Signalling
-
do u guys signal when u r on a left/right turn oni lane? is there a need to signal in such cases? i always do, but see a lot of other cars queueing up not doing dat....
-
Changing Lane without Signalling = $70 summon
BEtter signal to be safe, is better to take the extra step to depress or lift ur signal handle then reaching into ur pocket to take out the $$$ to pay the fine!
-
i posed this question to my driving instructor once and he said 'yes' but i also see a lot of cars especially taxis not signalling leh. i mean these lanes are strictly for left/right turns so why must be signal?Originally posted by speedygonzales:do u guys signal when u r on a left/right turn oni lane? is there a need to signal in such cases? i always do, but see a lot of other cars queueing up not doing dat.... -
$70 summon for not signalling? Where do you get that from???...
-
for those who din see the arrow on the laneOriginally posted by Newdriver:i posed this question to my driving instructor once and he said 'yes' but i also see a lot of cars especially taxis not signalling leh. i mean these lanes are strictly for left/right turns so why must be signal? -
yep... tis is sometink new to me too.... if its true, i'll signal no matter wat....Originally posted by rumie:$70 summon for not signalling? Where do you get that from???... $70 can get me 1 full tank of petrol nowadays... -
Heh actually i heard of this rule from a manager of mine ... he kena actually for speeding ... original fine was 120 and 3 points .. but after some beggin and stuff the officer summoned him 70 for changing lanes without signal .. and i saw the summon ticket i was like what the hellOriginally posted by rumie:$70 summon for not signalling? Where do you get that from???... -
i dun think signalling is needed for turnning lane ...
sometime there may be 2 turning right lane
and if u re on the outer side u signal pples may tought u wan to cut into the inner lane so it cause some misunderstanding
singal is for changing lane, n for those lane dat hve go straight / go right arrow so as to alert the car behind u intend to turn instead of going straight
if u re oredi inside the turning lane i see no pt in signalling.... -
I personally think it's better to signal... when u wanna turn right from a big junction, u think u're in the turn right lane so no need to signal, the cars coming from opposite cannot see if u r in the turning lane esp. at night, all he can see are headlights all over the place. If he knows u are turning at least he can be prepared in case u dash across without checking properly, same thing for the pedestrians crossing the road, at least they know this car is turning.
Signalling is better irregardless of lane i feel, when u wan to turn u should signal. Dun let other people guess....not every guy checks the arrow on the floor...
U think i thought who confirm.. ASSUME.. makes a ASS out of U and ME -
Staying at a lane with either left or right lane,i think is up to individual whether they want to turn the signal on.To me, i dun on the signal cos i find
the "tick tick" sound irritating.
For lane that can either go straight and turn,i think its better to signal to warn the vehicles behind.To me, i only turn the signal on when there is vehicle behind cos i really hate the sound man... -
Din know that like that oso fine 70 bucks...Originally posted by johncooper:Changing Lane without Signalling = $70 summon
BEtter signal to be safe, is better to take the extra step to depress or lift ur signal handle then reaching into ur pocket to take out the $$$ to pay the fine!
tink next time better signal.. -
Signalling is not only for the cars behind you but also the cars and pedestrains in front of you.
That's why you need to signal even though you are in a "turn only" lane. -
For me,i signal when i see the need...like pedestrain infront,vehicle behind..etcOriginally posted by Rafalution:Signalling is not only for the cars behind you but also the cars and pedestrains in front of you.
That's why you need to signal even though you are in a "turn only" lane.