:( StarHub is capping intl websites to 10-15KB/sec
-
StarHub are capping international websites down to a measly to 10-15KB/sec which is barely 2 to 3 times faster than a dial up modem connection
On a 1.5Mbps plan you should be getting ~150KB/sec(>10 times faster than current speed), 6Mbps should be getting ~600KB/sec, 12Mbps should be getting ~1200KB/sec, and 100Mbps should be getting ~10,000KB/sec. Read about about it here:
StarHub is capping intl websites to 10-15KB/sec
Its important that you post within that thread instead of here as StarHub would not be monitoring this third party forum.
Spread the word. Post that link to other forums and threads, blogs, emails, irc, etc. Substandard web speeds has got to stop. -
o.o!!! SongNet is capping intl websites to 0.8-1.6 bits/sec. It takes forever just to send HTTP headers to any server!
SongNet capping intl websites to 0.8-1.6 bits/sec
Its important that you post within here instead of here as SongNet would not be monitoring this third party forum.
Spread the word. Post that link to other forums and threads, emails, irc, etc. Substandard web speeds has got to stop.
z.
Can someone / some ant please lock this thread and tie the TS up onto a human-sized cactus? -
best limit dwn to 8kb.
-
Its good to see some customers enjoy paying top dollar to access International websites at ISDN speeds.
LatecomerX: StarHub have just released the Internet plan for you... Its called The Infinity Plan. Why pay $59.92, $81.32, or $124.12 a month when you can purchase two The Infinity Plans for only $16.05 per month each and then combine them using load balancing and you will be able to surf International websites at the speed you do now. Think of all the money you would save.
LyonK: Be sure to post your speed report at the StarHub forum. The direct link for registering there is:
Register -
I guess you're left-brained. Can you please be in your right mind before you type?
Why the heck would StarHub cap download speed to such a low limit? Did Odex just applied for a new court order or something?
From coolgeek84:
-
LatecomerX: If you read my analysis of the 1st half of my test results:Originally posted by LatecomerX:I guess you're left-brained. Can you please be in your right mind before you type?
Why the heck would StarHub cap download speed to such a low limit? Did Odex just applied for a new court order or something?
From coolgeek84:
StarHub is capping intl websites to 10-15KB/sec`()cpZ!'s server
You would have realised that web traffic(port 80) within SG is not speed capped. From your own screenshot you pasted you chose a server within SG. I'm sure you can see the folly in that.
:80
30.12KB/s RaTsYc|-
:27080
30.12KB/s RaTsYc|-
Here RaTsYc|- who uses StarHub downloaded two differently named 1MB files from `()cpZ!'s server. From the results we can see that within Singapore HTTP(port 80) traffic shaping is NOT occuring.
Please visit http://www.speedtest.net/index.php again and chose a server outside of SG. Please pick one in either US or AU. After doing so please take another screenshot and post your results here for all to see.
After doing that.... I am sure it would be possible to add sites to the traffic shaper exempt list and it might be possible that speedtest.net is added to the exempt list. Can you please repeat the testing procedure we used? Its quite simple...
0. Download WGET from here:
WGET for Windows
1. Extract the zip file to C:\wget
2. Start up a Command Prompt. Start | Run | cmd | OK
3. Type in this and press enter afterwards:
cd \wget
4. Type in this and press enter afterwards:
wget http://anapnea.net/~benlee/1MB.anapnea.LatecomerX.file.zip
5. When that finishes copy and paste the last line into here. It will look similar to this:
09:52:45 (120.40KB/s KB/s) - `1MB.anapnea.LatecomerX.file.zip' saved [1048576/1048576]
6. Type in this and press enter afterwards:
wget http://www.blacksburgpower.com/~benlee/1MB.blacksburgpower.LatecomerX.file.zip
7. When that finishes copy and paste the last line into here. It will look similar to this:
10:03:20 (175.20KB/s KB/s) - `1MB.blacksburgpower.LatecomerX.file.zip.2' saved [10485
76/1048576]
Those speeds I pasted to anapnea and blacksburgpower is what `()cpZ! who uses SingNet achieved. They aren't really big servers and their speeds can vary during the day.
Both test files are only 1 MB each and were freshly created using:
dd if=/dev/urandom of=./1MB..LatecomerX.file.zip bs=1024k count=1
Once you have your results please come back here and paste them. Also paste what speed you are on.
If your results match ours(10-15KB/sec) you will clearly see that StarHub is capping international websites. To answer your question, if it was Odex all protocols and ports both local in SG and international would be speed capped :p As to "Why the heck would StarHub cap download speed to such a low limit?" I answered that in my original post:
StarHub is capping intl websites to 10-15KB/secThis would suggest that StarHub is maxing out their international bandwidth and have put this in as a band-aid solution instead of upgrading their backend haul bandwidth.
