Originally posted by breytonhartgeKing David, a man after Hashem heart. In his life, David faced many trials and tribulations. His Psalms reflect his faith and hope in Hashem during trials and tribulations. Psalm 110 is an example. However Christians would like to infer that this Psalm refers to Yeshua. To Christians, Yeshua is both king and High Priest. However I beg to defer.
Psalm 110
–A Psalm of David.
1 Adonai says to my Lord,
“Sit at My right hand,
Till I make Your enemies Your footstool.”
2 Adonai will send your powerful scepter out from Tziyon,
so that you will rule over your enemies around you.
3 On the day your forces mobilize,
your people willingly offer themselves
in holy splendors from the womb of the dawn:
the dew of your youth is yours.
4 Adonai has sworn it,
And will not relent,
“You are a Cohen forever
According to the order of Malki-Tzedek.”
5 Adonai at Your right hand;
He shall execute kings in the day of His wrath.
6 He shall judge among the nations,
He shall fill the places with dead bodies,
He shall execute the heads of many countries.
7 He shall drink of the brook by the wayside;
Therefore He shall lift up the head.
This is from the Tanakh and it is a prophecy about Yeshua who will be our Cohen Hagadol.
Originally posted by YaffaI do respect your conviction that Yeshua is the Way, Truth and Life. However I beg to differ.
Shalom!
Yeshua is the Messiah, he came not to abolish the "law" or Torah, but to conquer spiritual or eternal death of our souls and restore eternal life back to us, so yes, everyone needs Yeshua, even those who live faithfully by the Torah and Tanakh.
When Adam first sinned, the punishment was spiritual and natural death, the tree of (eternal) life was made inaccessible to mankind. Yeshua came to restore the way to the tree of life and this path has been reopened and made available to mankind now. The door through which we enter to this tree of life is Yeshua, the Messiah, the Word, the Way, Truth and Life.
The law of Moses is really YHVH's Word as given through Moses, it is not some man made "law" or religious belief.
This psalm cannot refer to Shlomo because he is not Cohen forever...Originally posted by Creation1656:King David, a man after Hashem heart. In his life, David faced many trials and tribulations. His Psalms reflect his faith and hope in Hashem during trials and tribulations. Psalm 110 is an example. However Christians would like to infer that this Psalm refers to Yeshua. To Christians, Yeshua is both king and High Priest. However I beg to defer.
Let's look at verse 1 & 5. It is not possible for Yeshua, one person, to be both at the right hand and left hand of Hashem.
Perhaps, we can read Psalm 110 from this angle. King David was facing his final trials during his Kingship. Please read 1 Kings chapters 1 & 2.
His son, Adonijah made himself king against the wishes of his father and Hashem. Adonijah was supported by Joab, commander of David's army, and Abiathar, a high priest under king David, a descendent of Eli.
Zadok, the other high priest under king David remains loyal. Nathan, the prophet and Benaiah, a commander in David's army also remains loyal.
Together the managed to secure the kindship for Solomon, the rightful heir.
"As the LORD has been with my lord the king, so may He be with Solomon, and make his throne greater than the throne of my lord king David". 1 Kings 1:37.
After Zadok and Nathan had anointed Solomon as King, consider what king David said.
"The King has also said thus, 'Blessed be the LORD, the God of Isreal, who has granted one to sit on my throne today while my own eyes see it" 1 Kings 1:48.
This Psalm refer to a young king, Solomon, who has yet to consolidate his rule. With Hashem help, he will consolidate his rule and his kingship will even be more glorious that his father, king David.
Zadok, who remain loyal, became the only high priest under Solomon Kingship. Zadok priesthood is also comfirmed by Hashem in Ezekiel chapter 44.
Shalom
Originally posted by breytonhartge1. Hashem gave the Kingship to the descendents of Solomon.
This psalm cannot refer to Shlomo because he is not Cohen forever...
