If President Trump were to order a nuclear strike on North Korea, hereâ€™s what would happen
â€¢Next month's Pyeongchang Winter Olympics maybe a reason for South Koreans to celebrate, but war concerns persist.
â€¢An ex-CIA official who just returned from Seoul says there are "very strong concerns" the U.S. could launch an attack on North Korea.
â€¢South Korean officials worry that even a limited strike, or a "preventive attack" could spark retaliation by Kim Jong Un.
â€¢A pre-emptive "bloody nose" US strike option also is said to be on the table, and cannot be ruled out.
Meet Fabio, a robot who was placed as a shopping assistant in the Scottish supermarket Margiotta. He was supposed to help customers find their items, as well as give price price information, and do other helpful things that supermarket employees do.
However, it turned out that he wasn't great at his job, according to reports. Not only could Fabio not adequately give customers the information they asked for, his programmed personality quirks ended up creeping people out.
He would apparently yell out "hello, gorgeous!" to customers in greeting, and give unwanted high fives and even ... hugs.
Boundaries, Fabio â€” heard of 'em?!
So unfortunately, when customers started actively avoiding Fabio, his Margiotta employers had to let the little guy go.
After nearly 13 years at Google, I have finally left the nest! Never thought it would happen. I always thought I would die at Googleâ€Šâ€”â€Šmaybe choking to death on one of their free chocolate brownies, or maybe finally having a heart attack over YouTubeâ€™s increasingly bizarre policy enforcement. But regardless of how I envisioned the Grim Reaper catching up with me, I always assumed heâ€™d be hauling me in surrounded by colorful furniture, free food and snacks, and slightly entitled geniuses.
It is difficult to pry people away from Google. Even after almost 20 years of operation, Google is still one of the very best places to work on Earth, just about any way you care to measure it.
I have a lot of good stories saved up that Iâ€™d love to share. Google corporate didnâ€™t much care for my blogging, and even though they never outright forbade it, I received a lot of indirect pressure from various VPs. So eventually I stopped. Sad.
But thatâ€™s not where my mindâ€™s at today. Those stories will have to wait for my book. Today I just want to tell you about my new gig, because I think youâ€™re going to be amazed. In fact I think I can safely predict that no matter who you are, something in this post is going to amaze you.
Before I tell you about the new gig, Iâ€™ll share a few brief observations about Google, to help paint a backdrop for why, of all the great companies out there, I chose to join Grab.
Why I left Google
The main reason I left Google is that they can no longer innovate. Theyâ€™ve pretty much lost that ability. I believe there are several contributing factors, of which Iâ€™ll list four here.
First, theyâ€™re conservative: They are so focused on protecting what theyâ€™ve got, that they fear risk-taking and real innovation. Gatekeeping and risk aversion at Google are the norm rather the exception.
Second, they are mired in politics, which is sort of inevitable with a large enough organization; the only real alternative is a dictatorship, which has its own downsides. Politics, as ex-Google SVP Bill Coughran once said, is the best solution humanity has come up with to this problem in the past 5000 years: the problem of resource contention. So itâ€™s not necessarily bad. But politics is a cumbersome process, and it slows you down and leads to execution problems.
Third, Google is arrogant. It has taken me years to understand that a company full of humble individuals can still be an arrogant company. Google has the arrogance of the â€œweâ€�, not the â€œIâ€�. When a company is as dramatically successful as Google has been, the organization can become afflicted with a sense of invincibility and almost manifest destiny, which leads to tragic outcomes: complacency, not-invented-here syndrome, loss of touch with customers, poor strategic decision-making. So I love the people at Google; theyâ€™re super smart and world class and always humble individuals, no matter how badass they are in their respective disciplines. But the company strategy is a mess.
I think this is obvious to anyone who has followed Googleâ€™s public launches over the past five or ten years. Google does all sorts of things these days that leave everyone scratching their heads: Picking unwinnable fights and then trying to force their product on us (e.g. Google+), launching products that are universally panned (e.g. Allo), deprecating and turning down well-loved services (e.g. Reader, Hangouts), launching official APIs with competing and incompatible frameworks (e.g. gRPC vs. REST), launching obviously competing stacks that donâ€™t talk to each other (e.g. Android native vs. Dart/Flutter), etc. Their attempts at innovation have been confusing and mostly unsuccessful for close to a decade. Googlers know this is happening and are as frustrated by it as you are, but their leadership is failing them.
