Taxi companies ???? Tell that to our Union ........Originally posted by oxford mushroom:Taxi companies have been campaigning for years to be allowed to bring in foreign cabbies. It's the government who has been trying to protect the livelihood of our cab drivers, probably knowing that they are inefficient and cannot compete.
Are taxi drivers grateful to the government? They are the ones who always rant against the government and complain to every passenger the faults of the leadership. Time for the government to wake up and force these lot to compete like everyone else.
If others can do the job better than you for lower pay, either you buck up or you lose your job! Time for the government to realize that protecting these lazy uncles does not get them more votes. On the contrary it stokes the anger of most Singaporeans each time cab fare rises and mars the image of Singapore as a tourist destination when people cannot find cabs.
Bring in foreign cabbies!
Oh yeah , hahahaha dream on ....... want foreign drivers ? Go New York Manhatten ......... u'll find lots of mexican drivers who dunno where's Manhatten City Centre , hahahahaha.....Originally posted by oxford mushroom:IN THE evening of the day before my Registry of Marriages wedding ceremony on June 2, I booked a taxi to pick up our solemniser and take her to the service. Confirmation was made and the taxi number given. We were totally unprepared, therefore, when the taxi failed to turn up at the appointed and booked time.
Frantic phone calls were then exchanged between the solemniser, us and the taxi service to make alternative arrangements as well as find out what had happened and why the taxi did not turn up. By then, our solemniser was very anxious and frustrated and quite rightly furious at not being picked up on time.
This frustration and anxiety was felt most keenly by my bride, who while ironing out last minute details, was also trying to arrange alternative transport for the solemniser. All this caused her mood to deteriorate rapidly. Imagine having everything organised and then watching as it threatened to fall apart at the seams because of a taxi.
Our solemniser even went out to the main road to flag down a passing taxi. In the end, the alternative taxi we arranged picked her up. All this caused our ceremony to be delayed longer and longer.
Luckily, at the Furama Riverfront Hotel, our event manager Jason Ang and staff were by now aware of what had happened. They reassured us everything would turn out just fine and not to worry. They took great pains to ensure the guests were comfortable and had drinks and nibbles.
The solemniser turned up and we proceeded with the ceremony, but the stress caused by this had disastrous consequences. My bride and I had no time to enjoy what was supposed to be our big day and it turned out to be memorable for all the wrong reasons. It is hard to enjoy something this important when you are still getting over the close brush with disaster you have just had.
Only through prompt action by our friends and excellent service from Mr Ang and the staff at Furama Riverfront Hotel did our day proceed at all, and we gratefully acknowledge their special efforts for us.
So, all brides and grooms- to-be, ensure you not only book your taxi and confirm it, but also check again a couple of hours before it is due to ensure it will actually turn up.
John Tunstall
Queensland, Australia
(20 June, Straits Times)
The groundswell of discontent is rising....bring in foreign cabbies. Singaporean drivers are too lazy and do not provide a good service. Let the foreigners drive cabs and force these lazy uncles to work harder.
True on worst drivers shortage ..... not true most expensive fare .....Originally posted by iveco:I thought SMRT Taxis having the worst driver shortage and the most expensive fares?
And do you know the real reason why SG cabbies don't vote for the ruling party?Originally posted by oxford mushroom:Dun laugh too loud...elections are over. If more tourists and Singaporeans continue to exert pressure on the government they will relent.
Singaporean taxi drivers dun vote for the government anyway...we do! If they want our votes, who do you think they would listen to?![]()
Ya la ya la , u pink ic , we not pink la , blue ic la ..... u're right la ..... hahahahah ....Originally posted by oxford mushroom:Dun laugh too loud...elections are over. If more tourists and Singaporeans continue to exert pressure on the government they will relent.
Singaporean taxi drivers dun vote for the government anyway...we do! If they want our votes, who do you think they would listen to?![]()
True, but at the very least they will not need to raise fares. Someone has suggested putting up the starting fare to $4 (the elderly only pay $4 to see a doctor at the polyclinic in comparison). But I think there is a good chance fares will drop if we flood the market with cabbies.Originally posted by Kuali Baba:Are you talking about introducing a foreign player to set up a taxi company that hires foreigners, OM?
If not, what makes you so certain that taxi companies will reduce their fares when they bring in cheaper drivers? They may as well sustain the rates and enjoy the bigger profit margins.
What for go to all this trouble?Originally posted by oxford mushroom:True, but at the very least they will not need to raise fares. Someone has suggested putting up the starting fare to $4 (the elderly only pay $4 to see a doctor at the polyclinic in comparison). But I think there is a good chance fares will drop if we flood the market with cabbies.
Bring in foreign cabbies and relieve the shortage of cabs. It is Singaporeans who complain about the difficulty of getting cabs that bring up the fares...cos' if the demand outstrips supply, you have to raise fares to entice cabbies to work harder. Bring in foreigners and there will be a glut of cabs around. If supply outstrips demand, they will have to lower the fares to attract MRT and bus passengers to use taxis.
They're not hungry?Originally posted by oxford mushroom:This is a post in the Straits Times and it explains the problem we have: it's not just a management issue...it's just that cabbies are not willing to work hard enough:
"The only BOLD & Holistic solution is to remove all surcharges, including booking charges. The ONLY reason why most cabbies CAN afford to play hide and seek is because there are not hungry at all; hunger will drive a person to make a living no matter the hardship. In other words, when you think you have enough, then you can afford to wait and choose your passenger, and complain about this-and-that. A cabby who has to bring food to the table for his/her family and kids, and is not earning enough for the day, will grab any passenger he/she comes across.
Posted by: LauSikKong at Mon Jun 25 12:23:48 SGT 2007"
Flood the market with foreign cabbies and we will see a great improvement. This government must stop protecting local cabbies...protectionism yields inefficiency and raises costs.
What a joke! Go read the forum page. The problem is not the booking system. There is no rule that requires a cabbie to throw a passenger out to accept a booking when his taxi is occupied. Check your information and not just rely on old wives' tales.Originally posted by LazerLordz:They're not hungry?
Have these people actually talked to the cabbies, and taken enough cabs to understand their issues?
All talking through their ass, when the pressing issue at the moment raised by commuters and taxi drivers themselves is that they have to kick people out of a cab the minute the system allocates them a booking, and they are penalised if they reject too many bookings.
If this is not management and policy shortcoming, then what is? Any lack of progress on their side will not make things improve even if foreign companies come into the market. Because the industry practice will still remain.
Do spend time talking to the cabbies when you are in one, you will find out more than specious crap in the ST forum. One letter is nothing.