Also note here that it is Adonai who said sit... not man.
yet you conveniently leave out verse 45 whhcih also reads that there are other chohanim not of the descendants of Zadok.Originally posted by Creation1656:2. Hashem gave the priesehood to the descendents of Zadok.
"but the chamber which faces towards the north is for the priest who keep charge of the altar. These are the sons of Zadok, who from the sons of Levi come near to the LORD to minister to Him" Ezekiel 40:46 (NASB)
Shalom
Originally posted by breytonhartge:Let us examine verse 45 and 46
yet you conveniently leave out verse 45 whhcih also reads that there are other chohanim not of the descendants of Zadok.
Also, the verse mentions nothing about appointment of a cohen hagadol which is different from ordinary cohanim.
Originally posted by breytonhartge:Let us examine verse 45 and 46
yet you conveniently leave out verse 45 whhcih also reads that there are other chohanim not of the descendants of Zadok.
Also, the verse mentions nothing about appointment of a cohen hagadol which is different from ordinary cohanim.
Yahweh will not contradict Himself. The contradictions come as a result of flawed understanding on the part of man who employ a roman/greek hellenistic understanding of the Tanakh and not a Hebraic one. If one employs a Hebraic understanding the whole of the Brit Chadashah will be seen in a different light.Originally posted by Creation1656:I sincerely hope that you read the NT carefully. The NT contains many contradictions and errors that it could not be the words of Hashem. For Hashem is not a man, Hashem is G-d who will not contradict Himself.
Perhaps, you may like to discuss the contradictions in the NT?
Shalom
Originally posted by breytonhartge:Even with 'Hebraic' understanding, there are factual discrepancies. Let us examine these verses:
Yahweh will not contradict Himself. The contradictions come as a result of flawed understanding on the part of man who employ a roman/greek hellenistic understanding of the Tanakh and not a Hebraic one. If one employs a Hebraic understanding the whole of the Brit Chadashah will be seen in a different light.
Of course it will be Yahweh who will decide who is included in the book of life at the end of this age.Originally posted by Creation1656:I do respect your conviction that Yeshua is the Way, Truth and Life. However I beg to differ.
Let us look at these verses:
"But now, if you will, forgive their sin - and if not, please blot me out from your book which you have written!" The LORD said to Moses "Whoever has sinned against Me, I will blot him out of My book" Exodus 32:32-33 (NASB)
"But as for you, go your way to the end; then you will enter into rest and rise again for allotted portion at the end of the age" Daniel 12:13 (NASB)
It is without a shadow of doubt that Hashem alone will decide who will be included in His book of Life at the end of the age.
Shalom
1. The tribe of Dan went into idolatry see Judges 17:1-18:31 also see also Amos 8:11-14.Originally posted by Creation1656:Even with 'Hebraic' understanding, there are factual discrepancies. Let us examine these verses:
"And I heard the number of those who were sealed, 144 000 sealed from every tribes of Isreal;
From the tribe of Judah, 12 000 were sealed, from the tribe of Reuben 12 000, from the tribe of Gad 12 000,
from the tribe of Asher 12 000, from the tribe of Naphtali 12 000, from the tribe of Manasseh 12 000,
from the tribe of Simeon 12 000, from the tribe of Levi 12 000, from the tribe of Issachar 12 000,
from the tribe of Zebulun 12 000, from the tribe of Joseph 12 000, from the tribe of Benjamin, 12 000 were sealed." Revelation 7:4-8 NASB
1. Are the above all the tribes of Isreal? What happen to tribe of Dan?
2. Do you have problem with verse 8. Is there a tribe call "Joseph". Consider these scriptures:
"Now your two sons, who are born to you in the land of Egypt before I came to you in Egypt, shall be mine; Ephraim and Manasseh shall be mine no less than Reuben and Simeon. But the progeny born to you after them shall be yours; they shall be recorded instead (under the names) of their brothers in their inheritance." Genesis 48:5-6 Tanakh (JPS)
1. An Isrealite must be born into a tribe, an Isrealite cannot change tribe. So, who will be the people in the tribe of "Joseph". Please read again Genesis 48:5-6.Originally posted by breytonhartge:1. The tribe of Dan went into idolatry see Judges 17:1-18:31 also see also Amos 8:11-14.
