Depends if you monetarist or keynesian.
clap clap clap to 16/f/lonely
Originally posted by maurizio13:
Depends if you monetarist or keynesian.
Hanor....there's the Liquidity Preference I chose to explain....cos I suck from the conservative's point of view...
Originally posted by 16/f/lonely:I basically just listed all the factors of demand for $$.....use them wisely....lol
i can't use yur list
i need to draw out using IS-LM graphs
only Master-_- 's frequency nearer to mine lol
but i'm feeling ya too 16/f/lonely
to get rid of liquidity trap, u need to get rid of the deflationary gap..what i have learnt is by superinertial procedures but i dun think u have learn it before la
So the next best thing is via introducing a policy which induces a deflationary gap
wads deflationary??
i yr1 nia.. dun 'cheematize' me lol
Damn.
These questions in here are getting tougher and tougher.
I hope people won't start asking game theory questions soon. ![]()
Originally posted by charlize:Damn.
These questions in here are getting tougher and tougher.
I hope people won't start asking game theory questions soon.
Bertrand or Cournot Games? ![]()
Originally posted by maurizio13:
Bertrand or Cournot Games?
Do I look and sound like I know Nash equilibrium shit? ![]()
Originally posted by charlize:
Do I look and sound like I know Nash equilibrium shit?
Since you know what is Nash equilibria, most definitely you do. ![]()
Originally posted by maurizio13:
Since you know what is Nash equilibria, most definitely you do.
Damn, my cover is blown.
I better stick to corny one liners. ![]()
Originally posted by charlize:Damn, my cover is blown.
I better stick to corny one liners.
Ok.
Made a mental note.
If difficult question about game theory don't understand, ask charlize. ![]()