Tuscani vs. mazda3 GTS vs. integra iS
-
i considering this 3 cars. which would be a value for money ?
2.0L Tuscani vs. 1.6L mazda3 GTS which one is faster?
Of coz Integra the best but 20k more... both 2L.
2.0L Tuscani vs. 2.0L intergra iS?? will tuscani lose out alot ??
Intergra FC vs. Tuscani FC ? which one is uses lesser fuel ??
Actually Celica is quite nice but its too low.
I compared the stats and the power and torqe are about the same for both Tuscani and Integra but performance wise alot diff ? -
Can compare meh?
All cars seems to be from different categories. -
celica low meh? the only problem is only got PI. other than that it's damn cool.
-
Originally posted by seow:Can compare meh?
All cars seems to be from different categories.
why not ?
ya la which one value for money cannot compare la,
but which one faster wise can compare mah and FC(fuel comsumption) can also be compare
right ? -
Originally posted by seow:Can compare meh?
All cars seems to be from different categories. why not ?
ya la which one value for money cannot compare la,
but which one faster wise can compare mah and FC(fuel comsumption) can also be compare right ? -
Originally posted by seow:Can compare meh?
All cars seems to be from different categories. why not ?
ya la which one value for money cannot compare la,
but which one faster wise can compare mah and FC(fuel comsumption) can also be compare right ? -
dun think u know much abt cars.Originally posted by zc11: why not ?
ya la which one value for money cannot compare la,
but which one faster wise can compare mah and FC(fuel comsumption) can also be compare right ?
better do more resreach yrself. -
what do u mean? if u are so good why not teach me something instead of saying me?Originally posted by elfhunter:dun think u know much abt cars.
better do more resreach yrself. at least it will help 
right?
AND... OF COZ I GOT SOMETHING I NOT SURE OR DUNNO THATS WHY I WILL POST A THREAD AND ASK FOR OPINION RIGHT??? ISNT IT WAT A THREAD SUPPOSE TO BE??? OR FOR U THE THREAD IS JUZ A PLACE TO GET A CHANCE TO SAY OTHER PPLE ???
i wonder...
if everyone is to go do research then wat is a thread for? for pple to quarrel ? -
mazda 3 GTS - gd looks, but body seems heavy & pick up is laggy. 1.6 vs 2.0. lower maintainence, road tax & difference in coe.
tuscani v integra is - both process gd looks but tuscani is much cheaper. not sure abt it's FC but i think wif the difference of almost 20k, i would rather go for tuscani. cuz at the end of the day, u still got 20k in ur pocket. unless u're talking abt type r. otherwise tuscani should be a gd bid. -
think u have an obvious answer. the 2 coupes are slow pokes and the mazda is over priced. think if u want value (dat, i take 2 mean cheap), juz go for the cheapest amongst the 3. none of them worth buying IMOOriginally posted by zc11:i considering this 3 cars. which would be a value for money ?
2.0L Tuscani vs. 1.6L mazda3 GTS which one is faster?
Of coz Integra the best but 20k more... both 2L.
2.0L Tuscani vs. 2.0L intergra iS?? will tuscani lose out alot ??
Intergra FC vs. Tuscani FC ? which one is uses lesser fuel ??
Actually Celica is quite nice but its too low.
I compared the stats and the power and torqe are about the same for both Tuscani and Integra but performance wise alot diff ? 
-
I personally think that the Mazda 3 has the looks, but it's performance is questionable. Haven't seen any fast mid-sized Mazdas around.
The Tuscani is cheap, but still it's Korean, i doubt it can remain trouble-free for long. Plus i heard that service work done at the workshop is bleah.
