Yep just their way of saying - some one we are directors but did not know what they are directing , some poor guy took the blame for us - we quickly closed shop, left the poor guy to die ... then we open operations but new name what !!!Originally posted by av98m:someone explain this to me:
Go and Sing were directors of gamesmart but they had nothing to do with its criminal activities?
Wasn't that Richard Yong's defence in the NKF trial? He didn't know what was going on and signed everything Durai pushed at him?
Is VOD free? Didn't the website mention $2 per episode and last for 7 days?Originally posted by duotiga83:Edited (fast forward)...
Looking ahead, Odex, which will launch a video-on-demand website today, is aiming for a "free and legal alternative" for fans by broadcasting anime on free-to-air television. Recently, Singapore became the first country outside Japan to broadcast D.Gray-Man, said Odex managing director Peter Go, with more titles under negotiation.
http://www.todayonline.com/articles/208537.asp
*tries to think of risque connotations about racing cars and trees*Originally posted by stellazio:LJ, what about that one about the car racing?![]()
Originally posted by fudgester:*tries to think of risque connotations about racing cars and trees*
Uhhh..... woah....![]()
well at least it have make a fool out of our friend at odex and give them a hard time , also reduce their ill gotten money.Originally posted by ryangian:If the jap anime studios were to go to the courts, then the judge will have no choice but to give the court orders to pacnet to release the data to XEDO....
Lets see what will happened now![]()
![]()
Kewl. Obviously NKF didn't teach them.Originally posted by storywolf:Yep just their way of saying - some one we are directors but did not know what they are directing , some poor guy took the blame for us - we quickly closed shop, left the poor guy to die ... then we open operations but new name what !!!
Again we directing = do not know what we directing ...
Very good way to earn money, that's the most important issue. You can't force them to buy, tweak your marketing tricks a bit and tada! Money starts rolling in.Originally posted by av98m:Here's another question:
What kind of idiot pays for VOD that takes a while to download, is not of very good quality, and yet cannot be viewed after 7 days.
At least when I pay to watch a movie, I get the big screen and big speakers/surround sound.
And when I buy a pay-per-view on cable, I can record the show for future viewing.
Say I watch an anime like Bleach on VOD, I end up paying $1 or $2 x ..what, 200 episodes? And I cannot watch it again unless I pay somemore.
*scratches head*
Under the Japanese legal system, anything that has been broadcasted free-to-air, may be duplicated for non-profit means under certain conditions.Originally posted by Bimborock:Their principle may express support for them. However, if Odex do not have exclusive right. They can not proceed. The Japan companies can come down and files application themself.
To grant Odex exclusive in this situation, especially when they suffered bad publicity, where the potential boycott of they products is possible across SEA. I do not see any reasonale behine except one; The Japan companies attempt to use SG LAW to set a benchmark for further application elsewhere hence SG enjoy good publicity on LAW in SEA. They willing to forego the SG market for wider pies. Another word, Odex just a tool they use, surely will get abandon later by them.
Gonna see how the court handle this time.
The trouble is that Singnet as symbol of SG have not even contested the applications but by consent may send them wrong signal. If the court grant them the order this time, it's gonna go through this process over and over again. The end is, they will get 80% of BB user details at their disposal. Not forgeting beside the usual 3K-5K. There is also damage claim up to 20K on each dowloader. Good profits for them I say.
Originally posted by LazerLordz:Good point here, and if it is truth, those 2 (Sing and Go) are just small pawns in the entire game of chess that is being played by the hands of the japanese.
Under the Japanese legal system, anything that has been broadcasted free-to-air, may be duplicated for non-profit means under certain conditions.
Perhaps they think it is easier to seek a judgement in Singapore, sacrifice (like you said) the local anime market, which is but a small splash in a big pond, use this victory in Singapore as a [b]defining legal precedence to lobby for amendments to Japan's Copyright Law so that they may enforce their case back home or in the United States much more effectively.
I can say that it is possible that our Govt's attempt to heighten our profile as a place where intellectual property is respected, has unwittingly made us into a tool to be used by the Japanese studios for enforcement activity in other countries, and that building an anime scene is the second thing on their priority, not the top one.