But fourth, last, and probably worst of all, Google has become 100% competitor-focused rather than customer focused. Theyâ€™ve made a weak attempt to pivot from this, with their new internal slogan â€œFocus on the user and all else will follow.â€� But unfortunately itâ€™s just lip service. Itâ€™s not that they donâ€™t care. The problem is that their incentive structure isnâ€™t aligned for focusing on their customers, so they wind up being too busy and it always gets deprioritized. A slogan isnâ€™t good enough. It takes real effort to set aside time regularly for every employee to interact with your customers. Instead they play the dangerous but easier game of using competitor activity as a proxy for what customers really need. This is where their incentives are focused. Google incentivizes successful feature and product launches, and by far the easiest, safest way to produce those is by copying competitors.
You can look at Googleâ€™s entire portfolio of launches over the past decade, and trace nearly all of them to copying a competitor: Google+ (Facebook), Google Cloud (AWS), Google Home (Amazon Echo), Allo (WhatsApp), Android Instant Apps (Facebook, WeChat), Google Assistant (Apple/Siri), and on and on and on. They are stuck in me-too mode and have been for years. They simply donâ€™t have innovation in their DNA any more. And itâ€™s because their eyes are fixed on their competitors, not their customers.
To be fair, there are exceptions. Googleâ€™s Cloud Spanner, BigQuery, TensorFlow, Waymo and a few others are generational innovations and will take some time for the industry to catch up with. But they do not excuse nor justify the parade of failed me-too consumer products that Google has been launching of late.
In short, Google just isnâ€™t a very inspiring place to work anymore. I love being fired up by my work, but Google had gradually beaten it out of me.
And so, like many Googlers, Iâ€™d been thinking of moving on for a few years. But where would you go? It takes a lot to pry someone away from the best place to work on earth, since if nothing else, Google still has a pretty incredible work environment, especially for engineers.
The big name-brand tech companies are almost all operating in the Seattle area, but I think they mostly suffer from the same big-company problems. Facebook gets most of its â€œinnovationsâ€� from acquisitions these days (Instagram, WhatsApp, Oculus). And I also donâ€™t like what Iâ€™ve heard about their culture, from friends whoâ€™ve gone there.
Amazon continues to innovate a fair bit, but theyâ€™re also not above copying ideas from competitors and trying to squish the smaller ones and generally being big mean bullies. I am tempted to make fun of Jeff Bezos here, but Iâ€™ve heard that nobody has done that three times in a row and lived to tell the tale, so Iâ€™ll, ah, quit while Iâ€™m ahead. But I spent seven years at Amazon and this time around, I was aiming for something different. Oracle, Twitter, Apple, eBay, Microsoft, Adobe, SalesForce, and the other big brands here? They all seem kinda meh.
It seems like you can only really get inspiration from startups these days, so I nearly joined a few. But none seemed just right.
So there I was, scouring the landscape for some inspiration, when I got an email out of the blue from an old Google buddy of mine, Theo Vassilakis. Theo had read the tea leaves years ago and had left Google to do his own big-data startup Metanautix, which he successfully sold to Microsoft.
Theo was writing to let me know he had just become the CTO of Grab, a Singapore-based startup with an eng office here in Seattle.
And that, folks, is where our adventure begins.
Why I joined Grab
To my lasting surprise, I have gone to war.
There is no better way to put it. I feel like Iâ€™ve joined a literal revolutionary war, surrounded by and fighting alongside guerilla troops, and itâ€™s win or die.
I have not been this excited about something since maybe the early days of Grok, when I was working 12+ hour days on my mini-startup within Google to revolutionize the way developers interacted with a billion-line code base. But even that was only changing the world for devs. This is so much bigger.
If you look at the heat map of tech opportunities in the greater Seattle area, from the lukewarm (Niantic, OfferUp) to the warm (Facebook, Amazon) to the hot (SpaceX, small startups), then Grab is a huge green ball of flame just about blasting your face off.
Grab is the biggest startup in the history of Southeast Asia. Grab is fighting the most important battle in the world today, on the biggest stage. I am typing this on a plane coming back from Jakarta, where I just witnessed history in the making.
I have not seen a land rush this massive since the early days of the Web, and it just might be even bigger.
