....
However, not all men think like you. some men feel that the offer for a no commitment rship means they can do whatever they want, absolved from all responsibility.
Which is essentially true. -
Unfortunately, justice is not entirely blind.Originally posted by laurence82:when i was reading that stuff, at the back of my head....i was thinking...did the judge make such ruling because of who the plaintiff are...? -
But for CSJ... The vocal part can be proven
What he said back then @ Jurong was shown on TVnews somemore -
no .... but I've had bad experiences ..... there are rules to the game, and if a woman isn't willing to play by the rules, then perhaps she shouldn't be playing at all ....Originally posted by av98m:eh...more like you only wanted to fuck every woman once right?
I've had situations where I found myself in "couplehood" the morning after .... it's... frightening ....
that's why I never ever ever do anything to wifey candidates .... -
how thrilling is that?Originally posted by av98m:eh...more like you only wanted to fuck every woman once right?
fat tummy, do it again!