God does not force you to marry into Islam. He gives you the power of reasoning and freewill. If it is fated for the guy to marry the Muslim girl, the guy will one day 'realize' and he will use his gift of freewill to do right. I speak from experience .
Just a question, if an other religion (die die do not believe in muslim) guy and a gal loves each other a lot and die die need to marry, wat r the option available to them ? From the viewpoints I came out with the following possible option
1, Don't marry
2, Guy convert (even though he die die do not believe in muslim)
3, Girl convert but will result in a serious backlash
the fourth option, guys stay as his religion and girl stay as her is not really avaliable if u r under strict muslim laws.
I heard from some rumours tat if a muslim decide to renounce her faith, her family had to disown her as a daughter... is tat true ?
The medical science finds that there is a risk for various diseaseas
the pig is found to be a host for many parasites and potential diseases.
I have talked about tis in speakers corner before. If muslim wanna ban pork because the scripture says so, then i have nothing to say. But if u ban pork because u deemed it to be a health hazard, then I can tell u it is wrong and pork is as safe as other meat sources. Tis is particularly true since pigs r being reared in conditions similar to the rearing of cows and sheeps. Look at the chinese and japanese, who had ate pork all their lives. They r the ones tat had lived the longest isn't it ?
How do you know whether it's an evolved species or a different species? It could always have been a whole different species that's extinct!
How about tis then.
http://www.nmsr.org/nylon.htmIt spoke of the discovery of a bug tat digest nylon ? It is well known tat nylon is invented by men only after 1930's. How come there r bugs tat can and only digest nylon now ?
Dinosaurs evolved? They could also have been something totally different. A different creature. Why is it that they have to evolve to become their so-called ancestors today? Why deny the possibility that they are a different group of creatures that have been extinct?
It is because we can see gradual changes from time to time of these creatures becoming closer and closer to the species we look at now. There had been many many sites found and they all suggest a gradual but ertain change to the animals we see today.
Another interesting fact about evolution is if a bone, such as a modern crocodile was found in the age of dinosaurs, then tis would be enough to prove the theory of evolution wrong. However tis sort of evidence was never found.
Do u really believe there a species of crocodile all
directly and suddenly extinct, then
out of the blue suddenly popped up a new species of crocodile with enough number for continuing the line tat resembles much to the previous crocodile. (tis must be true. Otherwise a more modern crocodile bones would have been discovered in the past) Tis sudden extinction and sudden appearing of crocodiles have to occured for a few hundred species in order to give us the evidences we see today. If u ask me, it is much highly likely these crocodiles experience a change over the years
It is like seeing pictures of a girl growing up. U can either believe tat it is the same girl tat change and grow up, or believe tat all the pictures r different girls, and they die suddenly and another girl tat resembles to her suddenly popped up. (which is why a picture of an older girl never appears at the age when she was young and vice versa. Much like the bones found) Which is more believable ? Tis analogy is on accepting evidences of changes over time, which include growing up and evolution.
If u believe tat these r a group of animals tat have been extinct, u still have to acknowledge tat modern crocodiles only popped up in recent years which meant tat all animals was not created in a single day.
And how's this for evidence-Noah's ark was found somewhere in Iraq. They tested to see how old the wood was (using DNA ageing or something like that to trace it). The wood really was as old as estimated to be.
Why don't u post us a website on tis discovery ? Someone had mentioned about a dustbowl tat was supposed to be noah's ark before but upon further study from sceintist, it is pronounced to be just a natural dust bowl. Even the website of christian answers acknowledge tis fact
"Poopie-Head", does a tadpole evolve into a frog? Does a caterpillar evolve into a butterfly? In appearance the 'baby' is totally dissimilar from its adult shape.
I think u r probably thinking the scientists tat studied these bones to be morons or something... Does a frog grow to be a few hundred metres high (link it with dinosaurs) ? Does a giraffe have a short neck ? no matter how old a frong is, they will never grow to be tat big. No matter how small a giraffe is, they will never have a short neck comapred with proportion to their body. However these bones r found. How do u explain tat ?