So what is Grab? Well, the simple and unsatisfying answer is: Theyâ€™re the Uber of Southeast Asia. But thatâ€™s a terrible marketing message, because Uber is trying their best to become the most hated company in the U.S. Itâ€™s like touting them as the Comcast of Southeast Asia. And itâ€™s also inaccurate because the Grab and Uber company philosophies are so radically different.
Instead of comparing Grab to Uber, let me try to thread the narrative from my view on the ground, from back when my sister-in-law Cathy and her husband Romano started a food truck. Until then, Cathy had been working at an optometristâ€™s shop and Romano at a library, so weâ€™re talking about pretty humble beginnings. They had been saving for years to start their own business, and they had researched the heck out of it so they could be as successful as possible.
In 2012 they launched their Xplosive food truck, serving a Filipino/Vietnamese fusion menu of tasty street food, and it was about as successful as a food truck can be. They won awards, were featured prominently in major Seattle magazines, were introduced by the Seattle Mayor, landed huge catering gigs, and were even the highlight act in a video that Jeff Bezos made for his investors, about how hip Amazon was in the South Lake Union area. Xplosiveâ€™s customers (mostly Amazon employees) would line up for an hour each day before the truck arrived, and would beg and plead when their full truck ran out of food after just a few hours.
Sounds like success, right? They had ridden the food truck wave at exactly the right time, and for a couple of years, food trucks were everywhere; they were the in thing. But early last year, Cathy and Romano abruptly sold their truck and their coveted city parking spot right next to Amazon, and quietly opened up a full-time commercial kitchen dedicated to food delivery through Peach.
They made this dramatic change because they had their ear to the ground, so they were among the first to recognize the significance of the Restaurant Apocalypse.
Restaurants and food trucks are both about to be obliterated by Peach and Uber Eats. The whole restaurant industry is quaking over this; itâ€™s why youâ€™ve seen some big restaurants starting up food trucks. But that wonâ€™t save them. The entire food truck industry is about to go tango uniform, disrupted by food delivery just as it was getting off the ground. Trucks will never disappear completely, because they can make money in local venues in good weather. But theyâ€™re not where the real money is. The best profit for small business owners now lies in food delivery.
Food delivery is hitting the world like a cat-5 hurricane. You canâ€™t watch a network football game without seeing commercials about it. It is an exponentially-growing new industry built atop ride-hailing infrastructure, which itself only emerged a few years ago. The driver network can pick up food from literally anywhere and deliver it anywhere within a city-sized radius.
This idea has far-reaching consequences. It turns out that food delivery is a democratization process: It democratizes the restaurant business, creating mom-and-pop entrepreneurial opportunities that simply never existed before. Opening a restaurant is a huge, prohibitively expensive endeavor. Food trucks lowered the barrier to entry significantly, but food delivery lowers it to near-zero. Cathy and Romano realized you can literally cook out of your own commercial kitchen to get started. They are the forefront of a new era. When this idea inevitably takes off, people are going to be able to order take-out from their neighbors, from anyone in the city who wants to cook their family recipe. It will change cuisine forever.
Whatâ€™s astonishing about all this is how fast we went from ride hailing to food delivery to dedicated kitchens for small business owners. In tech years it has unfolded practically overnight. From my perspective, these past few years have been filled with Google teams bickering with each other about what to launch; meanwhile, entire new industries were springing up and evolving through successive disruptors, with more sure to come.
I began this story by grousing that Google canâ€™t innovate anymore, but letâ€™s face it: Uber, Amazon and Facebook (with Facebook Takeout) all didnâ€™t see food coming either. They just copied it.
With that context in mind, letâ€™s look at why I jumped on Grab. Because when I heard about the opportunity and finally understood its potential, I couldnâ€™t say yes fast enough.
Southeast Asia: The Worldâ€™s Battleground
Iâ€™ve painted ride hailing as a big disruptor, but hey, you already knew that. It has enraged taxi businesses around the world to the point of physical violence. Itâ€™s a revolutionary change, and it has become a platform that has enabled the burgeoning and incredibly disruptive food delivery industry.
But in the U.S., people love to hate on Uber because â€œtheir drivers are slave labor.â€� The driver has to pay for a car, maintain the car, insure it, pay for fuel, clean it, etc., so on the whole Uber is viewed as somewhat predatory. I honestly donâ€™t know how much of this is truth vs. perception. But given that millions of drivers are opting in, and given that people are generally pretty clever about optimizing their income, the economics would seem to be at worst a moral gray area in the States and Europe, and more likely a pretty good deal for most drivers.