Perhaps they feel that the relative cost of alienating the current crowd is affordable given that we don't have a strong Singaporean fan-subbing scene and that there is little to no Singaporean otaku-driven fan-sub editions of Japanese animation in the SEA region. [/b]
It would be interesting to note if under the Singapore-Japan Free Trade Agreement, there is any component dealing with copyrights and intellectual property and how us and them will enforce in either nation..Originally posted by ryangian:Good point here, and if it is truth, those 2 (Sing and Go) are just small pawns in the entire game of chess that is being played by the hands of the japanese.
Google liao, but don have much leh.Originally posted by LazerLordz:It would be interesting to note if under the Singapore-Japan Free Trade Agreement, there is any component dealing with copyrights and intellectual property and how us and them will enforce in either nation..
Originally posted by LazerLordz:I'm not sure about this, but somehow I have a distinct feeling that the Japanese companies wouldn't dare to antagonise the bulk of the anime fans in Japan with such legislation. Also, as it is, they make tonnes of money from selling figurines and stuff at conventions which are hugely popular in Japan. I am also unsure how well the Japanese anime DVDs sell in Japan either. Given how high tech most Japanese households are, it isn't too much a stretch to imagine that they would be able to record the shows as they are aired in Japan. Trying to penalise those who record the videos down will to also antagonising the companies who sell the players as well. (Note that I do not put it past them to shit on about even their own fans.)
Under the Japanese legal system, anything that has been broadcasted free-to-air, may be duplicated for non-profit means under certain conditions.
Perhaps they think it is easier to seek a judgement in Singapore, sacrifice (like you said) the local anime market, which is but a small splash in a big pond, use this victory in Singapore as a [b]defining legal precedence to lobby for amendments to Japan's Copyright Law so that they may enforce their case back home or in the United States much more effectively.
I can say that it is possible that our Govt's attempt to heighten our profile as a place where intellectual property is respected, has unwittingly made us into a tool to be used by the Japanese studios for enforcement activity in other countries, and that building an anime scene is the second thing on their priority, not the top one.
Perhaps they feel that the relative cost of alienating the current crowd is affordable given that we don't have a strong Singaporean fan-subbing scene and that there is little to no Singaporean otaku-driven fan-sub editions of Japanese animation in the SEA region. [/b]
its two separate sentences. 1) they are launching a VOD website. 2) they are going to broadcast the anime for pple to watch for free on free-to-air tv (channels 5, 8, suria, central, CNA)Originally posted by furb:Is VOD free? Didn't the website mention $2 per episode and last for 7 days?
If 1 episode for $2 for 7 days, I might as well rent the series from my nearby video retailer for $6 per box and then burn it. That's more worth it isn't it since I can watch unlimited times?
That is if I were to rent it
Edited: Sorry, made a mistake, its $2 per episode for 7 days. I think my method is more worth it liao.
![]()
Extortion (Penal Code, Cap 224, Sec 383)
Whoever intentionally puts any person in fear of any injury* to that person or to any other, and thereby dishonestly induces the person so put in fear to deliver to any person any property or valuable security, or anything signed or sealed which may be converted into a valuable security, commits “extortion”.
Illustrations
(a) ODEX threatens to publish a defamatory libel concerning DOWNLOADER, unless DOWNLOADER gives him (ODEX) money. He thus induces DOWNLOADER to give him money. ODEX has committed "extortion".
Simpler terms: Since Odex has no rights is sueing people, Odex is now unlawfully threatening people for money.
*injury = injury to mind, body, reputation or property
And Extortion is a seizable offence i.e. can be arrested without a warrant
I haven use their VOD yet. But i heard its of high quality.Originally posted by av98m:Here's another question:
What kind of idiot pays for VOD that takes a while to download, is not of very good quality, and yet cannot be viewed after 7 days.
At least when I pay to watch a movie, I get the big screen and big speakers/surround sound.
And when I buy a pay-per-view on cable, I can record the show for future viewing.
Say I watch an anime like Bleach on VOD, I end up paying $1 or $2 x ..what, 200 episodes? And I cannot watch it again unless I pay somemore.
*scratches head*