Wrong. A manual Colt Version R has higher FC then the CVT version.Originally posted by Ah Cek:i think it applies to all car. all auto cars hv higher FC than manual car.
notedOriginally posted by ecac:Wrong. A manual Colt Version R has higher FC then the CVT version.
CVT version can maintain 1900RPM at 100KM/H
Manual abt 2500 at 100KM/H
Originally posted by ecac:Wrong. A manual Colt Version R has higher FC then the CVT version.
CVT version can maintain 1900RPM at 100KM/H
Manual abt 2500 at 100KM/H
You are the one who's wrong I think? Haha..they are talking about the Lancer here..so why are you talking about the Colt? LOL..Originally posted by ecac:Wrong. A manual Colt Version R has higher FC then the CVT version.
CVT version can maintain 1900RPM at 100KM/H
Manual abt 2500 at 100KM/H
haha. still mitsubishi la.Originally posted by alleggerita:You are the one who's wrong I think? Haha..they are talking about the Lancer here..so why are you talking about the Colt? LOL..![]()
ya, age of car, driving habits, road conditions (rural/urban), etc all play a partOriginally posted by Troy437:My Bro-in-law drives a manaul Lancer while I drive an auto. His is 8 months old and mine is 2 months old.
His FC is 12 km per litre, mine is 10 km per litre. But for my car there is quite a bit of waiting time for ppl while engine is idling, and its air con on all e way when driving from 11 to 8 pm.
NO you are the one having comprehension problem....Originally posted by alleggerita:You are the one who's wrong I think? Haha..they are talking about the Lancer here..so why are you talking about the Colt? LOL..![]()
i tot all manuals have higher rpm at 100km/h vs autos? so all autos have better fc?Originally posted by ecac:Wrong. A manual Colt Version R has higher FC then the CVT version.
CVT version can maintain 1900RPM at 100KM/H
Manual abt 2500 at 100KM/H
That depends... lower RPM does not necessarily means lower FC... cuz auto or CVT cars inherently suffer from more transmission losses compared to manuals.Originally posted by ecac:Wrong. A manual Colt Version R has higher FC then the CVT version.
CVT version can maintain 1900RPM at 100KM/H
Manual abt 2500 at 100KM/H
Wrong. A manual lancer has higher FC then the CVT version.Originally posted by crimson soldier:The fc for auto lancer is way higher than manual lancer?
u r right. CVT engine is not meant for pple who wans power.Originally posted by snorezzz:CVT engine suks man, no power one..
ppl who drive b4 the old lancer (98' model) will notice the diff from the new one![]()
Originally posted by n0x:CVT gear factor is lower at 1 speed. as compare to manual.
pls dun blind lead the blind pls... cvt describes the type of transmission... not the engine...
and [b]cvt doesnt mean no power... pls go read up more b4 making any comments based on ur individual warp judgement[/b]
i dun understand ur english.....Originally posted by Mitsubishi hater:CVT gear factor is lower at 1 speed. as compare to manual.