But ride hailing isnâ€™t really changing society for the better in the U.S. and Europe. Itâ€™s simply making personal transportation a bit cheaper and more accessible. The food delivery revolution is a big social change, but ride hailing itself, not so much.
In Southeast Asia (SEA), however, ride hailing is absolutely transformative and society-changing in ways that we can barely appreciate here in a country where we elect reality TV stars to the office of the presidency. The traffic in SEA is terrible. Aside from Singapore, the traffic infrastructure ranges from bad to terrible to near-nonexistent. (I mean, câ€™mon, Indonesia alone is 17,000 islands.) The credit-card industry is near-nonexistent. This is a much, much harder problem than it is in the States. But there are half a billion people who desperately need both cheap transportation and jobs. Ride hailing provides both!
Itâ€™s not uncommon for people in Southeast Asia to get jobs as drivers and make 3 to 5 times their previous income. I donâ€™t need to read some Gartner report to know this. I just have to go ask family members. My wife Linh is Vietnamese and she has tons of friends and family in Vietnam, the Philippines, Indonesia and Singapore. We already have half a dozen family and close friends who have become Grab drivers in those countries, and they love it. It has changed their lives.
So unlike in the U.S., ride-hailing transport is a game-changer for the entire social and economic infrastructure of Southeast Asia, including Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, Myanmar, Malaysia, Indonesia and the Philippines. Thatâ€™s 620 million peopleâ€Šâ€”â€Štwice the size of the US, including 12 cities of 2M+, of which the US has only four. And the middle class in SEA is expected to double in a couple of years to over 400 million.
Did I mention this is a big opportunity?
After transport, you get the food-delivery wave, which is following suit exactly the way it has in the U.S. And it is growing more rapidly in Southeast Asia, becauseâ€Šâ€”â€Šas any Asian person will happily tell youâ€Šâ€”â€Šthey love their food more than you do. Food unites their cultures in a way thatâ€™s nearly incomprehensible to westerners, especially outside the large cities.
Hereâ€™s the thing, though: Transport and food are only scratching the surface. Same-day food delivery can be generalized to same-day anything delivery, for instance. Weâ€™re going to see major disruptors happening yearly (if not faster) for many years to come. Payments and financial services are up next, and theyâ€™re a staggeringly huge opportunity.
You need to download the Grab app in order to hail a ride or order food. Everyone in Southeast Asia has smartphones, so everyone there is getting the Grab app. Which means the next step is mobile Payments. Grab is signing up local merchantsâ€Šâ€”â€Šand there are millions of them who can participateâ€Šâ€”â€Šat an incredible rate, so that people can pay for stuff with their Grab app.
Why does that matter? After all, mobile payments arenâ€™t really taking off in the U.S. Visa has been pushing them for years and nobodyâ€™s biting; in fact itâ€™s been a disaster. But it matters in Southeast Asia because SEA is primarily a cash economy. Fewer than 2% of adults in SEA have credit cards, and over 60% donâ€™t have bank accounts at all. Thereâ€™s still a deep distrust of banks, and of course thereâ€™s a ton of credit card fraud, which makes the whole thing so dicey that everyone just uses cash there.
But they trust smartphones! You can thank Steve Jobs for that. Southeast Asians use smartphones possibly more than anyone else in the world. Westerners have all these stuffy conventions about not staring into your smartphone while youâ€™re eating with your family, or out having fun with friends, or riding as a passenger on a motorbike, or, you know, driving one. Not so in SEA. Everyone stares happily into their smart phones all the time.
SEA is a cash economy. But cash has a ton of problems. Thieves are everywhere, yes; but there is also an old-world substrate of bribery, corruption, scamming and fraud. For instance, getting into a taxi, if youâ€™re not careful, can quickly land you in a situation where the driver has no meter and demands an exorbitant fee, which he will split with the police officer who will arrest you if you donâ€™t pay up. Heck, we saw a worker today in the Jakarta airport with a company shirt that said â€œNO TIPPINGâ€� on the back, because in SEA there can sometimes be a fine line between tipping and mandatory bribes.