what does Revelation 7:23 say just before listing those sealed? It says "And I saw another angel ascending from the east, having the seal of the living God: and he cried with a loud voice to the four angels, to whom it was given to hurt the earth and the sea, Saying, Hurt not the earth, neither the sea, nor the trees, TILL WE HAVE SEALED THE SERVANTS OF OUR GOD in their foreheads."
The tribe of DAN was not faithful to Yahweh but served idols and false gods.
2. The tribe of Joseph is mentioned because of the loss of Epharim (The tribe of Joseph replaces that of Epharim). The tribe of Epharim is also lost due to idolatry. See Hosea 4:17 and Hosea 7:16
The tribe of Joseph actually consisted of Manasseh and Epharim, since Epharim went into idolatry, the Tribe of Joseph replaced it.Originally posted by Creation1656:1. An Isrealite must be born into a tribe, an Isrealite cannot change tribe. So, who will be the people in the tribe of "Joseph". Please read again Genesis 48:5-6.
2. Are you very sure that the tribe of Dan will be cut off from Isreal during the messianic age? Consider these scriptures:
"These are the names of the tribes: At the eastern end, along the Hethlon road, Lebo-hamath to Hazar-enan which is the border of Damascus, with Hamath to the north from the eastern border to the sea: Dan - one tribe." Ezekiel 48:1 Tanakh JPS. Please read Ezekiel chapter 48:2-29.
All the 12 tribes of Isreal are allocated their portions, if tribe of Levi is included then it is 13 tribes in total. There is no tribe of Joseph and there is a tribe of Dan.
Shalom
Shalom, brother. May the peace of Hashem be with you.Originally posted by breytonhartge:Yes, I know the verse, did I say the tribe of Dan was cut off? No. I just said that they did not get their blessing. Well since you know so much, then, it is pointless debating with you. You had best argue with Yahweh about whether there will be a tribe of Joseph or not. For ultimately it is He that has final say. Who am I to argue with Him??
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:Judaism don't preach heaven and hell.
Heaven and hell are concepts for weak minded people...
are you sure you are that strong minded?Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:Heaven and hell are concepts for weak minded people...
can give summary or not?Originally posted by Creation1656:Shalom, brother. May the peace of Hashem be with you.
only two pages... go and read lah...Originally posted by Icemoon:can give summary or not?
what are the two of you arguing?
It was already confusing from the start.Originally posted by breytonhartge:only two pages... go and read lah...
Originally pocted bt Icemoon:Should sympathize with the dilemma faced by NT believers, when confronted with the prospect that the NT may not be infallible. BTW the piece you wrote in EH, comparing the writings in Hebrew to Jeremiah, is brilliant. What do you think would be the reactions of NT believers to your thesis?
It was already confusing from the start.
How come creation tried to answer your questions from a Christian pov .. then end up two of you arguing?
purely because brey will NOT accept anything from a Christian POV....Originally posted by Icemoon:It was already confusing from the start.
How come creation tried to answer your questions from a Christian pov .. then end up two of you arguing?
Many NT writings plagiarise from the OT; sometimes the translation (Hebrew to Greek) really yi2 xiao4 da4 fang1.Originally posted by Creation1656:Should sympathize with the dilemma faced by NT believers, when confronted with the prospect that the NT may not be infallible. BTW the piece you wrote in EH, comparing the writings in Hebrew to Jeremiah, is brilliant. What do you think would be the reactions of NT believers to your thesis?
I reminiscene (sp?) those days when I try to prove him wrong and the Christian POV right.Originally posted by Chin Eng:purely because brey will NOT accept anything from a Christian POV....
if anything else, brey is very similar to our dear andrew.... will not accept anything other their own POV....