hmm...this car ar...i not really like this car..but still finds it acceptable..
not because it is buatan malaysia or because it is proton..but because of the specs i read from it..
i was wondering why the AT version fuel consumption is lower than of the MT version?Making the AT version more fuel economic.another thing is that,the impression of the car i got was that it seems heavy..in which is bad for a sports car..
well,lets hear from the masses or some owners of GEN 2..
to me,getting a Gen 2, i rather pay more to get myself mazda 3 sports edition..hehe..