If you pay for everything with your Grab app, then all the prices are agreed and decided up front, and you donâ€™t need to carry any cash at all. So people are adopting it at a rate thatâ€™s nothing short of astonishing, given how cash-centric the SEA economy has been, literally forever. But they can â€œtop upâ€� their Grab account with cash, so their distrust of banks is bypassed completely.
And payments of course opens up even more verticals and servicesâ€Šâ€”â€Špretty much anything you do with money these days in the West, you cannot do in SEA (or you can, but they gouge you on fees, which really hurts when you are poor). Payments are going to open up these verticals to everyone, even people who live out in remote villages. Itâ€™s nuts. The world is changing right under our noses.
So why do I say Iâ€™m going to war?
Well, Uberâ€™s there, obviously. Uber is everywhereâ€¦ except for China, that is, where they had to pull out because Didi was killing them for various reasons. Uber exiting China highlighted a few important things: Firstly, that this is a winner-take-all space, because it creates a network effect by uniting all the verticals and making competition very difficult. Exactly what happened with Didi in China. So competitors will fight until there is only one left standing. That, folks, is a fight to the death.
Another takeaway is that Uber can be beaten, when a few years ago they seemed unbeatable. Frankly I personally think Uber is gonna lose SEA as well. Theyâ€™re planning an IPO and they need to clean up their books, because Uber, as we all know by now, is losing money faster than any company has lost money in the history of money. As one famous investor put it, the ride-hailing space can be thought of as piling huge heaps of money on a table, pouring gasoline on it and lighting it on fire. Uber is dumping billions of dollars into driver and passenger rewards and incentives and promotions in an effort to buy loyalty for just long enough to drive their local competitors (of which there are perhaps eight worldwide) out of business. And of course their competitors are all forced to respond in kind.
I honestly donâ€™t know whatâ€™s going to happen, and Iâ€™m pretty new to this space so if you quote me on any of this then youâ€™re an idiot quoting a bigger idiot. But if I were a betting man, I wouldnâ€™t be betting on Uber in Southeast Asia long-term. Uber has to cut their losses soon, and theyâ€™re being out-competed in Southeast Asia.
Thereâ€™s another player in SEA, strongly resembling Grab. And theyâ€™re fierce. That competitor is Go-Jek, which my iPhone happily auto-corrects to Go-Jerk. They, uh, might want to get that fixed.
Go-Jek and Grab are mortal enemies, locked in a life-and-death land war thatâ€™s going to enable the biggest social and economic transformation in modern history. So even though Vizzini warned us not to do exactly that, Iâ€™m getting myself involved in a land war in Asia.
I have never been so excited. It didnâ€™t really hit home until my first day on the job last week. I went to a Grab leadership conference in Jakarta, and part of it was an Amazing Race where we had to book 2-wheel and 4-wheel rides to get around the city in a race with other teams. When I hopped on the back of that bike, looking up into tropical rain, and the driver headed directly into oncoming traffic and I uttered the words, â€œIâ€™m gonna dieâ€�, thatâ€™s when I knew this was real. And when I realized I couldnâ€™t look anywhere without seeing a sea of green Grab and Go-Jek helmets, thatâ€™s when I realized that this is outright war. This is history being made.
This war is happening on two fronts: Online and offline. Online, we have to put together world-class technology in the shortest timeframe itâ€™s probably ever been done, and the business requirements and business logic are growing more complicated by the week. And I mean literally by the week. But Grab makes smart tech choicesâ€Šâ€”â€Še.g. AWS, the Go language, Kotlin for Android. And they donâ€™t have Not Invented Here syndrome, so they donâ€™t waste time reinventing wheels. I have every confidence that weâ€™ll win this.
Offline, there are armies of agents (real people) involved in expanding the network of drivers, merchants, passengers, and other participants. Weâ€™re talking thousands, hundreds of thousands, millions of agents. Iâ€™m not going to tell you how itâ€™s happening, but those numbers are real.
Oh, and we get to build a platform. You know how I love those.
