Evolution
-
starting thread...I might copy and pate all my un-answered stuff here
-
evolution occurs when a guys is sexually aroused, which results in a surge of blood into the male genitals, peni's. This results in the enlarging of the peni's called evolution. where small peni's evolves into a big peni's.
"AHHH! IT'S EVOLVING", Ash.
issit?
no flamm pls.. -
Evolution is comprised of Triple H, Batista and Ric Flair.
-
Answer= we dont need to be. We werent there when prehistoric trees, or dinosaurs existed. And we werent there when the land was one big mass, but we know FOR SURE it existed. Why? Coz of evidence! Whatever happened in the past left physical evidence and that's how we get to know the past better.
But the plates are still moving, and since they are still moving we can estimate that the land was once one big mass. If the plates are not moving now, we never would have known. From this, we know that the plates are getting "cracked up", which means the plates were once whole.
Which also means if the plates are not moving now, we wouldn't have known. Floating on magma without moving (which is impossible!), that would mean that the land never changes.
In the case of evolution, It is not happening to us right now. If we are still evolving now, we wouldn't need to trace our past.
>> Where did u read that scientists claim dinosaurs are 'not reptiles'? Pls provide links? thanks
I didn't get this from a website. I got this from reading many books. If you check old books, they'd most likely say that they are categorised as reptiles. Check the latest ones. If you just search you might get it.
Pls dont be mistaken that the moving plates have gotta do with evolution. Refer to above why i mentioned it.
Alright.
Yeah, we can observe the plates move. But NO SINGLE PERSON saw the land when it was one big mass. So does that make it untrue? Since no one saw it?
Answer= No! We know for sure it was.
Explained above.
The point is - do u agree that we dont need people to be present to prove something happened? Whatever happened have left traces or evidence for us and thats how we get to know about stuff from the past.
It depends. See the plate example.
There are hundreds (maybe thousands) of Noah's Ark stories. Refer to http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CH/CH500.html
They used the DNA ageing thing and it really was as old as estimated to be.
Some of the stories could be fakes.
Frankly speaking, I don't trust the net. I don't trust that site either. You can search for one thing and get opposing answers from different websites, both with evidence. Even evidence can be lies. Images can be edited.
The info I get is from a reliable source...it's kind of a private thing, so I believe no further elaboration is needed.
Saying this, I don't expect anyone to trust my claims either. I'm just a stranger on the net to everyone.
So far, people keep talking but no evidence have been brought forward. The talk about the wood, where is it now? Somehow important evidence disappears.
I'm sure they have it. What I said about Noah's Ark is all I know, and I think testing to see how old it was proves a lot.
BTW, the measurements of the Ark is impossible to keep the huge number of animals. Already proven by calculation.
What happened to "Where's the wood?" I thought you said there was no evidence. With no ship, how do you even calculate that?
Ok, finally my question for you is:
Do u still believe that we need witnesses in order to prove something happened?
Read above. -
By the way, this thread is continued from the "Chineseby marries Muslimgirl-Scenario" thread.
It was created since the the thing was going off topic. -
In response to your claim that no new species had been observed, please refer to:
http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB910.html
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/speciation.html
http://users.rcn.com/jkimball.ma.ultranet/BiologyPages/S/Speciation.html
These are just some of the observed speciation recorded in history.
Convinced yet?
No. To prevent offense, I think it's better for us to settle this privately. -
I'm gonna take some time ot answer stuff...so poopie-head and SIS, I hope you don't mind waiting a while...or else too many things to answer!
