Originally posted by dragg:
i disagree.
chelsea bought the players with the funds provided. the players won the title fair and square.
the only difference is instead of spending a few hundred million to build a team over, say 10 years, chelsea did it in 2 years.
frankly, if other teams have the same financial ability, will they not use capitalise on it too.
but of course, base on history of the EPL, chelsea are way behind man u and arsenal.
I have no doubts on how Chelsea won the last 2 championships. Cause the table doesn't lie.
However, it is off-the fields antics that irrates most.
the way they lure Peter kenyon, Cole, Rio, even the trainer is less than desirable.
the way they dominate the transfer market is creating an uneven playing field.
it is like playing a mod CM, and with cheat codes.
but at least now, more and more established players are not chosing to go to the blues unless they want the fast buck..