which one lousier? 2.5" or 3.5"?

• yuko-ogura

  14 Aug 07, 18:37

  which size is lousier for external hard disk?
  in terms of capabilities and functions etc.
• mr_sotong

  14 Aug 07, 19:18

  3.5.. need a power adapter to work..
• ndmmxiaomayi

  14 Aug 07, 19:24

  Functionality wise, they work the same. Power wise, 3.5" needs extra power. And not to mention, it's bulky.
• Farmerseed

  14 Aug 07, 19:57

  The person who don't know how to make full use of either a 2.5" or a 3.5" is the lousiest.
  
  I think the thread title should be praised as "the pros and cons of a 2.5"/ 3.5".
• Rockhound

  14 Aug 07, 20:28

  1.8 dey if u particular abt size....
  
  
• caleb_chiang

  14 Aug 07, 20:31

  all hardisks same function... unless you are talking about special casing...
  
  
• Farmerseed

  14 Aug 07, 20:36

  Originally posted by Rockhound:

  1.8 dey if u particular abt size....
  
  

  Iif only microdrives can hit the capacity of a standard 3.5" and affordable at the same time, versatile too.
• kenn3th

  14 Aug 07, 22:08

  2.5 ftw