-
why god created 3 different colour human?
black white and yellow?
according to hardboyism, god was shiiting after that he look at his shiit. he thought it be fun making something out of it, so he created a human shape and make it alive. black people were borned.
then he thought he'll make something from his sperm too. so he masturbate and make a human shape out of his sperm and make it alive. white people were born.
now he's getting adventurous. he decided he should mix his sperm with his shiit and see what would happen. so he shiit then mast and shoot sperm on the shiit stir them up and make a human shape. yellow people were born.
funny hor? jajajaja
of course not lah you dumbass. its all evolution due to different living locations which conditioned us into what we see as different human races.
i'm so clever -
so clever...Originally posted by hard boy:why god created 3 different colour human?
black white and yellow?
according to hardboyism, god was shiiting after that he look at his shiit. he thought it be fun making something out of it, so he created a human shape and make it alive. black people were borned.
then he thought he'll make something from his sperm too. so he masturbate and make a human shape out of his sperm and make it alive. white people were born.
now he's getting adventurous. he decided he should mix his sperm with his shiit and see what would happen. so he shiit then mast and shoot sperm on the shiit stir them up and make a human shape. yellow people were born.
funny hor? jajajaja
of course not lah you dumbass. its all evolution due to different living locations which conditioned us into what we see as different human races.
i'm so clever *clap* *clap* -
can any1 explain the evolution of gays like me?
-
what evolution do u want? u've got no evolution in u at all, u'r just a pc of ShitOriginally posted by GaM_bOy:can any1 explain the evolution of gays like me? -
POUR OVER?Originally posted by 6White_Pawn9:
Answer= we dont need to be. We werent there when prehistoric trees, or dinosaurs existed. And we werent there when the land was one big mass, but we know FOR SURE it existed. Why? Coz of evidence! Whatever happened in the past left physical evidence and that's how we get to know the past better.
But the plates are still moving, and since they are still moving we can estimate that the land was once one big mass. If the plates are not moving now, we never would have known. From this, we know that the plates are getting "cracked up", which means the plates were once whole.
Which also means if the plates are not moving now, we wouldn't have known. Floating on magma without moving (which is impossible!), that would mean that the land never changes.
In the case of evolution, It is not happening to us right now. If we are still evolving now, we wouldn't need to trace our past.
>> Where did u read that scientists claim dinosaurs are 'not reptiles'? Pls provide links? thanks
I didn't get this from a website. I got this from reading many books. If you check old books, they'd most likely say that they are categorised as reptiles. Check the latest ones. If you just search you might get it.
Pls dont be mistaken that the moving plates have gotta do with evolution. Refer to above why i mentioned it.
Alright.
Yeah, we can observe the plates move. But NO SINGLE PERSON saw the land when it was one big mass. So does that make it untrue? Since no one saw it?
Answer= No! We know for sure it was.
Explained above.
The point is - do u agree that we dont need people to be present to prove something happened? Whatever happened have left traces or evidence for us and thats how we get to know about stuff from the past.
It depends. See the plate example.
There are hundreds (maybe thousands) of Noah's Ark stories. Refer to http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CH/CH500.html
They used the DNA ageing thing and it really was as old as estimated to be.
Some of the stories could be fakes.
Frankly speaking, I don't trust the net. I don't trust that site either. You can search for one thing and get opposing answers from different websites, both with evidence. Even evidence can be lies. Images can be edited.
The info I get is from a reliable source...it's kind of a private thing, so I believe no further elaboration is needed.
Saying this, I don't expect anyone to trust my claims either. I'm just a stranger on the net to everyone.
So far, people keep talking but no evidence have been brought forward. The talk about the wood, where is it now? Somehow important evidence disappears.
I'm sure they have it. What I said about Noah's Ark is all I know, and I think testing to see how old it was proves a lot.
BTW, the measurements of the Ark is impossible to keep the huge number of animals. Already proven by calculation.
What happened to "Where's the wood?" I thought you said there was no evidence. With no ship, how do you even calculate that?
Ok, finally my question for you is:
Do u still believe that we need witnesses in order to prove something happened?
Read above. -
But the plates are still moving, and since they are still moving we can estimate that the land was once one big mass. If the plates are not moving now, we never would have known. From this, we know that the plates are getting "cracked up", which means the plates were once whole.
U never see the acts of god describe in your scripture too isn't it ? U never see adam and eve, u never see moses, u never see fire from the sky tat burn cities. Then why do u believe in it ?
Which also means if the plates are not moving now, we wouldn't have known. Floating on magma without moving (which is impossible!), that would mean that the land never changes.
In the case of evolution, It is not happening to us right now. If we are still evolving now, we wouldn't need to trace our past.