Intergra seems to be the best bet. You want quality you gotta pay for it right? FC will also have to depend on your driving style, can't always depend on the stats written. -
the mazda3 i talkin about is the hatchback version one.
ok so if i lets say consider madza3 GTS (hatchback) vs. Tuscani.
which one would y guys vote for ??
i test drived a mazda3 GTS and its seem quite powerful for a 1.6 but will it be faster than a tuscani ?
is tuscani really that slow ? becoz i heard of pple saying family saloon/ sedan also can win tuscani ??
actually i lookin for a car more for its sporty look ? so which one should i get?
actually i not really into hyundai but this coupe seems ok la. and its new so the problematic part of hyundai shoudnt be a problem. 3yr/100k km.
ok la i would say both looks sporty.
so how ???? -
eh.. three cars in three different catergory....
simple theory.. you want four door -> mazda
you want budget coupe - > tus
you want power -> integra -
BLOODY FOOL, I AM ASKING YOU TO DO RESEARCH SO THAT YOU BE WILL NOT ASK STUPID QUESTION. ASK IF YOU ARE UNSURE ABT SOMETHING, BUT IF U DUN KNOW EVERYTHING, GO FIND OUT!!Originally posted by zc11:what do u mean? if u are so good why not teach me something instead of saying me? at least it will help right?
AND... OF COZ I GOT SOMETHING I NOT SURE OR DUNNO THATS WHY I WILL POST A THREAD AND ASK FOR OPINION RIGHT??? ISNT IT WAT A THREAD SUPPOSE TO BE??? OR FOR U THE THREAD IS JUZ A PLACE TO GET A CHANCE TO SAY OTHER PPLE ???
i wonder...
if everyone is to go do research then wat is a thread for? for pple to quarrel ?
DUN CAP YR WORDS!! -
can consider the 2.7L tuscani perhaps. the fc would probably kill though.
-
buy none of them coz their price dont justify their performance
-
u wan know how slow the tuscani is?Originally posted by zc11:i considering this 3 cars. which would be a value for money ?
2.0L Tuscani vs. 1.6L mazda3 GTS which one is faster?
Of coz Integra the best but 20k more... both 2L.
2.0L Tuscani vs. 2.0L intergra iS?? will tuscani lose out alot ??
Intergra FC vs. Tuscani FC ? which one is uses lesser fuel ??
Actually Celica is quite nice but its too low.
I compared the stats and the power and torqe are about the same for both Tuscani and Integra but performance wise alot diff ?
we try b4, tunscani vs getz 1.6M 3DR
getz tear tunscani many car length!!
1.6mazda not gd also, very heavy, 1300kg for 1.6 car..WTF.. -
i agree that tuscani is a bad choice... besides its good look and cheap price tag, its a high FC car with very slow pick up. unless u get the 2.7 V6 model, the performance will definitely outclass the other two... depreciation can also kill ya.... korean cars cant last long-term too... most prob/fault will occur after 4-5 yrs time... (correct me if someone out there still has a smooth ride after 4-5 yrs of driving a korean car)
Mazda 3 is well-known for heavy... FC is quite high too... its only good points are its performance and nice sporty look... boot size may be small for golfers...
as for integra, i heard that its performance is only so-so... it has a more "fierce" look than the other two here... but the rear seats can hardly squeeze in a small-bulit adult... unless u are a single who drives around to pick up pretty babes, then this two-door coupe is ur choice... -
So wat if i cap my words ?? not allowed ?Originally posted by elfhunter:BLOODY FOOL, I AM ASKING YOU TO DO RESEARCH SO THAT YOU BE WILL NOT ASK STUPID QUESTION. ASK IF YOU ARE UNSURE ABT SOMETHING, BUT IF U DUN KNOW EVERYTHING, GO FIND OUT!!
DUN CAP YR WORDS!!
No question are stupid unless u are ?
I know about the 3 cars but integra cant be test drived and i cannot tell the performance by looking at the papers. i need someone who drive them b4 to tell me. u FOOL...
If u dun like my questions then stop replying... noob.
and the experience of driving the cars and comfort of the car cannot be tell by looking too. please i am asking for pple who got exp with the cars and their pros and cons..
oMg... bless u. -
by the way,
Thx for all the others who give in valuable comments and advice. i will take it all into consideration when making the decision.
luckily we got more pple who are helpful
-
Well , Tus ..needs mod to improve performance etc yeah its true that Tus is quite draggy interm of pickup.