Also read the article I linked to within that post:
Gamers upset about StarHub's sluggish broadband speeds
Again if your results match ours(10-15KB/sec), then your responses have been wrongfully quite hostile. No need to shoot the messenger. Go and unleash your anger where it rightfully belongs, on your ISP StarHub, in their official forum. Take the time to register at their forum and tell them in that thread I started that your not happy. After that tell people you know who uses StarHub to go and post there also.
You might ask why bother posting there? Simple StarHub believes that complaints about their service are "few and far between" and also they believe that "we do not agree our connection is slower", posting provides a rebuttal to both of those beliefs.
I'm looking forward to your results. -
I don't see the need to spam across so many boards. Since you are posting, I assume that you are a Starhub user. Why don't you post your results instead?
-
http://www.speedtest.net/result/183105483.png
i tried aus
i starhub
and this is sg de , i tried
http://www.speedtest.net/result/183105715.png -
-
i just dled something form yahoo for the sake of it.
690+kbps.
you talking about upload or download ?
-
If your results match ours(10-15KB/sec) you will clearly see that StarHub is capping international websites
OK, this statement is misleading enough. There are a lot of international servers, why should these 2 servers be the basis of your test? -
Simply because certain websites are exempt from StarHub's traffic shaping policies. They even state this on their own website:Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:OK, this statement is misleading enough. There are a lot of international servers, why should these 2 servers be the basis of your test?
MaxOnlineSpeed boost at partner sites
I could not find their list of partner sites. So if your testing to a so called partner website you will receive the full speed. .Try surfing to a website outsite their list and you will be surfing at the crippling speed of 10-15KB/s. Try with some other smaller servers around. I'm sure you will find similar results. BTW `()cpZ! who uses SingNet got a speed of 120.40KB/s to anapnea and a speed of 175.20KB/s to blacksburgpower.[/b]
If you're on MaxOnline Express or MaxOnline Premium, you can still experience 100Mbps, as you get a free speed boost at wide selection of websites. All you need is a 100Mbps-ready (DOCSIS 3.0) cable modem. With your existing cable modem, speed can still be boosted up to 32Mbps as no one's left behind. -
Didn't see the difference/ cap in my Maxonline
I get over 400KB/s with Flashget on decent international servers. -
Sagara I am talking about download. BTW yahoo would certainly be on their traffic shaped exempt list. See my post above. So please try to find some other websites which would fall outside of StarNet's partner site net.Originally posted by Sagara:i just dled something form yahoo for the sake of it.
690+kbps.
you talking about upload or download ? -
But this doesn't prove that Starhub is capping international websites download speeds to 10-15kbps.
Also, you are talking about servers. How much bandwidth is allocated to them? What's the server specs? How many people are accessing the server at any one time?
These factors can cripple a fast server. Castlecops, a well-established security website, has a huge server, great bandwidth. But yet they are slow. Why? As a security website, they are a target of attack. This can greatly reduce bandwidth. Tens of thousands can be accessing Castlecops at any one time.
Even without considering any attacks on Castlecops, it does take some time to reach Castlecops and download stuffs from there due to the workload. -
Just need to ask you this.Originally posted by johnnygamer:Sagara I am talking about download. BTW yahoo would certainly be on their traffic shaped exempt list. See my post above. So please try to find some other websites which would fall outside of StarNet's partner site net.
How about p2p or torrent networks?
Do you think conducting experiment with these networks is fair test?
Coz I have been getting 300KB and up on some, and I certainly don't think Starhub partners them -
P2P is a different kind of technology, so I don't think it will be a good comparison. Most home computers will never get to the stage of being a dedicated server, unlike servers that are purposely build for that.
Besides, P2P means connecting directly to someone else, while connecting through a website is not. Singapore internet connections prohibit us from directing connecting to a server. Everything is going through a national proxy. -
I'm quite well aware of those nuances. The anapnea is hosted on a 100Mbps/100Mbps connection. I'm waiting to hear back from the blacksburgpower admin what bandwidth he has allocated to it. However my testing methodology bypasses nuances like the ones you have suggested above. When the person on StarHub downloaded a 1MB file on port 80 he only got 10-15KB/sec. When he downloaded a different 1MB file FROM THE SAME SERVER straight after that one had finished ON A DIFFERENT PORT he got 78.77KB/s. This was clearly explained in the results section of the original thread. This is clearly proof that StarHub are traffic shaping international web traffic that falls outside of their partner net to the crippling speed of 10-15KB/sec. This was clearly explained in English in the original thread IF you took the time to read the whole thread in its entirety and took the time to understand what was being said.Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:But this doesn't prove that Starhub is capping international websites download speeds to 10-15kbps.