>> Where did u read that scientists claim dinosaurs are 'not reptiles'? Pls provide links? thanks
I didn't get this from a website. I got this from reading many books. If you check old books, they'd most likely say that they are categorised as reptiles. Check the latest ones. If you just search you might get it.
In the case of evolution, many examples r given to u but u refuse to acknowledge these examples. I have told u about a bug tat digest nylon. Nylon was invented by man after 1930. Wat is your explanation of such symptoms ?
I give another evidence of evolution. There r certain mutations in animals in a large population. However the mutation will have to be limited to the organs or body parts that u possessed. U can have a mutated leg, mutated eyes and mutated hands. However if u have a mutation where it doesn't appear in yoru body, then it means tis r latent body parts, meaning somewhere in the chain of evolution u have these body parts before. So now I present to u a whale which is found to have a "leg with toes".
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/section2.html#atavisms_ex1
How do u explain tat ? Why will a whale have leg unless somewhere in their chain of evolution, they are creatures with legs. Tis match with fossil records.
"I knew, of course, that some modern whales have a pair of bones embedded in their tissues, each of which strengthens the pelvic wall and acts as an organ anchor. ... Whales could be born with a little extra lump of bone which evolutionists therefore insisted was a throwback corresponding to a second limb bone.
However, the spectacle of a whale being hauled out of the ocean with an actual leg hanging down from its side was a totally different issue. I don't remember my exact response, but I indicated that, if true, this would be a serious challenge to explain on the basis of a creation model."
- Carl Wieland
Young earth creationist,
CEO, Answers in Genesis - Australia,
Joint CEO, Answers in Genesis International,
Editor, Creation magazineThey used the DNA ageing thing and it really was as old as estimated to be.
If I don't trust the net, then should I trust u ? U never show me anything and I don't really supposed I have any grounds to believe in it. If it is found to be true, then why keep it a secret ?!? Don't u want to prove noah's ark exists ? Won't it strengthen the faith of your people ? Displaying such secrecy already admits it cannot be under scrutiny of world scientists.
Some of the stories could be fakes.
Frankly speaking, I don't trust the net. I don't trust that site either. You can search for one thing and get opposing answers from different websites, both with evidence. Even evidence can be lies. Images can be edited.
The info I get is from a reliable source...it's kind of a private thing, so I believe no further elaboration is needed.
Saying this, I don't expect anyone to trust my claims either. I'm just a stranger on the net to everyone.I'm sure they have it. What I said about Noah's Ark is all I know, and I think testing to see how old it was proves a lot.
A dust bowl can be as old as anything. In fact I was doubting if the age is really tat old since u show me nothing. Talk is cheap u know. I can say I knew a deity from a certain religion which can prove all the other religion wrong. but I have to keep it hush and a secret so u cannot get to see him. In fact I can even say I keep a pink unicorn and a purple hippo who is as old as noah's ark but I cannot tell u anything more about it.What happened to "Where's the wood?" I thought you said there was no evidence. With no ship, how do you even calculate that?
I had read the bible and in it they stated the exact dimensions and material for the ship. Using simple mathematical calculations, it was found tat the a pair of the whole beetle race will requires a ship much greater than the size of noah's ark. And tis doesn't even include the water and food required for survival. So we don't even need to see wood. Even if the scripture is true about noah's ark (IMO highly likely to be false), it was still impossible to carry all the animals. -
Huh?Originally posted by 6White_Pawn9:starting thread...I might copy and pate all my un-answered stuff here
I tot its either Darwin's Theory or an Email tool called Evolution ... -
Yoyoyo, this is getting too outta hand. Come on, why drag youselves into an endless spiral of philosophical argument about evolution over such a simple topic? Cool down guys, cool it! There are other things which are more worthwhile in accomplishing, not some argument here which will not arrive at any tangible result in the forseeable future...
Just my two-hundredths of a dollar worth... -
Hey this discussion has been moved to another site. Only the user Poopie-Head and I only are able to access it. If anyone is SERIOUSLY interested, PM me or Poopie-Head
