pick up will be quite disadvantageous coz the TS is bogged down with the heavier AWD transmission. handling shd be better than most 1.6 around though.Originally posted by silv3rgal:Saw a couple of nicely modified (exterior i mean) 1.6TS out there... personally I prefer the exterior of 1.6TS but I was just wondering how is it's performance like compared to other 1.6L cars....
I see....so the fuel consumption's a lil' higher than normal 1.6L cars too?Originally posted by tailslide:pick up will be quite disadvantageous coz the TS is bogged down with the heavier AWD transmission. handling shd be better than most 1.6 around though.
i would say that it should be slightly higher than average after factoring in the additional transmission losses. but i've not heard any outrageously unacceptable fc readings. most 1.6 are getting 14 kms/l so u are probably looking at the ballpark of 12 -13 kms/l for the TS. any TS owners here wanna chip in their own figures?Originally posted by silv3rgal:I see....so the fuel consumption's a lil' higher than normal 1.6L cars too?
Out Of Point leh....Originally posted by kopiosatu:i like 2 door hyundai getz![]()
![]()
Yup agree... there's no way a lancer sport can look like an Evo....esp the latest version... i was thinking of getting a TS in maybe 2 years and mod it's exterior.. not really converting to a REX or STi.. but just a get a nice sporty bodykit... but other than exterior wise.. i also wanna make sure that ,maintenance & performance wise it doesn't lose out to other 1.6L cars...thanks for all da info guys... and it would be great if there are lancer or TS drivers who can enlighten me with some pros and cons? ThanksOriginally posted by GLX:In terms of mod-dability, the TS is more advantageous, if you are thinking of converting to a Rex or STI- lookalike (exterior-wise) -- The TS is already wide-body kitted with fenders, headlights, etc. parts like rims are also interchangeable throughout the ts, rex & sti . Ths very much differes from that of the Lancer with its bigger bro - the Evo.
Liddat no pt liao ma....tt means u're trying 2 be a wannabe liao lo...no offense but tts wad i feel...waste unecessary $$ 2 mod up a car (eg lancer 2 look like EVO and TS for WRX) and still be so slow....most prob u'll be the laughing stock of many pplOriginally posted by GLX:In terms of mod-dability, the TS is more advantageous, if you are thinking of converting to a Rex or STI- lookalike (exterior-wise) -- The TS is already wide-body kitted with fenders, headlights, etc. parts like rims are also interchangeable throughout the ts, rex & sti . Ths very much differes from that of the Lancer with its bigger bro - the Evo.
Most 1.6 are only getting 14km/L on paper. Actual figures are lower then that. TS should only be getting 10-12km/LOriginally posted by tailslide:i would say that it should be slightly higher than average after factoring in the additional transmission losses. but i've not heard any outrageously unacceptable fc readings. most 1.6 are getting 14 kms/l so u are probably looking at the ballpark of 12 -13 kms/l for the TS. any TS owners here wanna chip in their own figures?
Originally posted by AE86tofu:Liddat no pt liao ma....tt means u're trying 2 be a wannabe liao lo...no offense but tts wad i feel...waste unecessary $$ 2 mod up a car (eg lancer 2 look like EVO and TS for WRX) and still be so slow....most prob u'll be the laughing stock of many ppl
Not everyone mods to be a wannabe... not a total copy cat, you can mod it ur own style... it just feels good driving a car with a nice bodykit... & it's not for racing purpose... (e.g people don't dress up just to go for fashion shows right?)Originally posted by AE86tofu:Liddat no pt liao ma....tt means u're trying 2 be a wannabe liao lo...no offense but tts wad i feel...waste unecessary $$ 2 mod up a car (eg lancer 2 look like EVO and TS for WRX) and still be so slow....most prob u'll be the laughing stock of many ppl
the BHP of TS @ 96 is based on theory and on road is of total calculations example road condition, tires , load etc etcOriginally posted by JLiN:TS Is Running On A BHP Of 96. If Your Adding Some Bodykit & Changing Rims (Which Is Common), Do Something To Increase Its Horsepower. I'm Not Saying To Turbocharge Or Super Charge It. Cos Its ILLEGAL *Blink Blink*![]()
But Perhaps Change The Manifold For A Better Flowing Unit. Else Its Gonna Be A Car That Can SEE OnlySee. And A Heavier Weight Of Larger Rims & Bodykit Plus 4WD Means Its Not Gonna Be That Fuel Economic. Stock TS Is Running Approx 8.5-9.5 KM/L. (Tried & Tested During Run-In)
Considered One Of The Not So Fuel Saving Machines. However, It Also Depends On How U Rev The Ride. (Lightfoot Driving/ Flooring e Throttle)
However, I'd Still Choose The TS Over e Lancer. Simple Mods Can Make It Look Even More Beautiful. With A Bodykit, Carbon Fibre/ Fibre Glass Bonnet, Front Scoop, 17" Rims + GT/ Hi Mount Spoiler,
Simply A Piece Of Classic~~
Just My 2Cents Worth!
if u realli interested in the inner things about driving and handling..go for the rex...otherwise just stick to lancer sports lor....just my 2 cents worth...Originally posted by silv3rgal:Juz wondering.....Which is better?![]()
Rex? Or the TS?Originally posted by Lance_han:if u realli interested in the inner things about driving and handling..go for the rex...otherwise just stick to lancer sports lor....just my 2 cents worth...
eh???Originally posted by silv3rgal:Rex? Or the TS?
how to compare a Rex and lancer sports?![]()
Rex and TS not the same... From the weakest to the strongest, its TS, WRX (Rex) then STi... comparing with the Lancer, its Lancer, Lancer sports, then Evo...Originally posted by Lance_han:eh???
me blur... Rex and TS not the same meh???if not sori...i car noob...
but btw there's a diff between lancer sports and TS but be4 we go there...how about u asking yourself wad u wan in your car... if u can answer tat...need i sae more??![]()
Originally posted by Lance_han:Sorry i don't think u need to say more... since u don't know the difference between rex and TS :p
eh???
me blur... Rex and TS not the same meh???if not sori...i car noob...
but btw there's a diff between lancer sports and TS but be4 we go there...how about u asking yourself wad u wan in your car... if u can answer tat...[b]need i sae more??[/b]
Originally posted by silv3rgal:Sorry i don't think u need to say more... since u don't know the difference between rex and TS :p
TS is a 1.6L Subaru Impreza with only 95bhp, top speed @ 174km/h
Rex (WRX) is a 2.0L Impreza , 225bhp, top speed @ 232kmh... and lots more of differences....acceleration,torque, etc etc.. maybe u can go check it out urself
I was just asking for suggestions from fellow forum-ers w/ knowledge about pros, cons and performance of these 2 cars.... not asking u to tell me what i want in my car.. lol.. so please......u don't need to say anymore
while its good to plan.... a lot can happen in 2 years... specifically... newer.. better looking... more mod-able models might and in all probability appear... after which ur plans would be screwed up... and... tho i am not sure... i have a feeling that the impreza would be up for "renewal" in abt that kinda time frame too..Originally posted by silv3rgal:Yup agree... there's no way a lancer sport can look like an Evo....esp the latest version... i was thinking of getting a TS in maybe 2 years and mod it's exterior.. not really converting to a REX or STi.. but just a get a nice sporty bodykit... but other than exterior wise.. i also wanna make sure that ,maintenance & performance wise it doesn't lose out to other 1.6L cars...thanks for all da info guys... and it would be great if there are lancer or TS drivers who can enlighten me with some pros and cons? Thanks