I thought the application for the Sentosa party was rejected because it was filed by a gay activist?Originally posted by aRcTiC_sTaR:What has the party in Sentosa got to do with HIV? It ain't an orgy anyway.
its the party after the one on the beach.Originally posted by aRcTiC_sTaR:What has the party in Sentosa got to do with HIV? It ain't an orgy anyway.
I think the highlighted portion is the cause of rising HIV cases among the gay community. The SAF and SPF are so 1950.Originally posted by chikopek:You are a 302?
BTW, to those who want to keng -- Better not to keng by declare you are 302 as you will be charged by the police if you gets married later in your life and it is not worth as it will affect your whole life because of 2 years.
funny thing is... why they kpkb so much about that 33% and tiam tiam about the other 67%?????? looking for scapegoat?Originally posted by kryslow:Of the sexually active male population the majority are heterosexual, only a small proportion are gays (maybe 3%? 5%?...) but gays account for 33% of HIV cases which is disproportionally high! It means more gays are engaging in unprotected sex.
During the past few years the only new factor that could have contributed to this is the annual gay party which was allowed since 2001.
So it was only logical to suspect the gay parties to be the cause.