The whole worldâ€™s attention is focused on Southeast Asia. Banks, investment firms, mega-corporations, government regulators, mafias (!), everyone is charging in, metaphorical guns blazing. This is not hyperbole. This morning I saw a spy photo of an Indonesian mafia-run operation: a big seedy-looking room full of guys with stacks of phones doing fake ride bookings. Amazon just launched same-day Prime delivery in Singapore. Didi and Softbank and countless others are funneling money into the key players. Iâ€™m not exaggerating in the slightest when I say the worldâ€™s attention is focused right here on Grabâ€™s territory, on that network of green motorcycle helmets. Oil companies, power companies, car companies, battery companies, credit card companies, banks, international restaurateurs, tourism companies, taxi companies, airlines, retailersâ€Šâ€”â€Šdozens of major industries are going to be impacted by this land war for better or worse, and theyâ€™re all fighting to make damn sure itâ€™s â€œfor betterâ€� for themselves.
Jeff Bezos has been trying for twenty years to solve the last-mile problem. Back in 1999 he pulled us all into a room and told all 300-odd of us employees that Amazon was dying. This was during the spectacular inflection point in Amazonâ€™s hockey stick growth curve, and we all gaped at him, wondering what the hell he was smoking. He told us calmly that all we sold were books, music and video, and all of them were being digitized and would die soon. Right then and there he predicted the Kindle and iTunes and Amazon Instant Video, none of which emerged until years later. He said that if we didnâ€™t get into hardlines and other businesses, weâ€™d be dead in a few years. He told us we had to be able to sell and ship anything, a live elephant if need be. So we solved that.
But at the same time, he told us that if people couldnâ€™t get their barbecue on the same day, then we were always going to lose to the local merchants. So he set out to solve the last-mile problem: Getting your order to you within an hour or so. And 20 years later, he still hasnâ€™t solved it. Sure, yes, they have same-day delivery for a few SKUs in a few cities, and heâ€™s got AmazonFresh and some other fledgling attempts. But for essentially the whole world, the last-mile problem wasnâ€™t solved until ride-hailing networks came along.
And there is nowhere more difficult to solve that last mile than Southeast Asia. They have some of the highest population density, the worst traffic, the worst infrastructure, and the most people with smartphones who want their stuff now, now, now.
Grab is going to win this war. I know it now because Iâ€™ve met them, and Iâ€™ve met their allies, and Iâ€™ve met their customers. Grab has an unbelievable team. Unlike Google, who canâ€™t be bothered to descend the ivory tower to visit real customers, Grabâ€™s mantra is: â€œGo to the groundâ€�. They constantly encourage every employee to get involved with actual Grab users as often as possible, so that as an organization they can be instantly aware of both customer needs and incoming market changes, and pivot quickly.
I canâ€™t emphasize enough how powerful that mantra is. Amazonâ€™s motto is â€œEarthâ€™s Most Customer-Centric Companyâ€�, and they have built a brand trusted by everyone on earth. But they only interact with their customers once a yearâ€Šâ€”â€ŠJeff Bezos mandates that every leader in the company spend a day a year in the customer call centers, because info relayed back from Customer Service reps doesnâ€™t paint the full picture. You have to experience it.
And Google (â€œFocus on the User and all else will followâ€�) employees basically never interact with their customers. Amazon only puts its ear to the ground sporadically, and Google, never.
If you want to hear the latest rumors and real customer needs, then you need all your leaders to be out talking to real customers. You can predict how innovative a company will be by watching how close they are to their customers. This will also predict how responsive they will be to market shifts. â€œGoing to the groundâ€� as a corporate culture is a leading indicator of innovative success. For Amazon itâ€™s yearly. Grab is aiming for daily. Their employees all use Grab to commute, which provides direct contact with drivers and other passengers. (We need to find a way in the Grab Seattle eng office, somehow.)
Going to the ground is how Xplosive saw that they needed to sell their truck and start a kitchen, easily a year before anyone else. Itâ€™s how Peach realized food delivery was going to be huge before Amazon, Uber and Facebook, all of whom only learned about it from competitors. You innovate by going to the ground. And thatâ€™s Grabâ€™s motto, which they take dead seriously.
Grab will win because they go to the ground.
Iâ€™ve seen Grabâ€™s hunger. Iâ€™ve felt it. I have it. This space is win or die. They will fight to the death, and I am with them. This company, with some 3000 employees I think, is more unified than Iâ€™ve seen with most 5-person companies. This is the kind of focused camaraderie, cooperation and discipline that you typically only see in the military, in times of war.
Which should hardly surprise you, because thatâ€™s exactly what this is. This is war.
