I thought the turbo kit from thailand is a bolt-on one, so you don't really have to change much on the orginal engine.Originally posted by toymachine:To turbo-charge it isn't that cheap....It's a loop....not just fitting on a turbo
After fixing on a turbo u'll need a intercooler, bigger injectors, ECU and fuel pump....later realised exhaust not pushing out the power from the engine...exhaust system....
Soon the handling won't be up to par, hence coilovers + strut bars etc.....
After that, u'll need to forged low comp pistons to sustain the level of boost...
That's before factoring in the loss of a reliable engine though output power and the fear of White Ants....
Anyway, a vios isn't that under-powered anyway. If u're looking at performance, I think other cars would fit the bill better
85k nowOriginally posted by siaokao:sigh.. bro why bother? Its actually cheaper to go buy a TC car.
Not worth the risk (insurance cover in case something go wrong) worry about ROV/TP roadblocks and the extra workshop time.
toymachine is right, there will be almost "no end" to this kinda mods. Once you spend your efforts (and re$ource$) on the engine.. then u find the suspension and chassis cannot take the power, car cannot handle properly (understeer like crazy), cannot launch properly (wheelspin), keep smelling your bruning clutch, wheel bearing wear out too fast, drive shaft CV join gone... lagi worse, tiny brakes cannot stop the car!!
Hiya, how much a WRX cost now?![]()
i help u summarise........... in short wad is left of the vios is the chassis only......Originally posted by toymachine:To turbo-charge it isn't that cheap....It's a loop....not just fitting on a turbo
After fixing on a turbo u'll need a intercooler, bigger injectors, ECU and fuel pump....later realised exhaust not pushing out the power from the engine...exhaust system....
Soon the handling won't be up to par, hence coilovers + strut bars etc.....
After that, u'll need to forged low comp pistons to sustain the level of boost...
That's before factoring in the loss of a reliable engine though output power and the fear of White Ants....
Anyway, a vios isn't that under-powered anyway. If u're looking at performance, I think other cars would fit the bill better
And not to mention the turbo lag...Originally posted by toymachine:I used to owna a TC my civic....
Although it was fast......and really fun to mod....
The maintainence isn't.....gasket leak, wheel bearings and in the end a blown engine cos i think most of us wouldn't be satisfied by 0.5 bar of boost....
My mechs was tellin me that sice the engine was designed by engineers to be NA , TC isn't goin to be a reliable soulution to enhance power....
engine swapping is better......but illegal though
Interior is one thing that is holding me back from buying a WRX (yes.. even the STi is so plain). Its so sad the new 2006 i believe not much changes to the interior too.Originally posted by Rigante:The WRX is fast, but has a plain interior. Right now it's cheap, but ask those who bought before 2004, people like me, and they will be cursing and swearing at the Subaru brand. 130k dropped to 85k. Even other brands control their prices at around 10k difference.
Very dull interior, hard to clean seats and high fuel consumption don't really make this a good buy after all...If you really want speed, go for STI. WRX is so common on the road nowadays for wannabe speedsters...![]()
Yea, me would go for a STI too. My cousin exchanged his 04 STI with me for a week. Great car to drive with little to complain bout.Originally posted by Rigante:The WRX is fast, but has a plain interior. Right now it's cheap, but ask those who bought before 2004, people like me, and they will be cursing and swearing at the Subaru brand. 130k dropped to 85k. Even other brands control their prices at around 10k difference.
Very dull interior, hard to clean seats and high fuel consumption don't really make this a good buy after all...If you really want speed, go for STI. WRX is so common on the road nowadays for wannabe speedsters...![]()
5-6km/L is crazy...Originally posted by toymachine:Yea, me would go for a STI too. My cousin exchanged his 04 STI with me for a week. Great car to drive with little to complain bout.
Though the interior built quality isn't really up to scratch and creaking sounds can be heard especially on the central dashboard panel.
However, the boxer note is really puts a smile on ur face and AWD is really tops in the handling dept.
About the FC, I was gettin like 5-6 km/L. Had to go to the pump like 3 times a week as i was a bit heavy footed.