beautiful indian women
-
Do you think that Indian girls are most beautiful women in the world?
Because most of the the miss world and miss universe prizes are come to India only.minimum they go to semi final. what do you say
-
no
-
no
-
northern indians..... that's what my guy friends say
-
Originally posted by Birla:
Do you think that Indian girls are most beautiful women in the world?
Because most of the the miss world and miss universe prizes are come to India only.minimum they go to semi final. what do you say
hi clone. what happened to your old nick?
-
Originally posted by Birla:
Do you think that Indian girls are most beautiful women in the world?
Because most of the the miss world and miss universe prizes are come to India only.minimum they go to semi final. what do you say
erm most of the "miss .." thing are evenly distributed across the globeindia is too big and the array of women presents much complexity in themselves
it will be easier to pinpoint the states from which the beauties hail
according to the western beauty viewpoint, women from Haryana Pradesh, Maharashtra, Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Chandigarh would suit their taste best
the reason for Maharashtra being listed even though it is separated by Rajasthan, Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh is because there is a substantial amount of northerners residing in Mumbai other than the native Marathis
in terms of Southern beauties, i think you will agree that the brown skinned Kanarese and Telagana are beautiful. they looked naturally tanned and exhibit both a northern and southern admixture in their looks
these are all modern concepts of beauty in the eyes of westerners
if we talk about regional beauties in the men's eyes, they would be found in every state in india, even in the eyes of the scheduled tribes has their own perception of "beauty" i would say
-
actually, thailand and the philippines got more ......
but hey .... it's a clone ! ...
-
i realli donno why you all guys so excited over clones
actually i already suspected birla and kaimar are clones way back when Birla first posted
i do not see they disrupt the forums at all
so why care about they are clones or not ?
-
the most famous of them Aishwarya Rai is south Indian. she comes from Mangalore
-
South Indian models will have a more asian face. They are hot too..sometimes hotter than the northern ones.
-
-
barbarian women look nicer then any indian
-
Originally posted by Bangulzai:
erm most of the "miss .." thing are evenly distributed across the globeindia is too big and the array of women presents much complexity in themselves
it will be easier to pinpoint the states from which the beauties hail
according to the western beauty viewpoint, women from Haryana Pradesh, Maharashtra, Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Chandigarh would suit their taste best
the reason for Maharashtra being listed even though it is separated by Rajasthan, Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh is because there is a substantial amount of northerners residing in Mumbai other than the native Marathis
in terms of Southern beauties, i think you will agree that the brown skinned Kanarese and Telagana are beautiful. they looked naturally tanned and exhibit both a northern and southern admixture in their looks
these are all modern concepts of beauty in the eyes of westerners
if we talk about regional beauties in the men's eyes, they would be found in every state in india, even in the eyes of the scheduled tribes has their own perception of "beauty" i would say
I think south indian look best too.
-
south indian in themselves is also too big a territory
the four big states that are considered Dravidian and South Indian are Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Kerala
the admixture of Northern and Southern Indians can be seen easily in Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka (as I have mentioned in my earlier post - the Telagana and the Kanarese). in itself, the language of Telugu and Kannada also has more Sanskrit elements deeply embedded within itself than Malayalam and Tamil
in Kerala, the Brahmins from the north whom settled down abt 800yrs ago contributed to a sub-class of fairer people in Kerala. you will find fair and very tanned people in Kerala itself
that's why when we say "look best", it is really really very subjective
-
check this topic:
she is a pure south indian tamil:
Trisha krishnan
-
Originally posted by Birla:
check this topic:
she is a pure south indian tamil:
Trisha krishnan
thanks.
i know Trisha Krishnan is beautiful
anyway just to give an opinion on the use of the word "pure"
in the strictest anthropological sense there is no such thing as "pure" hahaha
especially when you are talking about Indians
if you take time to read some anthropological articles you will find that northern and southern indians no doubt look very different across the subcontinent, there are not much difference in their genetic markers
that means that since the Indo-Harrapan era when the Indo-Aryan migrated and mixed with the supposedly local Elamite population there has been much intermixture already and we cannot easily demarcate a north and south indian biologically other than outwardly physical appearances
the only people india now with substantial non-Dravidian non-Aryan non-Australoid genetic markers are the Indo-Mongoloid people that appears in Baltistan all the way stretching till Tripura in the far-eastern extension of india
-
why would babarian looks nicer?
-
Originally posted by Birla:
Do you think that Indian girls are most beautiful women in the world?
Because most of the the miss world and miss universe prizes are come to India only.minimum they go to semi final. what do you say
OMGosh my school got one teacher who is indian keep asking people in our class you from what country -__-!!!
-
Originally posted by Bangulzai:
thanks.
i know Trisha Krishnan is beautiful
anyway just to give an opinion on the use of the word "pure"
in the strictest anthropological sense there is no such thing as "pure" hahaha
especially when you are talking about Indians
if you take time to read some anthropological articles you will find that northern and southern indians no doubt look very different across the subcontinent, there are not much difference in their genetic markers
that means that since the Indo-Harrapan era when the Indo-Aryan migrated and mixed with the supposedly local Elamite population there has been much intermixture already and we cannot easily demarcate a north and south indian biologically other than outwardly physical appearances
the only people india now with substantial non-Dravidian non-Aryan non-Australoid genetic markers are the Indo-Mongoloid people that appears in Baltistan all the way stretching till Tripura in the far-eastern extension of india
who cares, so long they ease my eyes.
-
not so