1/2xOriginally posted by Y_Shun::O ans correct.
but differentiate ln2x is
1/2x or
(1/2x)(d/dx 2x) ????
no no...when differentiate its suppose to beOriginally posted by lpx88:1/2x
ln2x is only recognised as 1 single term.
when u differentiate ln2x the final ans will alr be 1/2x. i think no need to differentiate further..is that what ur tryin to ask?Originally posted by Y_Shun:no no...when differentiate its suppose to be
1/[2x] then you are oso supposed to differentiate the 2x, and.... maybe wait for someone to confirm
i asked another fren, his ans and mine correct...
err...no.Originally posted by lpx88:when u differentiate ln2x the final ans will alr be 1/2x. i think no need to differentiate further..is that what ur tryin to ask?
then in what case do we need to differentiate ax again?Originally posted by unclebutcher:differentiate ln(ax) = 1/ax
easy
Originally posted by unclebutcher:differentiate ln(ax) = 1/ax
easy
u sure?Originally posted by Y_Shun::O ans correct.
2/2x = 1/x -.-Originally posted by lpx88:1/2x
ln2x is only recognised as 1 single term.
sorryOriginally posted by Y_Shun:then in what case do we need to differentiate ax again?
x(1/x)+ln(2x) -0.5=Originally posted by Y_Shun:x ln 2x - 0.5x with respect to x
assessment book ans give ln2xOriginally posted by eagle:u sure?
I tink the publisher committed the same careless mistake as me.... take ln2x as 1/2x thats whyOriginally posted by Y_Shun:textbook ans give ln2x
but my ans is ln2x+0.5
okay...so did anyone of you worked for that assesment book publisher before?![]()
![]()
Trust yourself more sometimes.Originally posted by Y_Shun:assessment book ans give ln2x
but my ans is ln2x+0.5
okay...so did anyone of you worked for that assessment book publisher before?![]()
![]()