erm.. with a light right foot and smooth changing of gears or with a heavy right foot with surging changing of gears?Originally posted by ditzy:What's the FC like?![]()
nope...can say its quite a dream for me to have a car...hahahOriginally posted by CarDreamer:So did u buy the car?
so if thats the case how does this car stack up to its predecessor? the swift GTI?Originally posted by sand king:I like this car, hopping to buy one when I can!!
Beats all other hatch backs and its the only Asian made car i like!
compare apple to apple. not durian vs apple. for a turbo charged car, colt version R isn't really tat fantastic.Originally posted by ecac:with that current price... might as well get a colt version r.
i dunnoe, nvr driven a car beforeOriginally posted by AE86tofu:so if thats the case how does this car stack up to its predecessor? the swift GTI?![]()
some mags say that for driving the GTI is better as its more raw
swift gti sucks lah!!Originally posted by AE86tofu:so if thats the case how does this car stack up to its predecessor? the swift GTI?![]()
some mags say that for driving the GTI is better as its more raw
Upgrades? Hmm..... Forged piston and harder valve springs...sounds like strong enough to withstand turbocharging forces... Anyone recommend installing a small turbo to give it more boost?Originally posted by bmx_rider:forged piston and harder valve spring makes it tough to handle high revs..and possible to achive higher power if add on few more upgrades...
Same class why cannot compare?Originally posted by so_nice:compare apple to apple. not durian vs apple. for a turbo charged car, colt version R isn't really tat fantastic.
i would vote for the swift sport as the market's current best bang for bucks car. like its cousin ignis sport.
NOT recommended to turbocharge swift sports.Originally posted by Scania N113CRB luver:Upgrades? Hmm..... Forged piston and harder valve springs...sounds like strong enough to withstand turbocharging forces... Anyone recommend installing a small turbo to give it more boost?
Ya, at 11.1:1!Originally posted by ecac:NOT recommended to turbocharge swift sports.
the Compression Ratio so bloodly high. even higher then Lancer Turbo GDI...
FYI the cultus GTI back in 1992 already achieved that featOriginally posted by Scania N113CRB luver:Ya, at 11.1:1!![]()
honestly CVR isnt that fantastic when it comes to handling....saw it at sepang and it lost to a car with bridgestone turanzas...and that car is alot heavier and 0-100 in 8 secsOriginally posted by ecac:Same class why cannot compare?
sss 1.6 cvr 1.5
sss ...125bhp 148Nm of torque 0-100 8.9
cvr ...154bhp 180Nm of torque 0-100 8
Price 1-2k diff
and abt whether CVR izzit fantastic?
CVR(manual) 0-100 6.5
WRX(manual 0-100 6
oh btw the manual version running on 210Nm
The subaru s204 is a 2l monster which can do it in 4.6s.Originally posted by ValiumZ:think WRX 0-100 is less than 6 seconds if aint wrong.....thats for stock!![]()
colt version R is ard 60k plus too?Originally posted by ecac:with that current price... might as well get a colt version r.
Launch period 65488 but theres a discount of 4k.Originally posted by mujiland:colt version R is ard 60k plus too?