Originally posted by Chewbacca:
good story....but is this for real, sounds suspicious here:s why some parts are convincing while some r not
Convincing parts: Timeline and setting in 1992, yeah during this period and before there were widespread mediums in Singapore, Chinese , Indian and Malays.And the ladies during this period and before were actually unfaithful as many of them were just O level educated and from the baby boomer generation.Plus Singapore society had been moderately plagued with such problems since the 80s and carried over over to the early 90s and suspicious info...Also that him mum shrugs off with giggles and laughter when the men make their advances seem to point to a insecure and gullible woman..Another thing to note is that he stated his mum was in her late 20s,He 13 which means he was born to his mum when she still very young at 15 or 16 which seem probable at the time when girls get married off early
Unconvincing parts: The way sexual acts had been described sounds like coming from someone plagued by peversion.Makes the whole thing sound like an erotic story borrowed from a sex website.
Verdict: If this story is false cause a person who may been psychologically affected by such a trauma would not go so deep in describing his experience so indepth to the point it become perversion.On the other hand it could be true if the individual hates his mother and psychologically conditioned with negative beliefs about life and people.He begins to ravel in these negative environment doing and saying things in the same light.Further more what is convincing could be also unconvincing in the fact that it could all be made up to perfection
This story is probably false
[b]Dont kid me dude, i have a cert in psychology[/b]
thanks for ur last sentence in bold, saved me time from reading the post.