-
Hi, the 2.7 V6 model Tuscani, is not very powerful, i drove the 2002 Integra Type R and 2005 Integra GSR.Originally posted by keith_typeR:i agree that tuscani is a bad choice... besides its good look and cheap price tag, its a high FC car with very slow pick up. unless u get the 2.7 V6 model, the performance will definitely outclass the other two... depreciation can also kill ya.... korean cars cant last long-term too... most prob/fault will occur after 4-5 yrs time... (correct me if someone out there still has a smooth ride after 4-5 yrs of driving a korean car)
Mazda 3 is well-known for heavy... FC is quite high too... its only good points are its performance and nice sporty look... boot size may be small for golfers...
as for integra, i heard that its performance is only so-so... it has a more "fierce" look than the other two here... but the rear seats can hardly squeeze in a small-bulit adult... unless u are a single who drives around to pick up pretty babes, then this two-door coupe is ur choice...
GSR(A) vs Tuscani both A (real drag tests)
2.0 Tuscani; Totally CMI; GSR can outrun it easily
2.7 Tuscani, Almost equal GSR, short distance win GSR abit, long distance and high speed GSR can chiet it...
The Integra GSR has very good low to mid end torque, its almost flat;it can bring out >16kgm of torque to bear from as low as 2500rpm. and reach maz torque at only 4000rpm. The Type R on the other hand is a high rev performer. At below 4000rpm, the GSR actually feels more torquey. In local context; <120km/h, the GSR is a tough opponent;discounting turbo equipped vehicles.
Regarding the back seat; it is the largest in coupe class; plus the rear flat floor; disgarding roof height, its is very spacious...no problem taking 2/3 adults comfortably....
Regarding Mazda 3, its a looker, but there is no performance to speak off...actually it is more powerful at high speed...due to its variable manifold...
Oh yes, due to its 12/16v configurations, the GSR is super frugal on fuel, no problem getting ~11km/L -
Century sprint for Integra GSR (MT) should be about 8secs.
Integra GSR (A) century sprint is 8.5s and Tuscani 2L (A) is abt 10.5secs
Integra GSR (Type S): 160 bhp
Tuscani 2.0: 143 bhp
Integra Type R: 220 bhp
Tuscani 2.7 V6: 181 bhp
Tuscani
2.0 manual: 0-60 8.8 seconds
2.7 manual: 0-60 7.7 seconds
2.7 auto : 0-60 8.2 seconds -
the 2.7 tuscani sure can catch up or overtake with dc5R after 120km/h
extra 700CC!!
after 100km/h, it always the CC tat count.. -
ernie77 is right... the integra, especially TypeR, has a much better performance than the V6 tuscani.... and its road tax is much lower since its 700cc lesser than the tuscani... and i also agreed tat integra has a better rear leg room than tuscani... after driving one myself... sorry abt the earlier wrong info, zc11... go get the integra man!!!Originally posted by ernie77:Hi, the 2.7 V6 model Tuscani, is not very powerful, i drove the 2002 Integra Type R and 2005 Integra GSR.
GSR(A) vs Tuscani both A (real drag tests)
2.0 Tuscani; Totally CMI; GSR can outrun it easily
2.7 Tuscani, Almost equal GSR, short distance win GSR abit, long distance and high speed GSR can chiet it...
The Integra GSR has very good low to mid end torque, its almost flat;it can bring out >16kgm of torque to bear from as low as 2500rpm. and reach maz torque at only 4000rpm. The Type R on the other hand is a high rev performer. At below 4000rpm, the GSR actually feels more torquey. In local context; <120km/h, the GSR is a tough opponent;discounting turbo equipped vehicles.
Regarding the back seat; it is the largest in coupe class; plus the rear flat floor; disgarding roof height, its is very spacious...no problem taking 2/3 adults comfortably....
Regarding Mazda 3, its a looker, but there is no performance to speak off...actually it is more powerful at high speed...due to its variable manifold...
Oh yes, due to its 12/16v configurations, the GSR is super frugal on fuel, no problem getting ~11km/L