u comparing sohc vtec civic vti or dohc vtec vti?Originally posted by Doom:Hi all.....i am thinking of getting a car...either a honda civic VTI or a mivec...just wondering anyone got any advice on which car is better?? In terms of performance..fuel consumption etc..etc..??
If the comparison is between the DOHC Vtec??..And also....anyone here that owns a MIVEC..maybe can advise me on the fuel consumption of a MIVEC..i.e. how many kilometers per litre of Petrol..and how abt the price range of a MIVEC that is around 3 Yrs old...( in the region of 98-99 ) thks!!Originally posted by widowmaker:u comparing sohc vtec civic vti or dohc vtec vti?
heh dohc vtec civic vti is a lot betta den lancer mivec. be it performance, handling, modify potential... not sure bout fuel consumption though. con is, the price, the car condition, and the bad reputation with TPOriginally posted by Doom:If the comparison is between the DOHC Vtec??..And also....anyone here that owns a MIVEC..maybe can advise me on the fuel consumption of a MIVEC..i.e. how many kilometers per litre of Petrol..and how abt the price range of a MIVEC that is around 3 Yrs old...( in the region of 98-99 ) thks!!
You are right..i am currently looking for a manual one..black to be exact..i also find that the car is fierce looking as compared to the new ones..but the problem is..the price is too steep...anyone got lobang for this car??Originally posted by Ah Wei:Hi Doom,
A DOHC Vti is defintely better than the mivec, but not sure abt the SOHC Vti though. But by far, Honda is definitely a better car than Mitsubishi in general.
A mid-99 Lancer will cost u abt 70k in the current 2nd hand car market. Of cos, think this price can be cut by a further few thousands.
Nevertheless, these 2 cars look great, with some slight mod here and there. If you are going for a mivec, try to go for a manual one.
Hi Shadow,Originally posted by SHADOWSKILL:sorry guys correct me if i m wrong. i m a noob. but i think tat mivec lancers don't come in manual, the closest u get to manual is tiptronic.![]()
your point of shit!u absolutely know nothing!a mivec owner will be very happy if his car have 130bhp...talk about 175bhp..fierce??but they still smell my smoke!Originally posted by jp_sean:hi there... from my point of view, i tink tt e mivec is better. it has 175BHP n accelerates to 100km in abt 9s. which is almost e faster den the BMW 320i. the manual version would be ideal. n some mod like changing 2 OZ rims. e car would be damn fierce. er.. i was tinkin, the evo7 is quite fierce too. maybe u interested?$155k(new)
den how much BHP does it have?!Originally posted by FroggieVS:your point of shit!u absolutely know nothing!a mivec owner will be very happy if his car have 130bhp...talk about 175bhp..fierce??but they still smell my smoke!
try mr froggie!!!!!scare dont play play dont scare!!
if a normal lancer has already 116BHP, y doesnt e mivec has 175BHP. e evo has 280BHP if u sae i wrong u go find mitsubishi la! wan correct sommore?!Originally posted by FroggieVS:your point of shit!u absolutely know nothing!a mivec owner will be very happy if his car have 130bhp...talk about 175bhp..fierce??but they still smell my smoke!
try mr froggie!!!!!scare dont play play dont scare!!
wah...i never knew the evos have twin turbo...Originally posted by ultrapak:mivec engine is tuned to that horse power while normal lancer
has standard out put of 116 while evo have twin turbo charger
to pushes the horsepower to 280bhp.Turbo charger work by
spinning at more than 13000 rpm to bring in fresh air into the combustion chamber as more air is present more fuel can
enter and combust thus deliver more hp from every pistons
to say it increase the air fuel mixture..
i think what that froggie said also true, heard and read from others that the output didn't really match the 175bhp the factory claims to be.Originally posted by jp_sean:if a normal lancer has already 116BHP, y doesnt e mivec has 175BHP. e evo has 280BHP if u sae i wrong u go find mitsubishi la! wan correct sommore?!