I am giving everything Iâ€™ve got to help Grab win. I am all in. Youâ€™d be amazed at what you can accomplish when youâ€™re all in.
But you canâ€™t win a war without allies.
So give me a call.
Presented as a story to a group of students by their teacher Lena that takes place in the distant future, The Last Mimzy is the story of the attempt by humans in the distant future to avert a catastrophic ecological disaster that has destroyed their world. High-tech devices disguised as toys are sent back in time and are found by Noah and Emma Wilder, children living in early-21st-century Seattle. The "toys" are incomprehensible to Emma (Rhiannon Leigh Wryn) and Noah (Chris O'Neil), except for what appears to be a stuffed rabbit. Sensing the paranormal strangeness of the devices, the children initially keep their discovery secret from their parents.
Emma becomes telepathically connected to the stuffed rabbit, and learns its name, Mimzy, and other information from it, acknowledging it as her teacher. Interaction with the devices causes the children to develop advanced knowledge, genius-level intelligence and psionic abilities. Due to her psychic connection with Mimzy, Emma's development of her abilities is much stronger than her older brother's; she is the only one to display empathy, telepathy, levitation, and telekinesis (though Noah can also communicate with her once she has telepathically contacted him). Emma is also the only one who can use the Spinners, strange rocks that when spun, telekinetically float and produce a force-field. Noah's own psionic/physic abilities are developed through a green card and a seashell. He gains increased intelligence, knowledge, telepathy, empathic communication and control over arthropods. He can also use the card to telekinetically teleport objects through a small dimensional rift after staring at it and observing his surroundings. At one point, Noah becomes somewhat envious of his sister's psionic prowess, but she reveals to him that even though she is the "chosen one', he is her chosen "engineer" and she cannot "build the bridge to the future" without him.
The children's astounding psionic and extrasensory abilities and Emma's attachment to Mimzy alert their parents, especially their mother, and Larry White, Noah's science schoolteacher, to the devices. Later, Noah accidentally fuses the card with a blue blob, turning it into a Generator that causes a power black-out over half the state of Washington, alerting the FBI to their activities. The family is held for questioning by Special Agent Nathaniel Broadman (Michael Clarke Duncan), and it is revealed that Mimzy is actually a highly advanced form of artificial life utilizing nanotechnology created by Intel. Emma tells everyone that Mimzy has a message from humanity's distant future. She explains that pollution has corrupted humanity's DNA, and many rabbits like Mimzy have been sent to the past, since no natural life forms can survive time travel, but none have successfully returned. Mimzy is the last one remaining, but is now dying. The reason for the other Mimzys' deaths is that the "chosen ones" before Emma had no "engineers" (like Noah) to help build the bridge across time. Mimzy explains to Emma that she and Noah must use the toys as a time machine to return it to the future with uncorrupted 21st-century human DNA, which the people of the future can use to correct the damage to their DNA caused by ecological problems.
Despite attempts by the unbelieving FBI to prevent them, Noah and Emma use their psionic abilities to escape so they can activate a time portal. Before leaving, Mimzy absorbs a tear from Emma, thus providing the DNA required to restore humanity's corrupted DNA. Emma is almost sucked into the future with Mimzy, but Noah grabs Emma and pulls her out of the portal just as Mimzy is sent back to its own time. Following the transport, Noah's science teacher, who was present at the event, claims he saw "numbers", a reference to a previous dream he had with numbers in it, which turned out to be the winning lottery numbers, but missed out because he never bought a ticketâ€”thus exciting his fiancÃ©e about this second opportunity. Back in the future setting, Mimzy returns to the future, and humans are finally able to restore their DNA, and more importantly, the "mental corruption" that stripped most of them of their feelings toward each other. The teacher ends the story time and the children levitate and fly home. The world in their time has become a beautiful place, where humanity has integrated into the constructed ecosystems.
The story ends in the current time, with Emma's teacher (Julia Arkos) asking if anyone did anything exciting over the weekend break. No one volunteers, so she calls on Emma at random, who merely smiles.
Identical batteries same model purchased together. From 2017 Red Mi model phone.
1st battery =100% full charged. Exploded instantly when nailed on.
2nd battery =0% charge, was charged 1st to full and used until flat. Nothing will happen nailed nor when Axed cut through center.
No charge = No energy = safe
100% charge = max risk
Over charged = you asked for it!