call troll busters??Originally posted by Icemoon:Attention .. troll in Deeper Truths.
What is mod gonna do?
really they do??!!!Originally posted by Philip Pullman:Fact: they worship a god, a ghost, a holy man and his mother
wait you are talking about the roman catholics right? I think the christians do not worship the holy man's mother...Originally posted by Philip Pullman:Fact: they worship a god, a ghost, a holy man and his mother
what? you should read the protestant fathers' stand on the Perpetual Virginity of Mary.Originally posted by breytonhartge:wait you are talking about the roman catholics right? I think the christians do not worship the holy man's mother...
What we know for certain is that Joseph "had no union with her until she gave birth to a son" (Matthew 1:25). The "until" seems to imply that he did enjoy sexual union with Mary after Christ's birth. There is no indication that their abstinence was permanent.Originally posted by Icemoon:what? you should read the protestant fathers' stand on the Perpetual Virginity of Mary.
it is a sticky in the RC forum - http://www.sgforums.com/?action=thread_display&thread_id=154829
Actually the fact that Mary was mentioned with other four women in the genealogy - Rehab, Tamar, Bathsheba and Ruth - tells us something.Originally posted by breytonhartge:What we know for certain is that Joseph "had no union with her until she gave birth to a son" (Matthew 1:25). The "until" seems to imply that he did enjoy sexual union with Mary after Christ's birth. There is no indication that their abstinence was permanent.
so how? are both the RC church and the protestant church deluded? or do they only see what they want to see.
Herzog_Zwei from Troll Busters International. What do you want us do to the troll? Flame his arse off?Originally posted by breytonhartge:call troll busters??
ok... this part is debatable.... though you were right on this in that there is no conclusive indication that their abstinence was permanent, there is on the flip side neither conclusive indication that their abstinence was not permanent.Originally posted by breytonhartge:What we know for certain is that Joseph "had no union with her until she gave birth to a son" (Matthew 1:25). The "until" seems to imply that he did enjoy sexual union with Mary after Christ's birth. There is no indication that their abstinence was permanent.
so how? are both the RC church and the protestant church deluded? or do they only see what they want to see.
on the topic Perpetual Virginity of Mary, it only show 2 thingsOriginally posted by Icemoon:what? you should read the protestant fathers' stand on the Perpetual Virginity of Mary.
it is a sticky in the RC forum - http://www.sgforums.com/?action=thread_display&thread_id=154829
We worship only one God who is three yet one...Originally posted by breytonhartge:wait you are talking about the roman catholics right? I think the christians do not worship the holy man's mother...
Actually Yahweh is one, not three...Originally posted by Kuali Baba:We worship only one God who is three yet one...
It's with reference to the doctrine of Trinitarianism, but it was my way of saying that we do not worship the Blessed Virgin Mary or the saints.Originally posted by breytonhartge:Actually Yahweh is one, not three...
doesn't the doctrine of the trinity have pagan roots?Originally posted by Kuali Baba:It's with reference to the doctrine of Trinitarianism, but it was my way of saying that we do not worship the Blessed Virgin Mary or the saints.
Might not be.Originally posted by breytonhartge:doesn't the doctrine of the trinity have pagan roots?
Ah .. the mystery of the Incarnation that God is one yet three.Originally posted by breytonhartge:Actually Yahweh is one, not three...
what about Constantine the great? was he not instrumental in this doctrine being put forward.Originally posted by Icemoon:Might not be.
The doctrine might be similar to certain pagan ideas, but it might not originate from those pagan ideas.
Edit: As an example, look at animal sacrifice in the OT. You wouldn't say it has pagan roots also right?
You watched too much DVC liao issit?Originally posted by breytonhartge:what about Constantine the great? was he not instrumental in this doctrine being put forward.
according to the Brit Chadashah, Mary was not a virgin... Mattityahu 21:25Originally posted by Kuali Baba:It's with reference to the doctrine of Trinitarianism, but it was my way of saying that we do not worship the Blessed Virgin Mary or the saints.
strange.... Mattiyahu 21:25 The immersion of Yochanan, where was it from? From heaven or from men?"Originally posted by breytonhartge:according to the Brit Chadashah, Mary was not a virgin... Mattityahu 21:25
... but he did not have sexual relations with her until she had given birth to a son, and he named him Yeshua.
Originally posted by Chin Eng:then follow on to verse 25... Yosef did not have sexual relations with her UNTIL she had given birth to Yeshua. So to still call her a virgin is denying reality. She is not. After the birth of Yeshua she was not. So why still call her a virgin?
strange.... Mattiyahu 21:25 The immersion of Yochanan, where was it from? From heaven or from men?"
They reasoned with themselves, saying, "If we say, 'From heaven,' he will ask us, 'Why then did you not believe him?'
where got say Mary was not a virgin????
somemore.....
Mattiyahu 1:22 Now all this has happened, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the Lord through the prophet, saying,
1:23"Behold, the [b]virgin shall be with child,
And shall bring forth a son.
They shall call his name Immanu'el;"
Which is, being interpreted, "God with us."
1:24Yosef arose from his sleep, and did as the angel of the Lord commanded him, and took his wife to himself; 1:25and didn't know her sexually until she had brought forth her firstborn son. He named him Yeshua.
... so Mary was virgin or not hah?
[/b]