it use a 1800cc engine..and if im right also same engine from CLK200....becoz mag spec both almost sameOriginally posted by t3r:slk is very nice.. especially its F-1 styled nose.... drove an slk200 before.. its very underpowered but nonetheless its still more powerful that many cars out there.. a very reliable car.... if u want more power.. slk350 or 55 will be much betterbut slk200 is enuff to attract babes
![]()
Care to explain why you like the rag-top roadster whose butt resembles that of a Chinese coffin?Originally posted by TwinTurbo_Supra:2 characters.
Z4.![]()
Different strokes for different folks dude!!Originally posted by philia:Care to explain why you like the rag-top roadster whose butt resembles that of a Chinese coffin?
I am trying to understand his stroke through my question.Originally posted by nOrmalbOi:Different strokes for different folks dude!!
-.-lllOriginally posted by philia:Care to explain why you like the rag-top roadster whose butt resembles that of a Chinese coffin?
I guess an explanation is a very demanding and taxing request...Originally posted by TwinTurbo_Supra:-.-lll
i dont know, it just looks and feels more like a sports car.Originally posted by philia:I guess an explanation is a very demanding and taxing request...![]()
![]()
The threadstarter was inquiring about the humble roadster. I do not see whatsoever association between Enzo and SLK.Originally posted by SBS9828X:4 letter to thread starter
Enzo is the wword![]()
slk 200 will be like a lost sheep on track. and money has got nothing 2 do with it.Originally posted by rayshaw23:abit underpower, but hey, u dont drive an slk for track with mitsubishi, subarus, hondas, unless of course u are super rich.... the interior is nice, with leather seats and all.... fully auto roof mechanism of course.... like all convertable roadster, limited boot space. chick factor, i will give it an 8 for the slk200. thats on a scale of 10 if lets say a subaru wrx is a 5? i mean, thats just my honest opinion....
i'm sorry. i was refering that if u have the cash, then maybe u can buy an AMG tuned SL55? thats the one with similar slk chassis right? u get what i mean right? i'm sure an SL55 is comparable to maybe a stock evo on track?Originally posted by tailslide:slk 200 will be like a lost sheep on track. and money has got nothing 2 do with it.![]()
definitely faster. but i think the evo will still have a upper hand in terms of traction being AWD. but in the hands of a competent driver, the SL 55 would definitely be faster.Originally posted by rayshaw23:i'm sorry. i was refering that if u have the cash, then maybe u can buy an AMG tuned SL55? thats the one with similar slk chassis right? u get what i mean right? i'm sure an SL55 is comparable to maybe a stock evo on track?