Hmmm.... Anyone else sees a problem with the whole system here? The people who decides who is in the right and wrong weren't even present when the accident happened.
Your insurance company can easily accept 30 to 40% liability, and then remove your NCB the following year. Beneficial to them if the amount claimed is small no?

I was involved in a little accident more than a year ago on the highway. Traffic stopped, so did I and another car hit me from behind and my car moved forward a little and bumped the car infront of me. The guy infront had a brand new car so understandably he wasn't too happy with the little scratch on his rear bumper.
We all made our individual claims (and luckily the guy behind me admitted full responsibility). I thought everything was settled. When I tried to renew my insurance 2 months ago, I found out that my insurance company stripped away my NCB because of that accident. Seems that the insurance company of the guy infront of me, and my insurance company has still not decided if my insurance should pay, or the guy behind me should pay for the front guy's bumper.

Just a tiny scratch, if my company wants to pay the full $100 or so to touch up the little paint work... my premiums rise by 50% !!!!
There has to be a better way than this. The party who has the most to gain (i.e. insurance companies) can not be the ones who decides on who pays what!