Also, you are talking about servers. How much bandwidth is allocated to them? What's the server specs? How many people are accessing the server at any one time?
These factors can cripple a fast server. Castlecops, a well-established security website, has a huge server, great bandwidth. But yet they are slow. Why? As a security website, they are a target of attack. This can greatly reduce bandwidth. Tens of thousands can be accessing Castlecops at any one time.
Even without considering any attacks on Castlecops, it does take some time to reach Castlecops and download stuffs from there due to the workload.
During the time of testing, one person on StarHub, the other on SingNet, they both downloaded from the same servers pretty close in time to one another. While the person on SingNet got variable speeds for different runs, the person on StarHub got consistent speeds of 10-15KB/s.
My results are quite easy to verify for youself. Find yourself one friend overseas who has a home broadband connection with an upload speed greater than 10-15KB/s. Get them to setup SHTTPD on both port 80 and some other random port. Get them to put 2 different test files into the SHTTPD directory. Download one file using port 80, download the second file using some other port. Record and post your results here.
In regards to p2p and torrents, that would not be a fair comparision for two reasons, one, not all of them connect on port 80(in my original post I stated that web traffic[port 80] is being speed limited), two, p2p and torrents normally have multiple connections to different people for the same file so the transfer speed you are seeing is an aggregate of those individual streams. -
I don't see how you can bypass those nuisances I've mentioned.
1. Hardware.
2. Bandwidth.
3. Number of people connecting at any one time.
Till we get all variables to be the same, the test will never be a fair one.
In the meantime, here's my results:
16:42:21 (116.04 KB/s) - `1MB.anapnea.LatecomerX.file.zip' saved [1048576/1048576]
16:43:07 (105.58 KB/s) - `1MB.blacksburgpower.LatecomerX.file.zip' saved [1048576/1048576] -
Before you start to trust the TS,
First, We Must Check How Reliable The Source In The First Place, As The Ts Created The Source HimSelf, Using The Nick "johnnygame", and posting "quotes" and "evidence" that the speed is capped @ this rate.
Nxt, As A Starhub user, I Dont Find That My Internet Connection Is Slow @ All, I Tested Downloading a 1mb file and it's rate is @ 665kb/sec on a MaxOnline Premium connection.
Nxt, Starhub Forum Moderators Have Not Verified That What The Ts had said, or had any action to it. -
To Ts: Why Dont I Feel Any Lag Or Slowness While Playing an MMORPG on an America, Uk, Netherlands Sever?
-
Are you on StarNet? Chances are someone has already downloaded those fles before you and now they are sitting inside a cache on the ISP/national proxy server(s). I have created two new fresh files just for you. To make sure no one else downloads them before you I will PM you the links. Please post your results here.Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:I don't see how you can bypass those nuisances I've mentioned.
1. Hardware.
2. Bandwidth.
3. Number of people connecting at any one time.
Till we get all variables to be the same, the test will never be a fair one.
In the meantime, here's my results:
16:42:21 (116.04 KB/s) - `1MB.anapnea.LatecomerX.file.zip' saved [1048576/1048576]
16:43:07 (105.58 KB/s) - `1MB.blacksburgpower.LatecomerX.file.zip' saved [1048576/1048576] -
Just shoot the PM and I will post.Originally posted by johnnygamer:Are you on StarNet? Chances are someone has already downloaded those fles before you and now they are sitting inside a cache on the ISP/national proxy server(s). I have created two new fresh files just for you. To make sure no one else downloads them before you I will PM you the links. Please post your results here. -
I doubt anybody is trusting him yet. In the meantime, let's do some tests to prove or disprove his theory.Originally posted by kenn3th:Before you start to trust the TS,
First, We Must Check How Reliable The Source In The First Place, As The Ts Created The Source HimSelf, Using The Nick "johnnygame", and posting "quotes" and "evidence" that the speed is capped @ this rate.
Nxt, As A Starhub user, I Dont Find That My Internet Connection Is Slow @ All, I Tested Downloading a 1mb file and it's rate is @ 665kb/sec on a MaxOnline Premium connection.
Nxt, Starhub Forum Moderators Have Not Verified That What The Ts had said, or had any action to it. -
Results:
1st file: 17:15:41 (79.07 KB/s) - `1MB...80.ndmmxiaomayi.file.zip' saved [1048576/1048576]
2nd file: 17:16:14 (57.79 KB/s) - `1MB...27015.ndmmxiaomayi.file.zip' saved [1048576/1048576]
