sggirls.com on the news
-
Hey.. sggirls.com on the news...
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/148735/1/.html
SINGAPORE: A website featuring what seem to be Singapore schoolgirls in sexually suggestive poses has caused a furore among parents.
The pictures have been seen on sggirls.com, a website that is hosted on a US server.
There are pictures of girls locking lips with each other, or striking various suggestive poses.
Some poses suggest the possibility of a lesbian relationship.
Many of the girls in the pictures are in clearly identifiable uniforms of reputable local girlsÂ’ schools, and their faces are also clearly seen.
The suggestive pictures have not only outraged but also worried parents.
"They are terrible, not like our time. During our time, we don't behave like this. We'd feel shy," said a parent.
"Very disgusting. They shouldn't be involved in this," said another.
Some schoolgirls Channel NewsAsia spoke to said they knew some of those featured.
But some maintained the girls were victims of cruel pranks, possibly by friends who took the pictures.
"My friend's picture was on it. She was wondering why her picture was there and she was quite scared," said a student.
But some students acknowledged it was also possible that some of these raunchy pictures were posted by the girls themselves.
"There are some students who put these photos deliberately on the Net and this is quite bad. It reflects badly on themselves and on the school," said a student.
The website came to Channel NewsAsia's attention last week when a concerned father emailed Channel NewsAsia to say he caught his 16-year-old daughter looking at the website.
According to the email, the girl, who is from a reputable all girls' school, told her father that "she was under peer pressure to pose such provocative and sexy pictures in this website in order to gain recognition."
Channel NewsAsia wrote to the Education Ministry for its comment on the issue.
In its email response, the Education Ministry says homosexuality is covered in an existing sexuality education programme.
In the "Growing Years" VCD distributed to lower secondary schools, the term "homosexual" is explained, and the difference between sexual identity and sexual orientation is clarified.
And students struggling with such feelings are also encouraged to talk to an adult they trust.
As for teachers on the sexuality education programme, the MOE says that they have also been advised to "relate to lesbian students as individuals, with needs for love, understanding and acceptance as their peers have."
Channel NewsAsia understands the website belongs to a 24-year-old Singaporean who is studying economics in the UK.
He had set it up when he was a 17-year-old pre-university student in Singapore.
At that time, the website was known as jcgirls.com. - CNA/ir -
sg girls..? pa buay toh! weeuweet
-
old news
-
Its only a matter of time, unless the owner is not planning to come back. Then the authorities will go for the forum moderator....wait for chapter 2 of this saga. I think Sammy boy is a safer place to crap about all things
-
oi authorities go after the moderator for what..? this is nothing illegal. its a free country and we have freedom of speech to talk about sex and EVERYWHERE talks about sex and see girls in lingerie in every mens and womens magazine also
-
stfuOriginally posted by {}==[GOD OF FUCK:::;;::>:oi authorities go after the moderator for what..? this is nothing illegal. its a free country and we have freedom of speech to talk about sex and EVERYWHERE talks about sex and see girls in lingerie in every mens and womens magazine also -
wtf u say stfu for?
YOU continue sucking my dogs c@#% and stfu kthx -
stfu SHIT eaterOriginally posted by {}==[GOD OF FUCK:::;;::>:wtf u say stfu for?
YOU continue sucking my dogs c@#% and stfu kthx -
last time i checked i don't remember seeing freedom of speech in our constitution, but i do think that the guy hasn't done anything illegal under present "laws" but i guess if they do want to get him its not very hard to change thigns since they do have to power.Originally posted by {}==[GOD OF FUCK:::;;::>:oi authorities go after the moderator for what..? this is nothing illegal. its a free country and we have freedom of speech to talk about sex and EVERYWHERE talks about sex and see girls in lingerie in every mens and womens magazine also -
this is bad.
-
I remember JCgirls was in the spotlight back in 1999 or 2000 because some people claimed they were surreptitiously photographed and the photographs uploaded onto the web.
Anyway, I hope the economics student in question (you know who :mrgreen
agrees to share his power with up to eight others in order to spruce up both SGG and SGF. Having more administrators helps contain flaming as there are more people to keep watch on flamers and delete their posts if necessary. -
At one point, they're focusing on the photos of school girls uploaded in the website. Next they're talking about lesbianism. I have no idea what they're up to.lolx
-
At least the spotlight is off the gay community for a change.Originally posted by y33bas:At one point, they're focusing on the photos of school girls uploaded in the website. Next they're talking about lesbianism. I have no idea what they're up to.lolx
-
Ignorant parents who refuse to take ownership of their children's upbringing.End of discussion.IF the girls want to have fun, so be it.IF their parents are concerned, best way is to talk to them, no point flooding the goddamned place and embarassing some of their kids as well.Ignorant idiots.
-
Com'on, as we all know, lesbianism is a phase tt is very prevalent in schools, esp girl schools. Parents r juz living in denial tt their kids r still their sweet innocent babies. Sb should juz educate the parents wat is exactly going on so tt there will be less reports abt sggirls in the news.
-
they just wanna make it private and "lock" it so that they can have it for themselves
-
+1 to hilarity!